Clinical Evaluation of Highly Accelerated Compressed Sensing Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Mozaffarian D,
   3. Benjamin EJ,
   4. Go AS, et al

   Writing Group Members, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee, Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2016 update—a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016;133:e38–360 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350 pmid:26673558

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Arenillas JF

   . Intracranial atherosclerosis: current concepts. Stroke 2011;42:S20–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597278 pmid:21164126

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Mazighi M,
   3. Labreuche J,
   4. Gongora-Rivera F, et al

   . Autopsy prevalence of intracranial atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke. Stroke 2008;39:1142–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496513 pmid:18309170

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Bui TD,
   3. Gelfand D,
   4. Whipple S, et al

   . Comparison of CT and catheter arteriography for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2005;39:481–90 doi:10.1177/153857440503900604 pmid:16382269

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Schernthaner R,
   3. Stadler A,
   4. Lomoschitz F, et al

   . Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses. Eur Radiol 2008;18:665–71 doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0822-8 pmid:18094974

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Patel MR,
   3. Klufas RA,
   4. Kim D, et al

   . MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1431–37 doi:10.2214/ajr.162.6.8192013 pmid:8192013

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Kaufmann TJ,
   3. Huston J 3rd.,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:912–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1932 pmid:20019107

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Griswold MA,
   3. Jakob PM,
   4. Heidemann RM, et al

   . Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–10 doi:10.1002/mrm.10171 pmid:12111967

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Bhagat YA,
   3. Emery DJ,
   4. Naik S, et al

   . Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:293–98 pmid:17296998

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Preibisch C,
    3. Wallenhorst T,
    4. Heidemann R, et al

    . Comparison of parallel acquisition techniques generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) and modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) in functional MRI (fMRI) at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:590–98 doi:10.1002/jmri.21191 pmid:18219627

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Fushimi Y,
    3. Fujimoto K,
    4. Okada T, et al

    . Compressed sensing 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms: optimization and evaluation. Invest Radiol 2016;51:228–35 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000226 pmid:26606551

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Lustig M,
    3. Donoho D,
    4. Pauly JM

    . Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 pmid:17969013

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Yamamoto T,
    3. Okada T,
    4. Fushimi Y, et al

    . Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: an evaluation of moyamoya disease. PLoS One 2018;13:e0189493 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189493 pmid:29351284

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Stalder AF,
    3. Schmidt M,
    4. Quick HH, et al

    . Highly undersampled contrast-enhanced MRA with iterative reconstruction: integration in a clinical setting. Magn Reson Med 2015;74:1652–60 doi:10.1002/mrm.25565 pmid:25522299

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Akçakaya M,
    3. Rayatzadeh H,
    4. Basha TA, et al

    . Accelerated late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR imaging with isotropic spatial resolution using compressed sensing: initial experience. Radiology 2012;264:691–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.12112489 pmid:22820734

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Chandarana H,
    3. Block TK,
    4. Ream J, et al

    . Estimating liver perfusion from free-breathing continuously acquired dynamic gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced acquisition with compressed sensing reconstruction. Invest Radiol 2015;50:88–94 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000105 pmid:25333309

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Vasanawala SS,
    3. Alley MT,
    4. Hargreaves BA, et al

    . Improved pediatric MR imaging with compressed sensing. Radiology 2010;256:607–16 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091218 pmid:20529991

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Samuels OB,
    3. Joseph GJ,
    4. Lynn MJ, et al

    . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:643–46 pmid:10782772

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Feichtenhofer CF,
    3. Fassold H,
    4. Schallauer P

    . A perceptual image sharpness metric based on local edge gradient analysis. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2013;20:379–82 doi:10.1109/LSP.2013.2248711

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    2. Fujita N,
    3. Hirabuki N,
    4. Fujii K, et al

    . MR imaging of middle cerebral artery stenosis and occlusion: value of MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:335–41 pmid:8192082

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Oelerich M,
    3. Lentschig MG,
    4. Zunker P, et al

    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography. Neuroradiology 1998;40:567–73 doi:10.1007/s002340050645 pmid:9808312

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Konar AS,
    3. Aiholli S,
    4. Shashikala HC, et al

    . Application of region of interest compressed sensing to accelerate magnetic resonance angiography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014;2014:2428–31 doi:10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944112 pmid:25570480

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Rapacchi S,
    3. Han F,
    4. Natsuaki Y, et al

    . High spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing with magnitude image subtraction. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:1771–83 doi:10.1002/mrm.24842 pmid:23801456

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Yamamoto T,
    3. Fujimoto K,
    4. Okada T, et al

    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction: comparison with conventional parallel imaging for accelerated imaging. Invest Radiol 2016;51:372–78 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000221 pmid:26561046

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Hutter J,
    3. Grimm R,
    4. Forman C, et al

    . Highly undersampled peripheral time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: optimized data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction. MAGMA 2015;28:437–46 doi:10.1007/s10334-014-0477-9 pmid:25605300

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Fushimi Y,
    3. Okada T,
    4. Kikuchi T, et al

    . Clinical evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction for cerebral aneurysms. NMR Biomed 2017;30 doi:10.1002/nbm.3774 pmid:28796397

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Anderson CM,
    3. Saloner D,
    4. Tsuruda JS, et al

    . Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:623–29 doi:10.2214/ajr.154.3.2106232 pmid:2106232

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Wilms G,
    3. Bosmans H,
    4. Demaerel P, et al

    . Magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial vessels. Eur J Radiol 2001;38:10–8

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science