Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging and Motor Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Langhorne P,
   3. Coupar F,
   4. Pollock A

   . Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:741–54 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4 pmid:19608100

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Hendricks HT,
   3. van Limbeek J,
   4. Geurts AC, et al

   . Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629–37 doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35473 pmid:12422337

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Duncan PW,
   3. Goldstein LB,
   4. Matchar D, et al

   . Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992;23:1084–89 doi:10.1161/01.STR.23.8.1084 pmid:1636182

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Prabhakaran S,
   3. Zarahn E,
   4. Riley C, et al

   . Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:64–71 pmid:17687024

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Ward NS,
   3. Newton JM,
   4. Swayne OB, et al

   . Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain 2006;129:809–19 doi:10.1093/brain/awl002 pmid:16421171

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Puig J,
   3. Pedraza S,
   4. Blasco G, et al

   . Acute damage to the posterior limb of the internal capsule on diffusion tensor tractography as an early imaging predictor of motor outcome after stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:857–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2400 pmid:21474629

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Kumar P,
   3. Kathuria P,
   4. Nair P, et al

   . Prediction of upper limb motor recovery after subacute ischemic stroke using diffusion tensor imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke 2016;18:50–59 doi:10.5853/jos.2015.01186 pmid:26846758

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Yu C,
   3. Zhu C,
   4. Zhang Y, et al

   . A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study on Wallerian degeneration of corticospinal tract after motor pathway stroke. Neuroimage 2009;47:451–58 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.066 pmid:19409500

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Groisser BN,
   3. Copen WA,
   4. Singhal AB, et al

   . Corticospinal tract diffusion abnormalities early after stroke predict motor outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014;28:751–60 doi:10.1177/1545968314521896 pmid:24519021

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Puig J,
    3. Pedraza S,
    4. Blasco G, et al

    . Wallerian degeneration in the corticospinal tract evaluated by diffusion tensor imaging correlates with motor deficit 30 days after middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1324–30 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2038 pmid:20299434

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Jensen JH,
    3. Helpern JA

    . MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed 2010;23:698–710 doi:10.1002/nbm.1518 pmid:20632416

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Jensen JH,
    3. Helpern JA,
    4. Tabesh A

    . Leading non-Gaussian corrections for diffusion orientation distribution function. NMR Biomed 2014;27:202–11 doi:10.1002/nbm.3053 pmid:24738143

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Grinberg F,
    3. Ciobanu L,
    4. Farrher E, et al

    . Diffusion kurtosis imaging and log-normal distribution function imaging enhance the visualisation of lesions in animal stroke models. NMR Biomed 2012;25:1295–304 doi:10.1002/nbm.2802 pmid:22461260

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Fieremans E,
    3. Jensen JH,
    4. Helpern JA

    . White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage 2011;58:177–88 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006 pmid:21699989

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Fugl-Meyer AR,
    3. Jaasko L,
    4. Leyman I, et al

    . The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13–31 pmid:1135616

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Shelton FN,
    3. Reding MJ

    . Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:107–12 doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.1.107 pmid:11136923

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Tabesh A,
    3. Jensen JH,
    4. Ardekani BA, et al

    . Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magnetic Reson Med 2011;65:823–36 doi:10.1002/mrm.22655 pmid:21337412

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Yeh FC,
    3. Verstynen TD,
    4. Wang Y, et al

    . Deterministic diffusion fiber tracking improved by quantitative anisotropy. PLoS One 2013;8:e80713 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080713 pmid:24348913

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Wakana S,
    3. Caprihan A,
    4. Panzenboeck MM, et al

    . Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. Neuroimage 2007;36:630–44 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.049 pmid:17481925

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Moulton E,
    3. Amor-Sahli M,
    4. Perlbarg V, et al

    . Axial diffusivity of the corona radiata at 24 hours post-stroke: a new biomarker for motor and global outcome. PLoS One 2015;10:e0142910 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142910 pmid:26562509

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Bhagat YA,
    3. Hussain MS,
    4. Stobbe RW, et al

    . Elevations of diffusion anisotropy are associated with hyper-acute stroke: a serial imaging study. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:683–93 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.015 pmid:18440747

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Cheung JS,
    3. Wang E,
    4. Lo EH, et al

    . Stratification of heterogeneous diffusion MRI ischemic lesion with kurtosis imaging: evaluation of mean diffusion and kurtosis MRI mismatch in an animal model of transient focal ischemia. Stroke 2012;43:2252–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661926 pmid:22773558

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Jensen JH,
    3. Falangola MF,
    4. Hu C, et al

    . Preliminary observations of increased diffusional kurtosis in human brain following recent cerebral infarction. NMR Biomed 2011;24:452–57 doi:10.1002/nbm.1610 pmid:20960579

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Hui ES,
    3. Fieremans E,
    4. Jensen JH, et al

    . Stroke assessment with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Stroke 2012;43:2968–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.657742 pmid:22933581

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Budde MD,
    3. Frank JA

    . Neurite beading is sufficient to decrease the apparent diffusion coefficient after ischemic stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:14472–77 doi:10.1073/pnas.1004841107 pmid:20660718

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Weber RA,
    3. Hui ES,
    4. Jensen JH, et al

    . Diffusional kurtosis and diffusion tensor imaging reveal different time-sensitive stroke-induced microstructural changes. Stroke 2015;46:545–50 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006782 pmid:25563646

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Doughty C,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Feng W, et al

    . Detection and predictive value of fractional anisotropy changes of the corticospinal tract in the acute phase of a stroke. Stroke 2016;47:1520–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012088 pmid:27217504

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Puig J,
    3. Blasco G,
    4. Daunis-I-Estadella J, et al

    . Decreased corticospinal tract fractional anisotropy predicts long-term motor outcome after stroke. Stroke 2013;44:2016–18 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000382 pmid:23652266

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Feng W,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Chhatbar PY, et al

    . Corticospinal tract lesion load: an imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes. Ann Neurol 2015;78:860–70 doi:10.1002/ana.24510 pmid:26289123

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Stinear C

    . Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:1228–32 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7 pmid:21035399

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Chen CL,
    3. Tang FT,
    4. Chen HC, et al

    . Brain lesion size and location: effects on motor recovery and functional outcome in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:447–52 doi:10.1053/mr.2000.3837 pmid:10768534

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science