Radiation Dosimetry of 3D Rotational Neuroangiography and 2D-DSA in Children

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Honarmand A,
   3. Gemmete J,
   4. Hurley M, et al

   . Adjunctive value of intra-arterial cone beam CT angiography relative to DSA in the evaluation of cranial and spinal arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;7:517–23 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011139 pmid:24821841

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Safain M,
   3. Rahal J,
   4. Patel S, et al

   . Superior performance of conebeam CT angiography in characterization of intracranial atherosclerosis. J Neurosurg 2014;121:441–49 doi:10.3171/2014.5.JNS132201 pmid:24949672

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Schulz C,
   3. Schmitt M,
   4. Böckler D, et al

   . Intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography to assess technical success during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:577–84 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.045 pmid:27106245

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Patel N,
   3. Gounis M,
   4. Wakhloo A, et al

   . Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam CT of cerebrovascular stents: experimental optimization and clinical application. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:137–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2239 pmid:20966059

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Namba K,
   3. Niimi Y,
   4. Song J, et al

   . Use of Dyna-CT angiography in neuroendovascular decision-making: a case report. Interv Neuroradiol 2009;15:67–72 doi:10.1177/159101990901500110 pmid:20465931

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Orth R,
   3. Wallace M,
   4. Kuo M

   ; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:S538–44 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.026 pmid:19560038

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Muthusami P,
   3. Shkumat N,
   4. Rea V, et al

   . CT reconstruction and MRI fusion of 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of pediatric cerebrovascular lesions. Neuroradiology 2017;59:625–33 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1818-y pmid:28349170

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Wallace M,
   3. Kuo M,
   4. Glaiberman C, et al

   ; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT: applications in the interventional suite. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:799–813 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.02.018 pmid:18503893

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Thierry-Chef I,
   3. Simon S,
   4. Miller D

   . Radiation dose and cancer risk among pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:159–62 doi:10.1007/s00247-006-0206-2 pmid:16862414

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Orbach D,
    3. Stamoulis C,
    4. Strauss K, et al

    . Neurointerventions in children: radiation exposure and its import. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:650–56 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3758 pmid:24157736

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Wielandts J,
    3. De Buck S,
    4. Ector J, et al

    . Three-dimensional cardiac rotational angiography: effective radiation dose and image quality implications. Europace 2010;12:194–201 doi:10.1093/europace/eup394 pmid:20022880

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Peters M,
    3. Krings G,
    4. Koster M, et al

    . Effective radiation dosage of three-dimensional rotational angiography in children. Europace 2015;17:611–16 doi:10.1093/europace/euu207 pmid:25168838

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Kim S,
    3. Yoshizumi T,
    4. Frush D, et al

    . Radiation dose from cone beam CT in a pediatric phantom: risk estimation of cancer incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:186–90 doi:10.2214/AJR.08.2168 pmid:20028922

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Wang C,
    3. Nguyen G,
    4. Toncheva G, et al

    . Evaluation of patient effective dose of neurovascular imaging protocols for C-arm cone-beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:1072–77 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11001 pmid:24758663

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Wielandts J,
    3. Smans K,
    4. Ector J, et al

    . Effective dose analysis of three-dimensional rotational angiography during catheter ablation procedures. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:563–79 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/3/001 pmid:20057012

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Bai M,
    3. Liu X,
    4. Liu B

    . Effective patient dose during neuroradiological C-arm CT procedures. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013;19:29–32 doi:10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5852-12.0 pmid:23266966

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Lin P,
    3. Schueler B,
    4. Balter S, et al

    . Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: a report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190. Med Phys 2015;42:6815–29 doi:10.1118/1.4934831 pmid:26632039

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Tapiovaara M,
    3. Siiskonen T

    . PCXMC: a Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations. Helsinki: STUK; 2008
19. 19.↵
    The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1–332 doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003 pmid:18082557

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Khodadadegan Y,
    3. Zhang M,
    4. Pavlicek W, et al

    . Validation and initial clinical use of automatic peak skin dose localization with fluoroscopic and interventional procedures. Radiology 2013;266:246–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.12112295 pmid:23143024

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Kwon D,
    3. Little M,
    4. Miller D

    . Reference air kerma and kerma-area product as estimators of peak skin dose for fluoroscopically guided interventions. Med Phys 2011;38:4196–204 doi:10.1118/1.3590358 pmid:21859021

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Vano E,
    3. Fernandez J,
    4. Sanchez R, et al

    . Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:277–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3211 pmid:22859286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006
24. 24.↵
    2. Chida K,
    3. Saito H,
    4. Otani H, et al

    . Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:774–78 doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1653 pmid:16498105

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Chida K,
    3. Ohno T,
    4. Kakizaki S, et al

    . Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1175–79 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4466 pmid:20966324

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Manica J,
    3. Borges M,
    4. Medeiros R, et al

    . A comparison of radiation dose between standard and 3D angiography in congenital heart disease [in English, Portuguese]. Arg Bras Cardiol 2014;103:131–37 pmid:25211313

    PubMed
27. 27.↵
    Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Medical Procedures. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report No. 168 2010
28. 28.↵
    2. McCollough C,
    3. Christner J,
    4. Kofler J

    . How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:890–96 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.4179 pmid:20308487

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science