Endovascular Coiling of Wide-Neck and Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Moret J,
   3. Cognard C,
   4. Weill A, et al

   . The “remodelling technique” in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms: angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol 1997;3:21–35 pmid:20678369

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Nakahara T,
   3. Hidaka T,
   4. Kutsuna M, et al

   . Intraaneurysmal embolization for wide-necked aneurysms: remodeling technique, combined neck-clipping and coiling therapy, scaffolding technique. Interv Neuroradiol 2000;6(suppl 1):95–101 pmid:20667229

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Biondi A,
   3. Janardhan V,
   4. Katz JM, et al

   . Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007;61:460–68; discussion 468–69 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000290890.62201.A9 pmid:17881956

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Mu SQ,
   3. Yang XJ,
   4. Li YX, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using of “remodeling technique” with the HyperForm balloon. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:725–29 pmid:18701027

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Lee JY,
   3. Seo JH,
   4. Cho YD, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms using a microcatheter protective technique: results and outcomes in 75 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:917–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2411 pmid:21393400

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Bartolini B,
   3. Blanc R,
   4. Pistocchi S, et al

   . “Y” and “X” stent-assisted coiling of complex and wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2153–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4060 pmid:25059700

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Zhang JZ,
   3. Yang PF,
   4. Huang QH, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling strategies for the treatment of wide-necked basilar artery bifurcation aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:962–67 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.08.025 pmid:24411133

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Ko JK,
   3. Han IH,
   4. Cho WH, et al

   . Crossing Y-stent technique with dual open-cell stents for coiling of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015;132:54–60 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.02.002 pmid:25777137

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. DerSimonian R,
   3. Laird N

   . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88 doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 pmid:3802833

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Higgins JP,
    3. Thompson SG,
    4. Deeks JJ, et al

    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 pmid:12958120

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. McLaughlin N,
    3. McArthur DL,
    4. Martin NA

    . Use of stent-assisted coil embolization for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms: a systematic review. Surg Neurol Int 2013;4:43 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.109810 pmid:23607065

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. McDonald JS,
    3. Norgan AP,
    4. McDonald RJ, et al

    . In-hospital outcomes associated with stent-assisted endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the USA. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:317–20 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010349 pmid:22561915

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Poncyljusz W,
    3. Biliński P,
    4. Safranow K, et al

    . The LVIS/LVIS Jr. stents in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: multicentre registry. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:524–29 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011229 pmid:24827067

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Becske T

    . 5 year follow up results from the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms trial. Stroke 2015:LB P1
16. 16.↵
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Neki H,
    4. Mihalea C, et al

    . Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:279–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4540 pmid:26405085

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Gawlitza M,
    3. Januel AC,
    4. Tall P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:481–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011682 pmid:25878068

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Liebig T,
    4. Sychra V, et al

    . Intrasaccular flow-disruption treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1232–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3191 pmid:22678844

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Behme D,
    3. Berlis A,
    4. Weber W

    . Woven EndoBridge intrasaccular flow disrupter for the treatment of ruptured and unruptured wide-neck cerebral aneurysms: report of 55 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1501–06 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4323 pmid:25953761

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Klisch J,
    4. Gauvrit JY, et al

    . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:432–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3869 pmid:24457823

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Costalat V,
    4. Moret J, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1250–56 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634 pmid:26381253

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Balshem H,
    3. Helfand M,
    4. Schünemann HJ, et al

    . GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:401–06 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 pmid:21208779

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Guyatt GH,
    3. Oxman AD,
    4. Kunz R, et al

    . GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1283–93 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012 pmid:21839614

    CrossRefPubMed