A Qualitative and Quantitative Correlation Study of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Using Glycosaminoglycan Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer, Pfirrmann Grade, and T1-ρ

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Allegri M,
   3. Montella S,
   4. Salici F, et al

   . Mechanisms of low back pain: a guide for diagnosis and therapy. F1000Res 2016;5:1530 doi:10.12688/f1000research.8105.2 pmid:27408698

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Manchikanti L,
   3. Singh V,
   4. Pampati V, et al

   . Evaluation of the relative contributions of various structures in chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 2001;4:308–16 pmid:16902676

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Phillips FM,
   3. An H,
   4. Kang JD, et al

   . Biologic treatment for intervertebral disc degeneration: summary statement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:S99 pmid:12897482

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Vadalà G,
   3. Sowa GA,
   4. Kang JD

   . Gene therapy for disc degeneration. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2007;7:185–96 doi:10.1517/14712598.7.2.185 pmid:17250457

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Carl A,
   3. Ledet E,
   4. Yuan H, et al

   . New developments in nucleus pulposus replacement technology. Spine J 2004;4(6 Suppl):325S–29S pmid:15541685

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Adams MA,
   3. Roughley PJ

   . What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2151–61 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000231761.73859.2c pmid:16915105

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Lyons G,
   3. Eisenstein SM,
   4. Sweet MB

   . Biochemical changes in intervertebral disc degeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981;673:443–53 doi:10.1016/0304-4165(81)90476-1 pmid:7225426

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Urban JP,
   3. McMullin JF

   . Swelling pressure of the inervertebral disc: influence of proteoglycan and collagen contents. Biorheology 1985;22:145–57 doi:10.3233/BIR-1985-22205 pmid:3986322

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Pfirrmann CW,
   3. Metzdorf A,
   4. Zanetti M, et al

   . Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1873–78 doi:10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011 pmid:11568697

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Li X,
    3. Cheng J,
    4. Lin K, et al

    . Quantitative MRI using T1ρ and T2 in human osteoarthritic cartilage specimens: correlation with biochemical measurements and histology. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:324–34 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2010.09.004 pmid:21130590

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Blumenkrantz G,
    3. Zuo J,
    4. Li X, et al

    . In vivo 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation mapping in subjects with intervertebral disc degeneration and clinical symptoms. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:1193–200 doi:10.1002/mrm.22362 pmid:20432290

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Antoniou J,
    3. Epure LM,
    4. Michalek AJ, et al

    . Analysis of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and biomechanical parameters on human discs with different grades of degeneration. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:1402–14 doi:10.1002/jmri.24120 pmid:23633131

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Paul CPL,
    3. Smit TH,
    4. de Graaf M, et al

    . Quantitative MRI in early intervertebral disc degeneration: T1rho correlates better than T2 and ADC with biomechanics, histology and matrix content. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191442 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191442 pmid:29381716

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Menezes NM,
    3. Gray ML,
    4. Hartke JR, et al

    . T2 and T1rho MRI in articular cartilage systems. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:503–09 doi:10.1002/mrm.10710 pmid:15004791

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Takayama Y,
    3. Hatakenaka M,
    4. Tsushima H, et al

    . T1ρ is superior to T2 mapping for the evaluation of articular cartilage denaturalization with osteoarthritis: radiological-pathological correlation after total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e192–98 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.031 pmid:23265927

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Johannessen W,
    3. Auerbach JD,
    4. Wheaton AJ, et al

    . Assessment of human disc degeneration and proteoglycan content using T1rho-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1253–57 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000217708.54880.51 pmid:16688040

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Ward KM,
    3. Aletras AH,
    4. Balaban RS

    . A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson 2000;143:79–87 doi:10.1006/jmre.1999.1956 pmid:10698648

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Woods M,
    3. Woessner DE,
    4. Sherry AD

    . Paramagnetic lanthanide complexes as PARACEST agents for medical imaging. Chem Soc Rev 2006;35:500–11 doi:10.1039/b509907m pmid:16729144

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. van Zijl PC,
    3. Yadav NN

    . Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't? Magn Reson Med 2011;65:927–48 doi:10.1002/mrm.22761 pmid:21337419

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Ling W,
    3. Regatte RR,
    4. Navon G, et al

    . Assessment of glycosaminoglycan concentration in vivo by chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:2266–70 doi:10.1073/pnas.0707666105 pmid:18268341

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Kim M,
    3. Chan Q,
    4. Anthony MP, et al

    . Assessment of glycosaminoglycan distribution in human lumbar intervertebral discs using chemical exchange saturation transfer at 3 T: feasibility and initial experience. NMR Biomed 2011;24:1137–44 doi:10.1002/nbm.1671 pmid:21387446

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Haneder S,
    3. Apprich SR,
    4. Schmitt B, et al

    . Assessment of glycosaminoglycan content in intervertebral discs using chemical exchange saturation transfer at 3.0 Tesla: preliminary results in patients with low-back pain. Eur Radiol 2013;23:861–68 doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2660-6 pmid:23052643

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Keupp J,
    3. Baltes C,
    4. Harvey P, et al

    . Parallel RF transmission based MRI technique for highly sensitive detection of amide proton transfer in the human brain at 3T. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montréal, Québec, Canada. May 7–13, 2011;19:710
24. 24.↵
    2. Togao O,
    3. Hiwatashi A,
    4. Keupp J, et al

    . Scan-rescan reproducibility of parallel transmission based amide proton transfer imaging of brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1346–53 doi:10.1002/jmri.24895 pmid:25828573

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Müller-Lutz A,
    3. Schleich C,
    4. Pentang G, et al

    . Age-dependency of glycosaminoglycan content in lumbar discs: a 3T gagcEST study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1517–23 doi:10.1002/jmri.24945 pmid:25970563

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Schleich C,
    3. Müller-Lutz A,
    4. Matuschke F, et al

    . Glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer of lumbar intervertebral discs in patients with spondyloarthritis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1057–63 doi:10.1002/jmri.24877 pmid:25758361

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Kim M,
    3. Gillen J,
    4. Landman BA, et al

    . Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1441–50 doi:10.1002/mrm.21873 pmid:19358232

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Wei W,
    3. Jia G,
    4. Flanigan D, et al

    . Chemical exchange saturation transfer MR imaging of articular cartilage glycosaminoglycans at 3 T: accuracy of B0 field inhomogeneity corrections with gradient echo method. Magn Reson Imaging 2014;32:41–47 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.07.009 pmid:24119460

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Keupp J,
    3. Eggers H

    . CEST-DIXON MRI for sensitive and accurate measurement of amide proton transfer in humans at 3T. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology. Stockholm, Sweden. May 1–7, 2010
30. 30.↵
    2. Togao O,
    3. Keupp J,
    4. Hiwatashi A, et al

    . Amide proton transfer imaging of brain tumors using a self-corrected 3D fast spin-echo Dixon method: comparison with separate B0 correction. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:2272–79 doi:10.1002/mrm.26322 pmid:27385636

    CrossRefPubMed