Susceptibility-Weighted Angiography for the Follow-Up of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Cognard C,
   4. Spelle L

   . Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of the hemorrhagic risk and its morbidity [in French]. J Neuroradiol 2004;31:369–75 doi:10.1016/S0150-9861(04)97018-6 pmid:15687954

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Novakovic RL,
   3. Lazzaro MA,
   4. Castonguay AC, et al

   . The diagnosis and management of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurol Clin 2013;31:749–63 doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2013.03.003 pmid:23896503

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Maruyama K,
   3. Kawahara N,
   4. Shin M, et al

   . The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. N Engl J Med 2005;352:146–53 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040907 pmid:15647577

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Oppenheim C,
   3. Meder JF,
   4. Trystram D, et al

   . Radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: is an early angiogram needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:475–81 pmid:10219415

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Steiner L,
   3. Lindquist C,
   4. Adler JR, et al

   . Clinical outcome of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1992;77:1–8 doi:10.3171/jns.1992.77.1.0001 pmid:1607950

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Dawkins AA,
   3. Evans AL,
   4. Wattam J, et al

   . Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 2007;49:753–59 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0252-y pmid:17594083

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Heiserman JE,
   3. Dean BL,
   4. Hodak JA, et al

   . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–07; discussion 1408–11 pmid:7985557

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Earnest F 4th.,
   3. Forbes G,
   4. Sandok BA, et al

   . Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:247–53 pmid:6198889

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Bendszus M,
   3. Koltzenburg M,
   4. Burger R, et al

   . Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07083-X pmid:10560674

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Heidenreich JO,
    3. Schilling AM,
    4. Unterharnscheidt F, et al

    . Assessment of 3D-TOF-MRA at 3.0 Tesla in the characterization of the angioarchitecture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. Acta Radiol 2007;48:678–86 doi:10.1080/02841850701326958 pmid:17611878

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Lim HK,
    3. Choi CG,
    4. Kim SM, et al

    . Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced four-dimensional MR angiography at 3.0 T. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1064–69 doi:10.1259/bjr/30618275 pmid:22294705

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Unlu E,
    3. Temizoz O,
    4. Albayram S, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMs. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:367–78 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.007 pmid:16965882

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Soize S,
    3. Bouquigny F,
    4. Kadziolka K, et al

    . Value of 4D MR angiography at 3T compared with DSA for the follow-up of treated brain arteriovenous malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1903–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3982 pmid:24904052

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Hadizadeh DR,
    3. Kukuk GM,
    4. Steck DT, et al

    . Noninvasive evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations by 4D-MRA for preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in 56 patients: comparison with DSA and intraoperative findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1095–101 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2921 pmid:22300925

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Ishii K,
    4. Kawaguchi H, et al

    . High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology 2014;270:834–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.13131669 pmid:24475844

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Mawad H,
    3. Laurin LP,
    4. Naud JF, et al

    . Changes in urinary and serum levels of novel biomarkers after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Biomark Insights 2016;11:91–94 doi:10.4137/BMI.S39199 pmid:27398022

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Jagadeesan BD,
    3. Delgado Almandoz JE,
    4. Moran CJ, et al

    . Accuracy of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the detection of arteriovenous shunting in vascular malformations of the brain. Stroke 2011;42:87–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584862 pmid:21088245

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Hodel J,
    3. Rodallec M,
    4. Gerber S, et al

    . Susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance sequences “SWAN, SWI and VenoBOLD”: technical aspects and clinical applications [in French]. J Neuroradiol 2012;39:71–86 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2011.11.006 pmid:22342939

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Hodel J,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Rodallec M, et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted angiography for the detection of high-flow intracranial vascular lesions: preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1122–30 doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2690-0 pmid:23111817

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Schmitz BL,
    3. Aschoff AJ,
    4. Hoffmann MHK, et al

    . Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2229–37 pmid:16219827

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Lee KE,
    3. Choi CG,
    4. Choi JW, et al

    . Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight MR angiography at 3.0 Tesla. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:333–39 doi:10.3348/kjr.2009.10.4.333 pmid:19568460

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Saini J,
    3. Thomas B,
    4. Bodhey NK, et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted imaging in cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:E6 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1265 pmid:18818280

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Noguchi K,
    3. Kuwayama N,
    4. Kubo M, et al

    . Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with retrograde cortical venous drainage: use of susceptibility-weighted imaging in combination with dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1903–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2231 pmid:20813875

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Gasparetto EL,
    3. Pires CE,
    4. Domingues RC

    . Susceptibility-weighted MR phase imaging can demonstrate retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage in patients with dural arteriovenous fistula. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2457 pmid:21330390

    FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Letourneau-Guillon L,
    3. Krings T

    . Simultaneous arteriovenous shunting and venous congestion identification in dural arteriovenous fistulas using susceptibility-weighted imaging: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:301–07 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2777 pmid:22051813

    Abstract/FREE Full Text