Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of the Thalamus: Relationships with Thalamic Volume, Total Gray Matter Volume, and T2 Lesion Burden

G.C. Chiang, J. Hu, E. Morris, Y. Wang and S.A. Gauthier
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2018, 39 (3) 467-472; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5537
G.C. Chiang
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (G.C.C., J.H., Y.W.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G.C. Chiang
J. Hu
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (G.C.C., J.H., Y.W.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Hu
E. Morris
bNeurology (E.M., S.A.G.), Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Morris
Y. Wang
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (G.C.C., J.H., Y.W.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Wang
S.A. Gauthier
bNeurology (E.M., S.A.G.), Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.A. Gauthier
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Both thalamic iron deposition and atrophy have been reported in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with healthy controls, but how they are related is unclear. The purpose of this study was to understand the pathophysiologic basis for this iron deposition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis underwent 3T MR imaging with a standardized protocol that included quantitative susceptibility mapping to measure iron concentration and a 3D T1 echo-spoiled gradient-echo sequence to obtain thalamic volumes. Volumes of interest were manually delineated on the quantitative susceptibility map to encompass both thalami. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify the association between thalamic susceptibility and volume. Associations between thalamic susceptibility and total gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and T2 lesion volume were also assessed.

RESULTS: The relative susceptibility of the thalamus was associated with T2 lesion volume (P = .015) and was higher in the presence of enhancing lesions (P = .013). The relative susceptibility of the thalami was not associated with thalamic volumes, total gray matter volumes, or cortical thickness (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Iron levels in the thalami are associated with T2 lesion burden and the presence of enhancing lesions, but not with thalamic or gray matter volumes, suggesting that iron accumulation is associated with white matter inflammation rather than gray matter neurodegeneration.

ABBREVIATION:

QSM
quantitative susceptibility mapping

Thalamic atrophy has been reported to be an early finding in patients with multiple sclerosis1⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–7 and may result from growth factor depletion after lesional transection of thalamocortical fibers8⇓–10 or nonlesional microstructural degeneration.11 Iron accumulation in the thalamus has also been widely reported,1,3,4,12⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–18 but it is unclear how it relates to the observed thalamic degeneration.

One possibility is that iron may be an epiphenomenon of thalamic neurodegeneration,19 as has been described in several neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,20 Alzheimer disease,21 and Parkinson disease.21 Alternatively, iron may accumulate as a result of inflammation along tracts that connect with the thalamus, with activated microglia along these tracts expressing high levels of ferritin22⇓⇓–25 and iron being released by degenerating oligodendrocytes and myelin fibers. As iron imaging becomes more recognized as a marker of disease in multiple sclerosis,26 it will become increasingly important to understand the pathophysiologic basis for changes in iron relative to existing markers of atrophy and lesion burden.

The primary aim of our study was therefore to determine the relationship between iron levels in the thalami and thalamic atrophy, using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), an MR imaging technique used to quantify tissue iron concentrations.27 Second, we evaluated whether iron levels in the thalami are associated with T2 lesion burden and the presence of enhancing lesions, reflective of white matter inflammation. Finally, we evaluated whether iron levels in the thalami are associated with markers of global gray matter neurodegeneration, including total gray matter volume and cortical thickness.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

One hundred patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from an ongoing, prospective cohort of patients, followed at our Multiple Sclerosis Center from August 2013 through March 2015, were initially included in this retrospective analysis. For homogeneity of the cohort, patients with primary-progressive multiple sclerosis were not included. Five patients were excluded due to poor imaging quality of the QSM or the T1-weighted anatomic sequence, leaving 95 patients in our final analysis. All subjects gave written informed consent for participation in this study, which was approved by our institutional review board. Patient age, sex, use of disease-modifying therapies at the time of the MR imaging, and disease duration since the first clinical symptom were obtained from the medical record.

