Incidental Brain MRI Findings in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Trost MJ,
   3. Robison N,
   4. Coffey D, et al

   . Changing trends in brain imaging technique for pediatric patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 2018;53:116–20 doi:10.1159/000485923 pmid:29346786

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Shoemaker JM,
   3. Cole C,
   4. Petree LE, et al

   . Evolution of universal review and disclosure of MRI reports to research participants. Brain Behav 2016;6:e00428 doi:10.1002/brb3.428 pmid:26893955

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Kim BS,
   3. Illes J,
   4. Kaplan RT, et al

   . Incidental findings on pediatric MR images of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1674–77 pmid:12427622

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Kumra S,
   3. Ashtari M,
   4. Anderson B, et al

   . Ethical and practical considerations in the management of incidental findings in pediatric MRI studies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45:1000–06 doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000222786.49477.a8 pmid:16865043

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Seki A,
   3. Uchiyama H,
   4. Fukushi T, et al

   . Incidental findings of brain magnetic resonance imaging study in a pediatric cohort in Japan and recommendation for a model management protocol. J Epidemiol 2010;20:S498–504 doi:10.2188/jea.JE20090196 pmid:20179362

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Gur RE,
   3. Kaltman D,
   4. Melhem ER, et al

   . Incidental findings in youths volunteering for brain MRI research. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2021–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3525 pmid:23811972

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Kaiser D,
   3. Leach J,
   4. Vannest J, et al

   . Unanticipated findings in pediatric neuroimaging research: prevalence of abnormalities and process for reporting and clinical follow-up. Brain Imaging Behav 2015;9:32–42 doi:10.1007/s11682-014-9327-7 pmid:25403715

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Monterrey JC,
   3. Philips J,
   4. Cleveland S, et al

   . Incidental brain MRI findings in an autism twin study. Autism Res 2017;10:113–20 doi:10.1002/aur.1720 pmid:27874265

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Jansen PR,
   3. Dremmen M,
   4. van den Berg A, et al

   . Incidental findings on brain imaging in the general pediatric population. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1593–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMc1710724 pmid:29045203

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Wolf SM,
    3. Lawrenz FP,
    4. Nelson CA, et al

    . Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:219–48 doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00281.x pmid:18547191

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Stroup DF,
    3. Berlin JA,
    4. Morton SC, et al

    . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting—Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12 doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 pmid:10789670

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Moher D,
    3. Shamseer L,
    4. Clarke M, et al

    . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4 doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 pmid:25554246

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Hardin AP,
    3. Hackell JM

    , COMMITTEE ON PRACTICE AND AMBULATORY MEDICINE. Age limit of pediatrics. Pediatrics 2017;140:e20172151 doi:10.1542/peds.2017-2151 pmid:28827380

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Vandenbroucke JP,
    3. von Elm E,
    4. Altman DG, et al

    . Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg 2014;12:1500–24 doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014 pmid:25046751

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Higgins JPT,
    3. Altman DG,
    4. Gøtzsche PC, et al

    . The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928 doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 pmid:22008217

    FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Sterne JA,
    3. Egger M

    . Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1046–55 doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8 pmid:11576817

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. White T,
    3. Muetzel RL,
    4. El Marroun H, et al

    . Paediatric population neuroimaging and the Generation R Study: the second wave. Eur J Epidemiol 2018;33:99–125 doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0319-y pmid:29064008

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Morris Z,
    3. Whiteley WN,
    4. Longstreth WT, et al

    . Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2009;339:b3016 doi:10.1136/bmj.b3016 pmid:19687093

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Vernooij MW,
    3. Ikram MA,
    4. Tanghe HL, et al

    . Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1821–28 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070972 pmid:17978290

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Jussila M-P,
    3. Olsén P,
    4. Salokorpi N, et al

    . Follow-up of pineal cysts in children: is it necessary? Neuroradiology 2017;59:1265–73 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1926-8 pmid:28942520

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Whitehead MT,
    3. Oh CC,
    4. Choudhri AF

    . Incidental pineal cysts in children who undergo 3-T MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:1577–83 doi:10.1007/s00247-013-2742-x pmid:23852563

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Maher CO,
    3. Piatt JH Jr.

    , Section on Neurologic Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics. Incidental findings on brain and spine imaging in children. Pediatrics 2015;135:e1084–96 doi:10.1542/peds.2015-0071 pmid:25825535

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Khalsa SSS,
    3. Geh N,
    4. Martin BA, et al

    . Morphometric and volumetric comparison of 102 children with symptomatic and asymptomatic Chiari malformation Type I. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018;21:65–71 doi:10.3171/2017.8.PEDS17345 pmid:29125445

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Whitson WJ,
    3. Lane JR,
    4. Bauer DF, et al

    . A prospective natural history study of nonoperatively managed Chiari I malformation: does follow-up MRI surveillance alter surgical decision making? J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;16:159–66 doi:10.3171/2014.12.PEDS14301 pmid:25932776

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Vermeer SE,
    3. Longstreth WT,
    4. Koudstaal PJ

    . Silent brain infarcts: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:611–19 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70170-9 pmid:17582361

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Eidlitz-Markus T,
    3. Zeharia A,
    4. Haimi-Cohen Y, et al

    . MRI white matter lesions in pediatric migraine. Cephalalgia 2013;33:906–13 doi:10.1177/0333102413480955 pmid:23575818

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Sotiriadis A,
    3. Makrydimas G

    . Neurodevelopment after prenatal diagnosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:337.e1–5 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.024 pmid:22284958

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Bos D,
    3. Poels MM,
    4. Adams HH, et al

    . Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study. Radiology 2016;281:507–15 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160218

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Gibson LM,
    3. Paul L,
    4. Chappell FM, et al

    . Potentially serious incidental findings on brain and body magnetic resonance imaging of apparently asymptomatic adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2018;363:k4577 doi:10.1136/bmj.k4577 pmid:30467245

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Porter KR,
    3. McCarthy BJ,
    4. Freels S, et al

    . Prevalence estimates for primary brain tumors in the United States by age, gender, behavior, and histology. Neuro Oncol 2010;12:520–27 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nop066 pmid:20511189

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science