Relationship between M100 Auditory Evoked Response and Auditory Radiation Microstructure in 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Carriers

References

1. 1.↵
   The Simons VIP Consortium. Simons Variation in Individuals Project (Simons VIP): a genetics-first approach to studying autism spectrum and related neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuron 2012;73:1063–67 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.014 pmid:22445335

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Weiss LA,
   3. Shen Y,
   4. Korn JM, et al

   . Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med 2008;358:667–75 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa075974 pmid:18184952

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Bochukova EG,
   3. Huang N,
   4. Keogh J, et al

   . Large, rare chromosomal deletions associated with severe early-onset obesity. Nature 2010;463:666–70 doi:10.1038/nature08689 pmid:19966786

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Jacquemont S,
   3. Reymond A,
   4. Zufferey F, et al

   . Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature 2011;478:97–102 doi:10.1038/nature10406 pmid:21881559

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Fernandez BA,
   3. Roberts W,
   4. Chung B, et al

   . Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Med Genet 2010;47:195–203 doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.069369 pmid:19755429

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Rosenfeld JA,
   3. Coppinger J,
   4. Bejjani BA, et al

   . Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. J Neurodev Disord 2010;2:26–38 doi:10.1007/s11689-009-9037-4 pmid:21731881

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Hanson E,
   3. Bernier R,
   4. Porche K, et al

   ; Simons Variation in Individuals Project Consortium. The cognitive and behavioral phenotype of the 16p11.2 deletion in a clinically ascertained population. Biol Psychiatry 2015;77:785–93 doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.021 pmid:25064419

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Zufferey F,
   3. Sherr EH,
   4. Beckmann ND, et al

   ; Simons VIP Consortium, 16p11.2 European Consortium. A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. J Med Genet 2012;49:660–68 doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101203 pmid:23054248

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Hanson E,
   3. Nasir RH,
   4. Fong A, et al

   ; 16p11.2 Study Group Clinicians. Cognitive and behavioral characterization of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2010;31:649–57 doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181ea50ed pmid:20613623

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Qureshi AY,
    3. Mueller S,
    4. Snyder AZ, et al

    ; Simons VIP Consortium. Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci 2014;34:11199–211 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1366-14.2014 pmid:25143601

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Owen JP,
    3. Chang YS,
    4. Pojman NJ, et al

    ; Simons VIP Consortium. Aberrant white matter microstructure in children with 16p11.2 deletions. J Neurosci 2014;34:6214–23 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4495-13.2014 pmid:24790192

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Berman JI,
    3. Chudnovskaya D,
    4. Blaskey L, et al

    . Abnormal auditory and language pathways in children with 16p11.2 deletion. Neuroimage Clin 2015;9:50–57 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.07.006 pmid:26413471

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Jenkins J,
    3. Chow V,
    4. Blaskey L, et al

    . Auditory evoked M100 response latency is delayed in children with 16p11.2 deletion but not 16p11.2 duplication. Cereb Cortex 2015 Feb 11. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv008 pmid:25678630

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Roberts TP,
    3. Lanza MR,
    4. Dell J, et al

    . Maturational differences in thalamocortical white matter microstructure and auditory evoked response latencies in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res 2013;1537:79–85 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.011 pmid:24055954

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Lange N,
    3. DuBray MB,
    4. Lee JE, et al

    . Atypical diffusion tensor hemispheric asymmetry in autism. Autism Res 2010;3:350–58 doi:10.1002/aur.162 pmid:21182212

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Berman J,
    3. Lanza M,
    4. Blaskey L, et al

    . High angular resolution diffusion imaging probabilistic tractography of the auditory radiation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1573–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3471 pmid:23493892

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Semel EM,
    3. Wiig EH,
    4. Secord W

    . Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-4). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 2003
18. 18.↵
    2. Elliott CD

    . Differential Ability Scales. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Pearson; 2007
19. 19.↵
    2. Lord C,
    3. Risi S,
    4. Lambrecht L, et al

    . The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2000;30:205–23 doi:10.1023/A:1005592401947 pmid:11055457

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Rutter M,
    3. Bailey A,
    4. Lord C

    . Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 2003
21. 21.↵
    2. Owen JP,
    3. Ziv E,
    4. Bukshpun P, et al

    . Test-retest reliability of computational network measurements derived from the structural connectome of the human brain. Brain Connect 2013;3:160–76 doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0121 pmid:23350832

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. van der Kouwe AJ,
    3. Benner T,
    4. Salat DH, et al

    . Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE. Neuroimage 2008;40:559–69 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.025 pmid:18242102

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Berman JI,
    3. Chung S,
    4. Mukherjee P, et al

    . Probabilistic streamline q-ball tractography using the residual bootstrap. Neuroimage 2008;39:215–22 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.021 pmid:17911030

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Fischl B,
    3. Sereno MI,
    4. Tootell RB, et al

    . High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 1999;8:272–84 pmid:10619420

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Roberts TP,
    3. Ferrari P,
    4. Stufflebeam SM, et al

    . Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. J Clin Neurophysiol 2000;17:114–29 doi:10.1097/00004691-200003000-00002 pmid:10831104

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Taschenberger H,
    3. von Gersdorff H

    . Fine-tuning an auditory synapse for speed and fidelity: developmental changes in presynaptic waveform, EPSC kinetics, and synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci 2000;20:9162–73 pmid:11124994

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Gaetz W,
    3. Bloy L,
    4. Wang DJ, et al

    . GABA estimation in the brains of children on the autism spectrum: measurement precision and regional cortical variation. Neuroimage 2014;86:1–9 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.068 pmid:23707581

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Canolty RT,
    3. Knight RT

    . The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci 2010;14:506–15 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.001 pmid:20932795

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Aggarwal M,
    3. Nauen DW,
    4. Troncoso JC, et al

    . Probing region-specific microstructure of human cortical areas using high angular and spatial resolution diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2015;105:198–207 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.053 pmid:25449747

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Roberts TP,
    3. Khan SY,
    4. Blaskey L, et al

    . Developmental correlation of diffusion anisotropy with auditory-evoked response. Neuroreport 2009;20:1586–91 doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283306854 pmid:19898261

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science