MR Imaging Data Acquisition and Analysis

All patients underwent our standardized multiple sclerosis research protocol on a 3T scanner (Signa HDxt; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with an 8-channel phased array head coil. The imaging protocol included the following: 1) a 3D T2*-weighted spoiled multiecho gradient recalled-echo sequence (TR/TE = 57/4.3 ms, flip angle = 20°, 416 × 320 matrix, 0.5 × 0.5 × 2 mm3 resolution); 2) a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence (TR/TE = 5250/86 ms, flip angle = 90°, 3-mm sections, 416 × 256 matrix); 3) a 3D T2 FLAIR sequence (TR/TE = 6050/140 ms, 0.6 × 0.6 × 1.2 mm3 resolution); and 4) a pre- and postgadolinium 3D inversion recovery–prepared T1-weighted fast echo-spoiled gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE = 8.8/3.4 ms, flip angle = 15°, 256 × 256 matrix, 0.45 × 0.45 × 1.2 mm3 resolution). QSM was reconstructed from the gradient recalled-echo sequence using the morphology-enabled dipole inversion method.28

The volumetric 3D T1-weighted images were aligned, skull-stripped, and segmented by using FreeSurfer software, Version 5.1 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) to obtain thalamic volumes (Fig 1).29 The left and right thalamic volumes were summed to obtain the total thalamic volume in cubic millimeters. FreeSurfer was also used to obtain total gray matter volume and cortical thickness. 3D T1-weighted images were first segmented into gray matter masks, which were visually checked and manually edited for misclassification. The cortical thickness measurement was then calculated as the shortest distance between each point on the pial surface and the gray/white surface, measured in millimeters. All FreeSurfer analyses were performed by a trained senior research aide with 3 years of experience (E.M.) and visually checked for anatomic accuracy by both the aide and a board-certified neurologist (S.A.G.).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Axial images through the thalami from the 3D T1 MPRAGE sequence (A), with an overlaid gray matter mask (B) and volumetric segmentation (C) from FreeSurfer. Thalamic volumes of interest are shown in green. The quantitative susceptibility map image from the same axial level (D) shows the contoured right thalamus (black outline). The pial boundary (E) is used for cortical thickness estimation, and the segmentation outline (F) is overlaid on the axial T1-weighted image.

The volume of T2-hyperintense white matter lesion load was calculated using FDA-approved software (Olea Sphere 2.3; Olea Medical, La Ciotat, France) (Fig 2). Briefly, 3D volumes of the white matter lesions were created by selecting a seed voxel at the center of the lesions and expanding the volumes of interest to include surrounding voxels of similar signal intensities across all slices. Manual editing was then performed to include or exclude voxels as necessary on the basis of visual inspection.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Axial image from the 3D T2 FLAIR sequence (A) with overlaid volumetric segmentation of T2 lesions (purple) (B) from Olea software processing in the same patient as in Fig 1.

Iron concentrations of the thalami were determined by using syngo.via software (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). First, QSM maps were fused to the 3D T2 FLAIR images for improved anatomic delineation. Then, with the Volume-of-Interest tool, the upper and lower borders of the thalami were manually delineated by a board-certified radiologist with subspecialty certification in neuroradiology (G.C.C.) (Fig 1). The Contour tool then identified the appropriate margins for the thalami on the intervening slices in semiautomated fashion, and the Nudge tool was used to exclude major veins that could confound the QSM values, particularly the internal cerebral veins and basal veins of Rosenthal. As a zero reference, a small circular ROI was also placed in the CSF in the atrium of each lateral ventricle, adjacent to the thalamus. The relative susceptibility within the thalami was calculated by subtracting the mean susceptibility in the thalami from that in the CSF ROI.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed in STATA, Version 13 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas). A sample size of 95 was determined to have 80% power to detect a correlation coefficient of 0.28 between variables with a 2-sided α of .05.30

Multivariate regression analyses were used to determine whether the relative susceptibility of the thalami was associated with thalamic atrophy, T2 white matter lesion volumes, the presence of enhancing lesions, total gray matter volume, and cortical thickness. Ladder-of-powers quantile-normal plots were assessed to determine the normality of the outcome variables. White matter lesion volume was log-transformed for normalization. Age, sex, disease duration, and use of disease-modifying therapies were included as covariates.

To exclude the potential confounder of age-related T2 white matter lesions on lesion volume, we also repeated the analysis excluding all patients older than 50 years of age.

Results

The mean age of the patients included in this study was 42 ± 10 years, with a range of 25–71 years. Two-thirds of the cohort was female, and one-third, male, reflecting the higher disease prevalence in women. The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 2.2 ± 2.2, with a range of 0–8.5. Fifty-seven of the 95 patients were on disease-modifying agents. Nine had enhancing lesions at the time of the scan. The mean duration of disease since the patient's first reported symptom was 8.9 ± 7.8 years, with a range of 0.3–33.7 years. The mean volume of white matter lesions was 11.0 ± 15.8 mL, with a range of 0.1–122.4 mL. The mean total thalamic volume was 14.0 ± 2.1 mL, with a range of 8.4–20.0 mL. The mean relative susceptibility of the thalami was −29.0 ± 11.7 parts per billion, with a range of −61.5 to 6.4 parts per billion. The mean total gray matter volume was 607 ± 67 mL, with a range of 411–784 mL. The mean cortical thickness was 2.40 ± 0.16 mm, with a range of 1.92–2.68 mm.

