Improving the Grading Accuracy of Astrocytic Neoplasms Noninvasively by Combining Timing Information with Cerebral Blood Flow: A Multi-TI Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Surawicz TS,
   3. McCarthy BJ,
   4. Kupelian V, et al

   . Descriptive epidemiology of primary brain and CNS tumors: results from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 1990–1994. Neuro Oncol 1999;1:14–25 doi:10.1093/neuonc/1.1.14 pmid:11554386

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Suchorska B,
   3. Tonn JC,
   4. Jansen NL

   . PET imaging for brain tumor diagnostics. Curr Opin Neurol 2014;27:683–88 doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000143 pmid:25333605

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Fudaba H,
   3. Shimomura T,
   4. Abe T, et al

   . Comparison of multiple parameters obtained on 3T pulsed arterial spin-labeling, diffusion tensor imaging, and MRS and the Ki-67 labeling index in evaluating glioma grading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2091–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4018 pmid:24994829

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Puttick S,
   3. Bell C,
   4. Dowson N, et al

   . PET, MRI, and simultaneous PET/MRI in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for glioma. Drug Discov Today 2015;20:306–17 doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.016 pmid:25448762

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Shin JH,
   3. Lee HK,
   4. Kwun BD, et al

   . Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:783–89 doi:10.2214/ajr.179.3.1790783 pmid:12185064

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Järnum H,
   3. Steffensen EG,
   4. Knutsson L, et al

   . Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010;52:307–17 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0616-6 pmid:19841916

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Warmuth C,
   3. Gunther M,
   4. Zimmer C

   . Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;228:523–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.2282020409 pmid:12819338

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Chen Y,
   3. Wang DJ,
   4. Detre JA

   . Test-retest reliability of arterial spin labeling with common labeling strategies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:940–49 doi:10.1002/jmri.22345 pmid:21448961

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Wang DJ,
   3. Alger JR,
   4. Qiao JX, et al

   . Multi-delay multi-parametric arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in acute ischemic stroke: comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced perfusion imaging. Neuroimage Clin 2013;3:1–7 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.06.017 pmid:24159561

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Cebeci H,
    3. Aydin O,
    4. Ozturk-Isik E, et al

    . Assessment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1914–19 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.002 pmid:25087109

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Buxton RB,
    3. Frank LR,
    4. Wong EC, et al

    . A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:383–96 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400308 pmid:9727941

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Martin SZ,
    3. Madai VI,
    4. von Samson-Himmelstjerna FC, et al

    . 3D GRASE pulsed arterial spin labeling at multiple inflow times in patients with long arterial transit times: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI at 3 Tesla. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2015;35:392–401 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.200 pmid:25407272

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Ozsunar Y,
    4. Henson JW, et al

    . Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:214–21 pmid:14970020

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Louis DN,
    3. Ohgaki H,
    4. Wiestler OD, et al

    . The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114:97–109 doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 pmid:17618441

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Deibler AR,
    3. Pollock JM,
    4. Kraft RA, et al

    . Arterial spin-labeling in routine clinical practice, part 1: technique and artifacts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1228–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1030 pmid:18372417

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Günther M,
    3. Oshio K,
    4. Feinberg DA

    . Single-shot 3D imaging techniques improve arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:491–98 doi:10.1002/mrm.20580 pmid:16032686

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kim SG

    . Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:293–301 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340303 pmid:7500865

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Pierallini ,
    3. Bonamini M.,
    4. Bozzao A., et al

    . Supratentorial diffuse astrocytic tumors: proposal of an MRI classification. Eur Radiol 1997;7:395–99 doi:10.1007/s003300050173 pmid:9087364

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Riemann B,
    3. Papke K,
    4. Hoess N, et al

    . Noninvasive grading of untreated gliomas: a comparative study of MR imaging and 3-(iodine 123)-L-alpha-methyltyrosine SPECT. Radiology 2002;225:567–74 doi:10.1148/radiol.2252011431 pmid:12409596

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Sahin N,
    3. Melhem ER,
    4. Wang S, et al

    . Advanced MR imaging techniques in the evaluation of nonenhancing gliomas: perfusion-weighted imaging compared with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and tumor grade. Neuroradiol J 2013;26:531–41 doi:10.1177/197140091302600506 pmid:24199813

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Hirai T,
    3. Kitajima M,
    4. Nakamura H, et al

    . Quantitative blood flow measurements in gliomas using arterial spin-labeling at 3T: intermodality agreement and inter- and intraobserver reproducibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2073–79 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2725 pmid:21960503

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Furtner J,
    3. Schöpf V,
    4. Schewzow K, et al

    . Arterial spin-labeling assessment of normalized vascular intratumoral signal intensity as a predictor of histologic grade of astrocytic neoplasms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:482–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3705 pmid:23945226

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. DeLong ER,
    3. DeLong DM,
    4. Clarke-Pearson DL

    . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45 doi:10.2307/2531595 pmid:3203132

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Wolf RL,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Wang S, et al

    . Grading of CNS neoplasms using continuous arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:475–82 doi:10.1002/jmri.20415 pmid:16161080

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Noguchi T,
    3. Yoshiura T,
    4. Hiwatashi A, et al

    . Arterial spin-labeling magnetic resonance imaging: the timing of regional maximal perfusion-related signal intensity revealed by a multiphase technique. Jpn J Radiol 2012;30:137–45 doi:10.1007/s11604-011-0025-8 pmid:22173560

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Hales PW,
    3. Phipps KP,
    4. Kaur R, et al

    . A two-stage model for in vivo assessment of brain tumor perfusion and abnormal vascular structure using arterial spin labeling. PLoS One 2013;8:e75717 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075717 pmid:24098395

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Folkerth RD

    . Descriptive analysis and quantification of angiogenesis in human brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2000;50:165–72 doi:10.1023/A:1006499824379 pmid:11245275

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Vidyasagar R,
    3. Abernethy L,
    4. Pizer B, et al

    . Quantitative measurement of blood flow in paediatric brain tumours: a comparative study of dynamic susceptibility contrast and multi time-point arterial spin labelled MRI. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150624 doi:10.1259/bjr.20150624 pmid:26975495

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Detre JA,
    4. Golay X, et al

    . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16 doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426

    CrossRefPubMed