Large Basilar Apex Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Brisman JL,
   3. Song JK,
   4. Newell DW

   . Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006;355:928–39 doi:10.1056/NEJMra052760 pmid:16943405

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Vallee JN,
   3. Aymard A,
   4. Vicaut E, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: predictors of immediate and long-term results with multivariate analysis 6-year experience. Radiology 2003;226:867–79 doi:10.1148/radiol.2263011957 pmid:12601216

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Wong GK,
   3. Kwan MC,
   4. Ng RY, et al

   . Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status and ongoing clinical trials. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:737–40 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.011 pmid:21514166

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Taki W,
   3. Sakai N,
   4. Nakahara I, et al

   . Circulatory arrest with profound hypothermia during the surgical treatment of large internal carotid artery aneurysm–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1998;38:725–29 doi:10.2176/nmc.38.725 pmid:9919904

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Sekhar LN,
   3. Tariq F,
   4. Morton RP, et al

   . Basilar tip aneurysms: a microsurgical and endovascular contemporary series of 100 patients. Neurosurgery 2013;72:284–98; discussion 298–99 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182797952 pmid:23147787

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Jin SC,
   3. Ahn JS,
   4. Kwun BD, et al

   . Analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes in microsurgical and endovascular treatment of basilar apex aneurysms. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;45:224–30 doi:10.3340/jkns.2009.45.4.224 pmid:19444348

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Miranda C,
   4. Ceratto R, et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–43; quiz N6 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65 pmid:19349825

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Lubicz B,
   3. Collignon L,
   4. Raphaeli G, et al

   . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589911 pmid:20798369

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Kelly ME,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . Curative reconstruction of a giant midbasilar trunk aneurysm with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2009;64:212–17; discussion 217 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000337576.98984.E4 pmid:19057425

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Berentei Z,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Kan P,
    3. Duckworth E,
    4. Puri A, et al

    . Treatment failure of fetal posterior communicating artery aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:945–48 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011959 pmid:26363511

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Ernemann U,
    4. Wetzel SG, et al

    . High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010;41:1690–96 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580308 pmid:20616327

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology 2016;58:171–77 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4 pmid:26553302

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Mihalea C,
    4. Neki H, et al

    . Role of C-arm VasoCT in the use of endovascular WEB flow disruption in intracranial aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1353–57 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3860 pmid:24524918

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Mascitelli JR,
    3. Moyle H,
    4. Oermann EK, et al

    . An update to the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:496–502 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011258 pmid:24898735

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Van der Elst O,
    4. Collignon L, et al

    . Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:542–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4143 pmid:25376806

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Wang CB,
    3. Shi WW,
    4. Zhang GX, et al

    . Flow diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2016;58:391–400 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1649-2 pmid:26801480

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Hadley MN,
    4. Rigamonti D, et al

    . Aneurysms of the basilar artery treated with circulatory arrest, hypothermia, and barbiturate cerebral protection. J Neurosurg 1988;68:868–79 doi:10.3171/jns.1988.68.6.0868 pmid:3373282

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Bartolini B,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Pistocchi S, et al

    . “Y” and “X” stent-assisted coiling of complex and wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2153–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4060 pmid:25059700

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Turowski B,
    3. Macht S,
    4. Kulcsár Z, et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0676-7 pmid:20339842

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Velioglu M,
    3. Kizilkilic O,
    4. Selcuk H, et al

    . Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1355–65 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1051-7 pmid:22695740

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Thielen E,
    3. McClure M,
    4. Rouchaud A, et al

    . Concomitant coiling reduces metalloproteinase levels in flow diverter-treated aneurysms but anti-inflammatory treatment has no effect. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:307–10 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012207 pmid:26975840

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Raschi M, et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2398 pmid:21071533

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Natarajan SK,
    3. Lin N,
    4. Sonig A, et al

    . The safety of Pipeline flow diversion in fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms: a consecutive case series with longer-term follow-up from a single US center. J Neurosurg 2016;125:111–19 doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS1565 pmid:26654175

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Marinković SV,
    3. Gibo H

    . The surgical anatomy of the perforating branches of the basilar artery. Neurosurgery 1993;33:80–87 doi:10.1227/00006123-199307000-00012 pmid:8355851

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Marinković S,
    3. Milisavljević M,
    4. Kovacević M

    . Interpeduncular perforating branches of the posterior cerebral artery. Microsurgical anatomy of their extracerebral and intracerebral segments. Surg Neurol 1986;26:349–59 doi:10.1016/0090-3019(86)90135-7 pmid:3529466

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Gascou G,
    3. Lobotesis K,
    4. Brunel H, et al

    . Extra-aneurysmal flow modification following Pipeline embolization device implantation: focus on regional branches, perforators, and the parent vessel. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:725–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4191 pmid:25523592

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Puffer RC,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:892–96 doi:10.3171/2011.11.JNS111612 pmid:22224787

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Alqadri S,
    3. Adil MM,
    4. Watanabe M, et al

    . Patterns of collateral formation in basilar artery steno-occlusive diseases. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2013;6:9–13 pmid:24358410

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Brassier G,
    3. Morandi X,
    4. Fournier D, et al

    . Origin of the perforating arteries of the interpeduncular fossa in relation to the termination of the basilar artery. Interv Neuroradiol 1998;4:109–20 doi:10.1177/159101999800400202 pmid:20673399

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Seong J,
    3. Wakhloo AK,
    4. Lieber BB

    . In vitro evaluation of flow divertors in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:863–72 doi:10.1115/1.2800787 pmid:18067390

    CrossRefPubMed