The results of the regression analyses are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The relative susceptibility of the thalami was associated with T2 lesion volume both before (P = .037) and after adjusting for covariates (P = .015), with higher thalamic susceptibility associated with a greater T2 lesion burden. Repeating the analysis with patients younger than 50 years of age did not change the results (P = .036), suggesting that age-related white matter lesions were not a significant confounder. Longer disease duration was also associated with greater T2 lesion burden (P < .001), whereas age (P = .25), sex (P = .90), and use of disease-modifying agents (P = .81) were not.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Results of the regression analyses evaluating associations between thalamic susceptibility and thalamic volume, total gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and T2 lesion volume

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Results of the regression analyses evaluating whether thalamic susceptibility is associated with baseline characteristics

The presence of enhancing lesions was also associated with higher iron levels before (P = .04) and after (P = .013) adjustment for covariates. Older age was associated with higher iron levels only after adjustment (P = .028).

The relative susceptibility of the thalami was not associated with thalamic volumes, total gray matter volume, or cortical thickness (P = .63, 0.16, and 0.94, respectively).

Discussion

Both thalamic atrophy3⇓⇓⇓–7 and iron deposition1,3,4,12⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–18 have been reported in patients with multiple sclerosis, but whether these 2 processes are interrelated is unclear. Using QSM to quantify tissue susceptibility, which correlates with iron concentrations in postmortem specimens27,31,32 and is less sensitive to local changes in water content than R2*,33⇓⇓–36 we found no association between thalamic susceptibility and volume. On the other hand, we found that thalamic susceptibility was associated with overall T2 lesion burden and the presence of enhancing lesions.

Several prior studies have described increased thalamic iron levels among patients with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome compared with healthy controls.3,4,13,14,17,18 One explanation for this increased iron could be that iron accumulates because of thalamic neurodegeneration. Studies have shown that as neurodegeneration occurs, activated microglia and tissue macrophages that arrive to clear out the iron-rich cellular debris express high levels of ferritin,23⇓–25 perpetuating ongoing oxidative stress, neurodegeneration, and iron accumulation.37⇓–39 A postmortem study of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis confirmed this link between neurodegeneration and iron accumulation, with the susceptibility detected on MR imaging corresponding to iron-rich microglia in the motor cortex.20 Another study described iron accumulation as an epiphenomenon of neuronal damage because iron levels in the basal ganglia of patients with multiple sclerosis were closely associated with the degree of gray matter atrophy and were not elevated early in the disease course in patients with clinically isolated syndrome.19

However, in our cohort, we found no association between iron levels in the thalamic nuclei and thalamic atrophy, suggesting that these may be disparate processes. Our finding is consistent with a prior longitudinal study that reported that short-term changes in iron levels in the deep gray matter of patients with multiple sclerosis appear to occur independent of changes in volume.1 We further found no association between thalamic iron levels and markers of gray matter neurodegeneration, including total gray matter volume and cortical thickness, suggesting that iron accumulation and gray matter neurodegeneration are likely independent processes.

On the other hand, we found that thalamic iron levels were associated with markers of white matter inflammation, including overall T2 lesion burden and the presence of enhancing lesions. Several prior studies have shown that proinflammatory cytokines seen in patients with multiple sclerosis, such as tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1, and interferon γ, lead to increases in ferritin40⇓–42 and iron accumulation in the deep gray matter.42,43 Demyelinating lesions disrupting tracts that connect with the thalamus may also result in inflammation, microglial activation, and iron accumulation in the thalami. Studies in animal models have shown that a chemical injection in the region of the striatum results in iron accumulation, not just locally, but also in distant interconnected regions.44,45 In patients, activated microglia expressing ferritin have also been detected along tracts affected by acute subcortical ischemia as an indicator of poststroke inflammation.46 We hypothesize that white matter lesions and inflammation taken together lead to axonal transaction and white matter degeneration in tracts that connect to the thalamus, resulting in thalamic iron accumulation. Although age-related iron accumulation was also noted in our cohort, as has been described in the literature,47 adjusting for age did not weaken the association between the presence of enhancing lesions and thalamic iron accumulation.

