Structural and Volumetric Brain MRI Findings in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Taylor CA,
   2. Bell JM,
   3. Breiding MJ, et al

   . Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths: United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66:1–16 doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1 pmid:28301451

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. McMahon P,
   2. Hricik A,
   3. Yue JK, et al

   . Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma 2014;31:26–33 doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2984 pmid:23952719

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Nelson LD,
   2. Temkin NR,
   3. Dikmen S, et al

   . Recovery after mild traumatic brain injury in patients presenting to US Level I trauma centers: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study. JAMA Neurol 2019; Jun 3. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1313 pmid:31157856

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   Management of Concussion-mild Traumatic Brain Injury Working Group. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense; 2016
5. 5.↵
   1. Shetty VS,
   2. Reis MN,
   3. Aulino JM, et al

   . ACR Appropriateness Criteria Head Trauma. J Am Coll Radiology 2016;13:668–79 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.023 pmid:27262056

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Wu X,
   2. Kirov II,
   3. Gonen O, et al

   . MR imaging applications in mild traumatic brain injury: an imaging update. Radiology 2016;279:693–707 doi:10.1148/radiol.16142535 pmid:27183405

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   DCoE Clinical Recommendation. Neuroimaging following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Non-Deployed Setting. July 2013. https://health.mil/Reference-Center/Forms/2013/07/08/Neuroimaging-following-TBI-in-non-deployed-setting. Accessed March 25, 2019
8. 8.↵
   1. Reneman L,
   2. de Win MM,
   3. Booij J, et al

   . Incidental head and neck findings on MRI in young healthy volunteers: prevalence and clinical implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1971–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3217 pmid:22723061

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Riedy G,
   2. Senseney JS,
   3. Liu W, et al

   . Findings from structural MR imaging in military traumatic brain injury. Radiology 2016;279:207–15 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150438 pmid:26669604

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Orrison WW,
    2. Hanson EH,
    3. Alamo T, et al

    . Traumatic brain injury: a review and high-field MRI findings in 100 unarmed combatants using a literature-based checklist approach. J Neurotrauma 2009;26:689–701 doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0636 pmid:19335205

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Tate DF,
    2. Gusman M,
    3. Kini J, et al

    . Susceptibility weighted imaging and white matter abnormality findings in service members with persistent cognitive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. Mil Med 2017;182:e1651–58 doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00132 pmid:28290939

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Fischl B,
    2. Salat DH,
    3. Busa E, et al

    . Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33:341–55 doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x pmid:11832223

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Kierans A,
    3. Kenul D, et al

    . Mild traumatic brain injury: longitudinal regional brain volume changes. Radiology 2013;267:880–90 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122542 pmid:23481161

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Weaver LK,
    2. Wilson SH,
    3. Lindblad AS, et al

    . Hyperbaric oxygen for post-concussive symptoms in United States military service members: a randomized clinical trial. Undersea Hyperb Med 2018;45:129–56 pmid:29734566

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Weaver LK,
    2. Wilson SH,
    3. Lindblad AS, et al

    ; NORMAL Study Team. Comprehensive evaluation of healthy volunteers using multi-modality brain injury assessments: an exploratory, observational study. Front Neurol 2018;9:1030 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01030 pmid:30631299

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Corrigan JD,
    2. Bogner J

    . Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007;22:318–29 doi:10.1097/01.HTR.0000300227.67748.77 pmid:18025964

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Weaver LK,
    2. Chhoeu AH,
    3. Lindblad AS, et al

    . Hyperbaric oxygen for mild traumatic brain injury: design and baseline summary. Undersea Hyperb Med 2016;43:489–508 pmid:28768069

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Rosset A,
    2. Spadola L,
    3. Ratib O

    . OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:205–16 doi:10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6 pmid:15534753

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Grinnon ST,
    2. Miller K,
    3. Marler JR, et al

    . National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element Project: approach and methods. Clin Trials 2012;9:322–29 doi:10.1177/1740774512438980 pmid:22371630

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Brandstack N,
    2. Kurki T,
    3. Tenovuo O, et al

    . MR imaging of head trauma: visibility of contusions and other intraparenchymal injuries in early and late stage. Brain Inj 2006;20:409–16 doi:10.1080/02699050500487951 pmid:16716986

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Segonne F,
    2. Dale AM,
    3. Busa E, et al

    . A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 2004;22:1060–75 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.032 pmid:15219578

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Fischl B,
    2. Salat DH,
    3. van der Kouwe AJ, et al

    . Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 1):S69–84 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.016 pmid:15501102

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Sled JG,
    2. Zijdenbos AP,
    3. Evans AC

    . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:87–97 doi:10.1109/42.668698 pmid:9617910

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Fischl B,
    2. Liu A,
    3. Dale AM

    . Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:70–80 doi:10.1109/42.906426 pmid:11293693

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Segonne F,
    2. Pacheco J,
    3. Fischl B

    . Geometrically accurate topology-correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:518–29 doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.887364 pmid:17427739

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Dale AM,
    2. Fischl B,
    3. Sereno MI

    . Cortical surface-based analysis, I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999;9:179–94 doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 pmid:9931268

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Dale AM,
    2. Sereno MI

    . Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 1993;5:162–76 doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 pmid:23972151

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Fischl B,
    2. Dale AM

    . Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:11050–55 doi:10.1073/pnas.200033797 pmid:10984517

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Holm S

    . A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979;6:65–70

    Web of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Weaver LK,
    2. Churchill S,
    3. Wilson SH, et al

    . A composite outcome for mild traumatic brain injury in trials of hyperbaric oxygen. Undersea Hyperb Med 2019;46:341–52 pmid:31394603

    PubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Akiyama Y,
    2. Miyata K,
    3. Harada K, et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of cerebral microhemorrhage in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2009;49:97–99; discussion 99 doi:10.2176/nmc.49.97 pmid:19318732

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Bumb JM,
    2. Brockmann MA,
    3. Groden C, et al

    . TrueFISP of the pediatric pineal gland: volumetric and microstructural analysis. Clin Neuroradiol 2012;22:69–77 doi:10.1007/s00062-011-0110-5 pmid:22101692

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Nolte I,
    2. Brockmann MA,
    3. Gerigk L, et al

    . TrueFISP imaging of the pineal gland: more cysts and more abnormalities. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010;112:204–08 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.11.010 pmid:20034731

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Dean PJ,
    2. Sato JR,
    3. Vieira G, et al

    . Long-term structural changes after mTBI and their relation to post-concussion symptoms. Brain Inj 2015;29:1211–18 doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1035334 pmid:26067623

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Spitz G,
    2. Bigler ED,
    3. Abildskov T, et al

    . Regional cortical volume and cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury. Brain Cogn 2013;83:34–44 doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.007 pmid:23872098

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Burrowes SA,
    2. Rhodes CS,
    3. Meeker TJ, et al

    . Decreased grey matter volume in mTBI patients with post-traumatic headache compared to headache-free mTBI patients and healthy controls: a longitudinal MRI study. Brain Imaging Behav 2019 Apr 12. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s11682-019-00095-7 pmid:30980274

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Epstein DJ,
    2. Legarreta M,
    3. Bueler E, et al

    . Orbitofrontal cortical thinning and aggression in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Behav 2016;6:e00581 doi:10.1002/brb3.581 pmid:28032004

    CrossRefPubMed