3D T2 MR Imaging–Based Measurements of the Posterior Cervical Thecal Sac in Flexion and Extension for Cervical Puncture

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Yousem DM,
   3. Gujar SK

   . Are C1–2 punctures for routine cervical myelography below the standard of care? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1360–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1594 pmid:19369600

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Robertson HJ,
   3. Smith RD

   . Cervical myelography: survey of modes of practice and major complications. Radiology 1990;174:79–83 doi:10.1148/radiology.174.1.2294575 pmid:2294575

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Orrison WW,
   3. Eldevik OP,
   4. Sackett JF

   . Lateral C1–2 puncture for cervical myelography, part III: historical, anatomic, and technical considerations. Radiology 1983;146:401–08 doi:10.1148/radiology.146.2.6687370 pmid:6687370

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   ACR-ASNR-SPR practice parameter for the performance of myelography and cisternography. Updated 2014. http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Myelography.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2015.
5. 5.↵
   2. Muhle C,
   3. Wiskirchen J,
   4. Weinert D, et al

   . Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:556–67 doi:10.1097/00007632-199803010-00008 pmid:9530787

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Muhle C,
   3. Metzner J,
   4. Weinert D, et al

   . Classification system based on kinematic MR imaging in cervical spondylitic myelopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1763–71 pmid:9802503

   Abstract
7. 7.↵
   2. Bartlett RJ,
   3. Hill CA,
   4. Rigby AS, et al

   . MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension:is it useful? Br J Radiol 2012;85:1044–51 doi:10.1259/bjr/94315429 pmid:22215879

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Orrison WW,
   3. Sackett JF,
   4. Amundsen P

   . Lateral C1–2 puncture for cervical myelography, part II: recognition of improper injection of contrast material. Radiology 1983;146:395–400 doi:10.1148/radiology.146.2.6687369 pmid:6687369

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Ulbrich EJ,
   3. Schraner C,
   4. Boesch C, et al

   . Normative MR cervical spinal canal dimensions. Radiology 2014;271:172–82 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120370 pmid:24475792

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Chin KR,
    3. Eiszner JR,
    4. Huang JL, et al

    . Myelographic evaluation of cervical spondylosis: patient tolerance and complications. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:334–37 doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181506780 pmid:18600143

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Johansen JG,
    3. Orrison WW,
    4. Amundsen P

    . Lateral ral C1–2 puncture for cervical myelography, part I: report of a complication. Radiology 1983;146:391–93 doi:10.1148/radiology.146.2.6687368 pmid:6687368

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Nakstad PH,
    3. Kjartansson O

    . Accidental spinal cord injection of contrast material during cervical myelography with lateral C1–C2 puncture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;9:410 pmid:3128095

    FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Servo A,
    3. Laasonen EM

    . Accidental introduction of contrast medium into the cervical spinal cord: a case report. Neuroradiology 1985;27:80–82 doi:10.1007/BF00342522 pmid:3974870

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Rogers LA

    . Acute subdural hematoma and death following lateral cervical spinal puncture: case report. J Neurosurg 1983;58:284–86 doi:10.3171/jns.1983.58.2.0284 pmid:6848691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Abla AA,
    3. Rothfus WE,
    4. Maroon JC, et al

    . Delayed spinal subarachnoid hematoma: a rare complication of C1–C2 cervical myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:526–28 pmid:3085460

    FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Mapstone TB,
    3. Rekate HL,
    4. Shurin SB

    . Quadriplegia secondary to hematoma after lateral C-1, C-2 puncture in a leukemic child. Neurosurgery 1983;12:230–31 doi:10.1227/00006123-198302000-00020 pmid:6572801

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Lighvani AA,
    3. Melhem ER

    . Advances in high-field MR imaging of the spine. Appl Radiol 2009;38:18–27
18. 18.↵
    2. Meindl T,
    3. Wirth S,
    4. Weckbach S, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences. Eur Radiol 2009;19:713–21 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1175-7 pmid:18813933

    CrossRefPubMed