This study has several limitations. First, we used manual segmentation of the thalami, which limits reproducibility and use in larger cohorts but better avoids venous contamination of QSM parameters. Second, we did not acquire diffusion tensor imaging data to determine the burden of lesions along specific thalamocortical tracts, which may contribute to iron accumulation. Third, we did not include patients with primary-progressive multiple sclerosis; iron in these patients may accumulate via a different pathophysiologic mechanism. Finally, further confirmation of these findings in larger cohorts is necessary.

Conclusions

Using QSM, we found that iron concentrations in the thalami are associated with T2 lesion burden and the presence of enhancing lesions, both imaging markers of white matter inflammation. Iron concentrations were not found to be associated with local thalamic or global gray matter neurodegeneration.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: James Hu—RELATED: Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Weill Cornell, Comments: research award. Yi Wang—RELATED: Grant: National Institutes of Health, Comments: R01NS090464*; UNRELATED: Grant: National Institutes of Health, Comments: R01NS095562, S10OD021782*; Patents (Planned, Pending or Issued): QSM patents*; Stock/Stock Options: Medimagemetric, Comments: Medimagemetric is working with Cornell on commercialization of QSM technology. Susan A. Gauthier—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Novartis, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt.* *Money paid to the institution.

  • This work was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/Clinical and Translational Science Center grant (UL1 TR000457-06), the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant (R01NS090464), and the Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Medical Student Research Award.

