Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Index by author

May 01, 2019; Volume 40,Issue 5
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

  1. Heagerty, P.J.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
      Open Access
      Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine Injections
      F.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. Friedly
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050

      In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.

  2. Heo, Y.J.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition with Subtraction-Based MRA during the Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
      Y.J. Heo, H.W. Jeong, J.W. Baek, S.T. Kim, Y.G. Jeong, J.Y. Lee and S.-C. Jin
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 815-819; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6035
  3. Hernandez-perez, M.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult Brain
      Open Access
      Predicting Motor Outcome in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
      J. Puig, G. Blasco, M. Terceño, P. Daunis-i-Estadella, G. Schlaug, M. Hernandez-Perez, V. Cuba, G. Carbó, J. Serena, M. Essig, C.R. Figley, K. Nael, C. Leiva-Salinas, S. Pedraza and Y. Silva
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 769-775; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6038

      The authors prospectively studied patients with motor deficits secondary to primary intracerebral hemorrhage within the first 12 hours of symptom onset. Patients underwent multimodal MR imaging including DTI. Intracerebral hemorrhage, perihematomal edema location and volume, and corticospinal tract involvement were assessed. The corticospinal tract was considered affected when the tractogram passed through the intracerebral hemorrhage and/or the perihematomal edema. The authors calculated affected corticospinal tract-to-unaffected corticospinal tract ratios for fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and axial and radial diffusivities. Significant independent predictors of motor outcome were NIHSS and modified NIHSS at admission, posterior limb of the internal capsule involvement by intracerebral hemorrhage at admission, intracerebral hemorrhage volume at admission, 72-hour NIHSS, and 72-hour modified NIHSS. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for poor motor outcome at 3 months by a combined modified NIHSS of >6 and posterior limb of the internal capsule involvement in the first 12 hours from symptom onset were 84%, 79%, 65%, and 92%, respectively.

  4. Herrera, D.A.

    1. Pediatrics
      You have access
      Neuroimaging Findings in Moebius Sequence
      D.A. Herrera, N.O. Ruge, M.M. Florez, S.A. Vargas, M. Ochoa-Escudero and M. Castillo
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 862-865; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6028
  5. Hiramatsu, M.

    1. Neurointervention
      Open Access
      Visualization of Aneurysmal Neck and Dome after Coiling with 3D Multifusion Imaging of Silent MRA and FSE-MR Cisternography
      T. Satoh, T. Hishikawa, M. Hiramatsu, K. Sugiu and I. Date
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 802-807; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6026
  6. Hishikawa, T.

    1. Neurointervention
      Open Access
      Visualization of Aneurysmal Neck and Dome after Coiling with 3D Multifusion Imaging of Silent MRA and FSE-MR Cisternography
      T. Satoh, T. Hishikawa, M. Hiramatsu, K. Sugiu and I. Date
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 802-807; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6026
  7. Hiwatashi, A.

    1. FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBPediatrics
      Open Access
      Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging of Pediatric Intracranial Tumors: Correlation with Histology and Diagnostic Utility
      K. Kikuchi, A. Hiwatashi, O. Togao, K. Yamashita, R. Kamei, D. Momosaka, N. Hata, K. Iihara, S.O. Suzuki, T. Iwaki and H. Honda
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 878-884; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6052

      Between April 2013 and September 2015, seventeen children with intracranial tumors were included in this retrospective study. Intravoxel incoherent motion parameters were fitted using 13 b-values for a biexponential model. The perfusion-free diffusion coefficient, pseudodiffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were measured in high- and low-grade tumors. The authors found significant correlations between the histology and IVIM parameters of different pediatric intracranial tumors. These results suggest that IVIM imaging reflects cell density and vascularity across different types of pediatric brain tumors. They also demonstrated that both the diffusion and perfusion parameters measured on IVIM imaging are useful for grading intracranial neuroectodermal tumors in pediatric patients.

  8. Honda, H.

    1. FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBPediatrics
      Open Access
      Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging of Pediatric Intracranial Tumors: Correlation with Histology and Diagnostic Utility
      K. Kikuchi, A. Hiwatashi, O. Togao, K. Yamashita, R. Kamei, D. Momosaka, N. Hata, K. Iihara, S.O. Suzuki, T. Iwaki and H. Honda
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 878-884; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6052

      Between April 2013 and September 2015, seventeen children with intracranial tumors were included in this retrospective study. Intravoxel incoherent motion parameters were fitted using 13 b-values for a biexponential model. The perfusion-free diffusion coefficient, pseudodiffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were measured in high- and low-grade tumors. The authors found significant correlations between the histology and IVIM parameters of different pediatric intracranial tumors. These results suggest that IVIM imaging reflects cell density and vascularity across different types of pediatric brain tumors. They also demonstrated that both the diffusion and perfusion parameters measured on IVIM imaging are useful for grading intracranial neuroectodermal tumors in pediatric patients.

  9. Huang, Y.-C.

    1. Spine
      You have access
      Assessing Vascularity of Osseous Spinal Metastases with Dual-Energy CT-DSA: A Pilot Study Compared with Catheter Angiography
      Y.-C. Huang, F.-Y. Tsuang, C.-W. Lee, C.-Y. Wu and Y.-H. Lin
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 920-925; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6023
  10. Huda, F.

    1. You have access
      Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: What the Neuroradiologist Needs to Know
      H.A. Valand, F. Huda and R.K. Tu
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 766-768; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6042
« Previous (Pages : 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 23) Next »
Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 5
1 May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Sign up for alerts
Advertisement
  • Letters
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
Loading
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire