Analysis of Flow Dynamics and Outcomes of Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Intrasaccular Flow-Diverting Devices

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Biondi A

   . Endovascular techniques for the management of wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: a critical review of the literature. J Neuroradiol 2016;43:167–75 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.02.001 pmid:26976346

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Zhou G,
   3. Su M,
   4. Yin YL, et al

   . Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E17 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16450 pmid:28565981

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Simgen A,
   3. Ley D,
   4. Roth C, et al

   . Evaluation of occurring complications after flow diverter treatment of elastase-induced aneurysm in rabbits using micro-CT and MRI at 9.4 T. Neuroradiology 2016;58:987–96 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1730-x pmid:27457491

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Ding YH,
   3. Lewis DA,
   4. Kadirvel R, et al

   . The Woven EndoBridge: a new aneurysm occlusion device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:607–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2399 pmid:21330397

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Liebig T,
   4. Sychra V, et al

   . Intrasaccular flow-disruption treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1232–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3191 pmid:22678844

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Lubicz B,
   3. Mine B,
   4. Collignon L, et al

   . WEB device for endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1209–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3387 pmid:23292529

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Klisch J,
   4. Cognard C, et al

   . Endovascular WEB flow disruption in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: preliminary feasibility, clinical, and anatomical results in a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2013;73:27–34; discussion 34–35 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000429860.04276.c1 pmid:23615104

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Yavuz K,
   3. Geyik S,
   4. Cekirge S, et al

   . Double stent-assisted coil embolization treatment for bifurcation aneurysms: immediate treatment results and long-term angiographic outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1778–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3464 pmid:23538409

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Cekirge HS,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. Geyik S, et al

   . A novel “Y” stent flow diversion technique for the endovascular treatment of bifurcation aneurysms without endosaccular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1262–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2475 pmid:21527573

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Appanaboyina S, et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67 doi:10.1109/TMI.2005.844159 pmid:15822804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Chung BJ,
    4. Chudyk J, et al

    . Image-based modeling of blood flow in cerebral aneurysms treated with intrasaccular flow diverting devices. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2019;35:e3202 doi:10.1002/cnm.3202 pmid:30891958

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Aubry R,
    4. Löhner R, et al

    . Fast numerical solutions of patient-specific blood flows in 3D arterial systems. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2010;26:73–85 doi:10.1002/cnm.1235 pmid:21076685

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Putman CM, et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/5/005 pmid:18460763

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Appanaboyina S,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Löhner R, et al

    . Computational fluid dynamics of stented intracranial aneurysms using adaptive embedded unstructured grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2008;57:457–93 doi:10.1002/fld.1590

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Löhner R,
    4. Chien A, et al

    . Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2011;27:822–39 doi:10.1002/cnm.1424 pmid:21643491

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Raghavan ML,
    3. Ma B,
    4. Harbaugh RE

    . Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355 pmid:15739566

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Augsburger L,
    4. Reymond P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1827–34 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1482-2 pmid:22926629

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Raschi M, et al

    . Analysis of hemodynamics and aneurysm occlusion after flow-diverting treatment in rabbit models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1567–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3913 pmid:24722302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Paliwal N,
    3. Damiano RJ,
    4. Davies JM, et al

    . Association between hemodynamic modifications and clinical outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverters. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2017;10135 doi:10.1117/12.2254584 pmid:28515570

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Bonnefous O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . A DSA-based method using contrast-motion estimation for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow-diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:805–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3322 pmid:23124641

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Chung BJ, et al

    . Understanding angiography-based aneurysm flow fields through comparison with computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1180–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5158 pmid:28385882

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Herbreteau D,
    3. Bibi R,
    4. Narata AP, et al

    . Are anatomic results influenced by WEB shape modification? Analysis in a prospective, single-center series of 39 patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2280–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4918 pmid:27538903

    Abstract/FREE Full Text