  • Paper previously presented, in part, at: Annual Meeting of the America Society of Neuroradiology, May 21–26, 2016; Washington, DC.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Khalil M,
    2. Langkammer C,
    3. Pichler A, et al
    . Dynamics of brain iron levels in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal 3T MRI study. Neurology 2015;84:2396–402 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001679 pmid:25979698
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cifelli A,
    2. Arridge M,
    3. Jezzard P, et al
    . Thalamic neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2002;52:650–53 doi:10.1002/ana.10326 pmid:12402265
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hagemeier J,
    2. Yeh EA,
    3. Brown MH, et al
    . Iron content of the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus is increased in adolescent multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013;19:567–76 doi:10.1177/1352458512459289 pmid:22968543
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zivadinov R,
    2. Heininen-Brown M,
    3. Schirda CV, et al
    . Abnormal subcortical deep-gray matter susceptibility-weighted imaging filtered phase measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Neuroimage 2012;59:331–39 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.045 pmid:21820063
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bergsland N,
    2. Zivadinov R,
    3. Dwyer MG, et al
    . Localized atrophy of the thalamus and slowed cognitive processing speed in MS patients. Mult Scler 2016;22:1327–36 doi:10.1177/1352458515616204 pmid:26541795
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Schoonheim MM,
    2. Hulst HE,
    3. Brandt RB, et al
    . Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2015;84:776–83 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001285 pmid:25616483
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ramasamy DP,
    2. Benedict RH,
    3. Cox JL, et al
    . Extent of cerebellum, subcortical and cortical atrophy in patients with MS: a case-control study. J Neurol Sci 2009;282:47–54 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.034 pmid:19201003
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mosca TJ,
    2. Hong W,
    3. Dani VS, et al
    . Trans-synaptic Teneurin signalling in neuromuscular synapse or organization and target choice. Nature 2012;484:237–41 doi:10.1038/nature10923 pmid:22426000
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Nikoletopoulou V,
    2. Lickert H,
    3. Frade JM, et al
    . Neurotrophin receptors TrkA and TrkC cause neuronal death whereas TrkB does not. Nature 2010;467:59–63 doi:10.1038/nature09336 pmid:20811452
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rocca MA,
    2. Mesaros S,
    3. Pagani E, et al
    . Thalamic damage and long-term progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2010;257:463–69 doi:10.1148/radiol.10100326 pmid:20724544
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Deppe M,
    2. Krämer J,
    3. Tenberge JG, et al
    . Early silent microstructural degeneration and atrophy of the thalamocortical network in multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2016;37:1866–79 doi:10.1002/hbm.23144 pmid:26920497
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Modica CM,
    2. Zivadinov R,
    3. Dwyer MG, et al
    . Iron and volume in the deep gray matter: association with cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:57–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3998 pmid:24948507
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Al-Radaideh AM,
    2. Wharton SJ,
    3. Lim SY, et al
    . Increased iron accumulation occurs in the earliest stages of demyelinating disease: an ultra-high field susceptibility mapping study in clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler 2013;19:896–903 doi:10.1177/1352458512465135 pmid:23139386
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hagemeier J,
    2. Weinstock-Guttman B,
    3. Bergland N, et al
    . Iron deposition on SWI-filtered phase in the subcortical deep gray matter of patients with clinically isolated syndrome may precede structure-specific atrophy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1596–601 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3030 pmid:22460343
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cobzas D,
    2. Sun H,
    3. Walsh AJ, et al
    . Subcortical gray matter segmentation and voxel-based analysis using transverse relaxation and quantitative susceptibility mapping with application to multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1601–10 doi:10.1002/jmri.24951 pmid:25980643
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ge Y,
    2. Jensen JH,
    3. Lu H, et al
    . Quantitative assessment of iron accumulation in the deep gray matter of multiple sclerosis by magnetic field correlation imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1639–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0646 pmid:17893225
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lebel RM,
    2. Eissa A,
    3. Seres P, et al
    . Quantitative high-field imaging of sub-cortical gray matter in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2012;18:433–41 doi:10.1177/1352458511428464 pmid:22032862
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Quinn MP,
    2. Gati JS,
    3. Klassen ML, et al
    . Increased deep gray matter iron is present in clinically isolated syndromes. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2014;3:194–202 doi:10.1016/j.msard.2013.06.017 pmid:25878007
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Khalil M,
    2. Langkammer C,
    3. Ropele S, et al
    . Determinants of brain iron in multiple sclerosis: a quantitative 3T MRI study. Neurology 2011;77:1691–97 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318236ef0e pmid:21975210
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kwan JY,
    2. Jeong SY,
    3. Van Gelderen P, et al
    . Iron accumulation in deep cortical layers account for MRI signal abnormalities in ALS: correlating 7 Tesla MRI and pathology. PLoS One 2012;7:e35241 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035241 pmid:22529995
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zecca L,
    2. Youdim MB,
    3. Riederer P, et al
    . Iron, brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004;5:863–73 doi:10.1038/nrn1537 pmid:15496864
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Haider L,
    2. Simeonidou C,
    3. Steinberger G, et al
    . Multiple sclerosis deep grey matter: the relation between demyelination, neurodegeneration, inflammation and iron. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:1386–95 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-307712 pmid:24899728
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Garden GA,
    2. Möller T
    . Microglia biology in health and disease. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2006;1:127–37 doi:10.1007/s11481-006-9015-5 pmid:18040779
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Cheepsunthorn P,
    2. Radov L,
    3. Menzies S, et al
    . Characterization of a novel brain-derived microglial cell line isolated from neonatal rat brain. Glia 2001;35:53–62 doi:10.1002/glia.1070 pmid:11424192
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Andersen HH,
    2. Johnsen KB,
    3. Moos T
    . Iron deposits in the chronically inflamed central nervous system and contributes to neurodegeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014;71:1607–22 doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1509-8 pmid:24218010
