Flow Diversion in Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Guglielmi G,
   3. Viñuela F,
   4. Dion J, et al

   . Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach, Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 1991;75:8–14 pmid:2045924

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Wiebers DO,
   3. Whisnant JP,
   4. Huston J 3rd.

   , International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Spelle L,
   4. Vitry F, et al

   ; ATENA Investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497–504 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512756 pmid:18617659

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Kerr R,
   4. Stratton I

   ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. McDougall CG,
   3. Spetzler RF,
   4. Zabramski JM, et al

   . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44 doi:10.3171/2011.8.JNS101767 pmid:22054213

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Brilstra EH,
   3. Rinkel GJ,
   4. Algra A, et al

   . Rebleeding, secondary ischemia, and timing of operation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2000;55:1656–60 doi:10.1212/WNL.55.11.1656 pmid:11113219

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Koivisto T,
   3. Vanninen R,
   4. Hurskainen H, et al

   . Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000;31:2369–77 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2369 pmid:11022066

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Yu SC,
   3. Kwok CK,
   4. Cheng PW, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Zhu Y,
   3. Pan J,
   4. Shen J, et al

   . Clinical and radiological outcomes after treatment of unruptured paraophthalmic internal carotid artery aneurysms: a comparative and pooled analysis of single-center experiences. World Neurosurg 2015;84:1726–38 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.036 pmid:26210711

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Petr O,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Cloft H, et al

    . Current trends and results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at a single institution in the flow-diverter era. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1106–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4699 pmid:26797138

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Di Maria F,
    3. Pistocchi S Clarençon F, et al

    . Flow diversion versus standard endovascular techniques for the treatment of unruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2325–30 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4437 pmid:26797138

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Kühn AL,
    3. Hou SY,
    4. Perras M, et al

    . Flow diverter stents for unruptured saccular anterior circulation perforating artery aneurysms: safety, efficacy, and short-term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:634–40 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011237 pmid:25051964

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Tanweer O,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Brunswick A, et al

    . Cavernous carotid aneurysms in the era of flow diversion: a need to revisit treatment paradigms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2334–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4081 pmid:25147199

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Yang S, et al

    . Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 2014;45:54–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003038 pmid:24253543

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Starke RM, et al

    . Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2150–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785 pmid:23723311

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Hsu D,
    4. Woo HH, et al

    . Very late thrombosis of a Pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 2010;67(3 suppl operative):onsE313–14; discussion onsE314 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000383875.08681.23 pmid:20679914

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Saatci I,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Ozer C, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Vajda Z,
    4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x pmid:21881914

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Proust F,
    3. Hannequin D,
    4. Langlois O, et al

    . Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients: the importance of control angiography. Stroke 1995;26:1553–57 doi:10.1161/01.STR.26.9.1553 pmid:7660397

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Riley RD,
    3. Lambert PC,
    4. Abo-Zaid G

    . Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ 2010;340:c221 doi:10.1136/bmj.c221 pmid:20139215

    FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Çinar C,
    3. Oran İ,
    4. Bozkaya H, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms with special reference to the flow-diverting strategy. Neuroradiology 2013;55:441–47 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1136-y pmid:23322455

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. O'Kelly C,
    4. Kelly M, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:271–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3380 pmid:23064594

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. McAuliffe W,
    3. Wenderoth JD

    . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:487–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2797 pmid:22135131

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Lin N,
    3. Brouillard AM,
    4. Keigher KM, et al

    . Utilization of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:808–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011320 pmid:25230839

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Zanaty M,
    4. Whiting A, et al

    . Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2015;76:165–72; discussion 172 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000586 pmid:25549187

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Nerva JD,
    3. Morton RP,
    4. Levitt MR, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device as primary treatment for blister aneurysms and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:210–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011047 pmid:24578484

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Yoon JW,
    3. Siddiqui AH,
    4. Dumont TM, et al

    ; Endovascular Neurosurgery Research Group. Feasibility and safety of Pipeline embolization device in patients with ruptured carotid blister aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2014;75:419–29; discussion 429 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000487 pmid:24991709

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Mahaney KB,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Viljoen S, et al

    . Risk of hemorrhagic complication associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. J Neurosurg 2013;119:937–42 doi:10.3171/2013.5.JNS122494 pmid:23808537

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Brasiliense LB,
    3. Stanley MA,
    4. Grewal SS, et al

    . Silent ischemic events after Pipeline embolization device: a prospective evaluation with MR diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1136–1139 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012091 pmid:26747877

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Chiu AHY,
    3. Wenderoth J

    . Cerebral hyperperfusion after flow diversion of large intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:e48 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010479.rep pmid:23188787

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Velat GJ,
    3. Fargen KM,
    4. Lawson MF, et al

    . Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage following Pipeline embolization device treatment for a giant recanalized ophthalmic aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:e24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010129 pmid:21990545

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Cruz J,
    3. Chow M,
    4. O'Kelly C, et al

    . Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:603–08 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3065 pmid:22403783

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Cebral J,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Raschi M, et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2398 pmid:21071533

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Khurana VG,
    3. Piepgras DG,
    4. Whisnant JP

    . Ruptured giant intracranial aneurysms, Part I: a study of rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1998;88:425–29 doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0425 pmid:9488294

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Park MS,
    3. Kilburg C,
    4. Taussky P, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device with or without adjunctive coil embolization: analysis of complications from the IntrePED Registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1127–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4678 pmid:26767709

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Lin N,
    3. Brouillard AM,
    4. Krishna C, et al

    . Use of coils in conjunction with the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:142–49 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000579 pmid:25255261

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Piano M,
    4. Fang S, et al

    . Treatment of ruptured complex and large/giant ruptured cerebral aneurysms by acute coiling followed by staged flow diversion. J Neurosurg 2016;125:120–27 doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS151038 pmid:26654182

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Siddiqui AH,
    3. Kan P,
    4. Abla AA, et al

    . Complications after treatment with Pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 2012;71:E509–13; discussion E513 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318258e1f8 pmid:22710418

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    2. Schievink WI,
    3. Wijdicks EF,
    4. Piepgras DG, et al

    . The poor prognosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation. J Neurosurg 1995;82:791–95 doi:10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0791 pmid:7714604

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text