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Walsh AJ,
    2. Blevins G,
    3. Lebel RM, et al
    . Longitudinal MR imaging of iron in multiple sclerosis: an imaging marker of disease. Radiology 2014;270:186–96 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130474 pmid:23925273
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Langkammer C,
    2. Schweser F,
    3. Krebs N, et al
    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. Neuroimage 2012;62:1593–99 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.049 pmid:22634862
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Liu T,
    3. de Rochefort L, et al
    . Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage 2012;59:2560–68 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.082 pmid:21925276
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Fischl B,
    2. Salat DH,
    3. Busa E, et al
    . Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33:341–55 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00569-X pmid:11832223
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mukaka MM
    . Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 2012;24:69–71 pmid:23638278
    PubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Wisnieff C,
    2. Ramanan S,
    3. Olesik J, et al
    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of white matter multiple sclerosis lesions: interpreting positive susceptibility and the presence of iron. Magn Reson Med 2015;74:564–70 doi:10.1002/mrm.25420 pmid:25137340
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Sun H,
    2. Walsh AJ,
    3. Lebel RM, et al
    . Validation of quantitative susceptibility mapping with Perls' iron staining for subcortical gray matter. Neuroimage 2015;105:486–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.010 pmid:25462797
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Schmalbrock P,
    2. Prakash RS,
    3. Schirda B, et al
    . Basal ganglia iron in patients with multiple sclerosis measured with 7T quantitative susceptibility mapping correlates with inhibitory control. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:439–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4599 pmid:26611996
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Liu T
    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:82–101 doi:10.1002/mrm.25358 pmid:25044035
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Schweser F,
    2. Deistung A,
    3. Lehr BW, et al
    . Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med Phys 2010;37:5165–78 doi:10.1118/1.3481505 pmid:21089750
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Miao Y,
    3. Liu M, et al
    . Correlation of putative iron content as represented by changes in R2* and phase with age in deep gray matter of healthy adults. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:561–76 doi:10.1002/jmri.22293 pmid:20815053
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Barbeito AG,
    2. Garringer HJ,
    3. Baraibar MA, et al
    . Abnormal iron metabolism and oxidative stress in mice expressing a mutant form of the ferritin light polypeptide gene. J Neurochem 2009;109:1067–78 doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06028.x pmid:19519778
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Deng X,
    2. Vidal R,
    3. Englander EW
    . Accumulation of oxidative DNA damage in brain mitochondria in mouse model of hereditary ferritinopathy. Neurosci Lett 2010;479:44–48 doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.025 pmid:20478358
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Pelizzoni I,
    2. Macco R,
    3. Morini MF, et al
    . Iron handling in hippocampal neurons: activity-dependent iron entry and mitochondria-mediated neurotoxicity. Aging Cell 2011;10:172–83 doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00652.x pmid:21108725
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Rogers JT,
    2. Bridges KR,
    3. Durmowicz GP, et al
    . Translational control during the acute phase response: ferritin synthesis in response to interleukin-1. J Biol Chem 1990;265:14572–78 pmid:1696948
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tsuji Y,
    2. Miller LL,
    3. Miller SC, et al
    . Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 1-alpha regulate transferrin receptor in human diploid fibroblasts. Relationship to the induction of ferritin heavy chain. J Biol Chem 1991;266:7257–61 pmid:2016326
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Smirnov IM,
    2. Bailey K,
    3. Flowers CH, et al
    . Effects of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta on iron metabolism by A549 cells and influence on cytotoxicity. Am J Physiol 1999;277:L257–63 pmid:10444519
    PubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Williams R,
    2. Rohr AM,
    3. Wang WT, et al
    . Iron deposition is independent of cellular inflammation in a cerebral model of multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurosci 2011;12:59 doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-59 pmid:21699685
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Shoham S,
    2. Werman E,
    3. Ebstein RP
    . Iron accumulation in the rat basal ganglia after excitatory amino acid injections: dissociation from neuronal loss. Exp Neurol 1992;118:227–41 doi:10.1016/0014-4886(92)90039-S pmid:1426129
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Sastry S,
    2. Arendash GW
    . Time-dependent changes in iron levels and associated neuronal loss within the substantia nigra following lesions within the neostriatum/globus pallidus complex. Neuroscience 1995;67:649–66 doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)00618-F pmid:7545796
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Radlinska BA,
    2. Ghinani SA,
    3. Lyon P, et al
    . Multimodal microglia imaging of fiber tracts in acute subcortical stroke. Ann Neurol 2009;66:825–32 doi:10.1002/ana.21796 pmid:20035510
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Aquino D,
    2. Bizzi A,
    3. Grisoli M, et al
    . Age-related iron deposition in the basal ganglia: quantitative analysis in healthy subjects. Radiology 2009;252:165–72 doi:10.1148/radiol.2522081399 pmid:19561255
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 24, 2017.
  • Accepted after revision November 15, 2017.
  • © 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 39 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 39, Issue 3
1 Mar 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of the Thalamus: Relationships with Thalamic Volume, Total Gray Matter Volume, and T2 Lesion Burden
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
G.C. Chiang, J. Hu, E. Morris, Y. Wang, S.A. Gauthier
Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of the Thalamus: Relationships with Thalamic Volume, Total Gray Matter Volume, and T2 Lesion Burden
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2018, 39 (3) 467-472; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5537

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of the Thalamus: Relationships with Thalamic Volume, Total Gray Matter Volume, and T2 Lesion Burden
G.C. Chiang, J. Hu, E. Morris, Y. Wang, S.A. Gauthier
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2018, 39 (3) 467-472; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5537
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Innate Immune Cell-Related Pathology in the Thalamus Signals a Risk for Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire