Neuroimaging Wisely

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bhargavan M,
   3. Sunshine JH

   . Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology 2005;234:824–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.2343031536 pmid:15681686

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Iglehart JK

   . Health insurers and medical-imaging policy: a work in progress. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1030–37 doi:10.1056/NEJMhpr0808703 pmid:19264694

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   American Health Insurance Plans. Ensuring Quality through Appropriate Use of Diagnostic Imaging. July 2008. http://ahipcoverage.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/QualityAppropriateImaging.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2015.
4. 4.↵
   2. Mitchell JM,
   3. Lagalia RR

   . Controlling the escalating use of advanced imaging: the role of radiology benefit management programs. Med Care Res 2009;66:339–51 doi:10.1177/1077558709332055 pmid:19208823

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Cassel CK,
   3. Guest JA

   . Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA 2012;307:1801–02 doi:10.1001/jama.2012.476 pmid:22492759

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Rao VM,
   3. Levin DC

   . The overuse of diagnostic imaging and the Choosing Wisely initiative. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:574–76 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-8-201210160-00535 pmid:22928172

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Rao VM,
   3. Levin DC

   . The Choosing Wisely initiative of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation: what will its impact be on radiology practice? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:358–61 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11123 pmid:24450677

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Morden NE,
   3. Colla CH,
   4. Sequist TD, et al

   . Choosing wisely–the politics and economics of labeling low-value services. N Engl J Med 2014;370:589–92 doi:10.1056/NEJMp1314965 pmid:24450859

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Weiss AJ,
   3. Wier LM,
   4. Stocks C, et al

   . Overview of emergency department visits in the United States, 2011. HCUP Statistical Brief #174 [Internet]. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; June 2014. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb174-Emergency-Department-Visits-Overview.pdf. pmid:25144109
10. 10.↵
    2. St Sauver JL,
    3. Warner DO,
    4. Yawn BP, et al

    . Why patients visit their doctors: assessing the most prevalent conditions in a defined American population. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:56–67 doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.08.020 pmid:23274019

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Ellenbogen PH

    . Imaging 3.0: what is it? J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10:229 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.02.011 pmid:23545079

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Medina LS,
    3. Sanelli PC,
    4. Jarvik JG

    . Evidence-Based Neuroimaging Diagnosis and Treatment: Improving the Quality of Neuroimaging in Patient Care. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013
13. 13.↵
    2. Rutland-Brown W,
    3. Langlois JA,
    4. Thomas KE, et al

    . Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006;21:544–48 doi:10.1097/00001199-200611000-00009 pmid:17122685

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Kay T

    . Neuropsychological treatment of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:74–85

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    Report to Congress on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Steps to Prevent a Serious Public Health Problem. 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/mtbireport-a.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2015.
16. 16.↵
    2. Jagoda AS,
    3. Bazarian JJ,
    4. Bruns JJ, et al

    ; American College of Emergency Physicians, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann Emerg Med 2008;52:714–48 doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.021 pmid:19027497

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Davis PC,
    3. Drayer BP,
    4. Anderson RE, et al

    . Head trauma: American College of Radiology—ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000;215(suppl):507–24 pmid:11037462

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Sanelli PC,
    4. Anzai Y, et al

    ; American College of Radiology Head Injury Institute. Imaging evidence and recommendations for traumatic brain injury: advanced neuro- and neurovascular imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:E1–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4181 pmid:25424870

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Sanelli PC,
    4. Anzai Y, et al

    . Imaging evidence and recommendations for traumatic brain injury: conventional neuroimaging techniques. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:e1–14 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.014 pmid:25456317

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Gaini SM,
    3. Fiori L,
    4. Cesana C, et al

    . The headache in the emergency department. Neurol Sci 2004;25(suppl 3):S196–201 doi:10.1007/s10072-004-0285-5 pmid:15549536

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Morey SS

    . Headache Consortium releases guidelines for use of CT or MRI in migraine work-up. Am Fam Physician 2000;62:1699–701 pmid:11037079

    PubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Silberstein SD

    . Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2000;55:754–62 doi:10.1212/WNL.55.6.754 pmid:10993991

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Douglas AC,
    3. Wippold FJ 2nd.,
    4. Broderick DF, et al

    . ACR Appropriateness Criteria Headache. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:657–67 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.024 pmid:24933450

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Deyo RA,
    3. Phillips WR

    . Low back pain: a primary care challenge. Spine 1996;21:2826–32 doi:10.1097/00007632-199612150-00003 pmid:9112706

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Chou R,
    3. Fu R,
    4. Carrino JA, et al

    . Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373:463–72 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60172-0 pmid:19200918

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Chou R,
    3. Qaseem A,
    4. Owens DK, et al

    ; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:181–89 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00008 pmid:21282698

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Kochen MM,
    3. Blozik E,
    4. Scherer M, et al

    . Imaging for low-back pain. Lancet 2009;373:436–37 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60149-5 pmid:19200903

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Davis PC,
    3. Wippold FJ 2nd.,
    4. Brunberg JA, et al

    . ACR Appropriateness Criteria on low back pain. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:401–07 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2009.02.008 pmid:19467485

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Moya A,
    3. Sutton R,
    4. Ammirati F, et al

    ; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope; European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); Heart Failure Association (HFA); Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J 2009;30:2631–71 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp298 pmid:19713422

    FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Neeman N,
    3. Quinn K,
    4. Soni K, et al

    . Reducing radiology use on an inpatient medical service: choosing wisely. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1606–08 doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4293 pmid:22928182

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Gauer RL

    . Evaluation of syncope. Am Fam Physician 2011;84:640–50 pmid:21916389

    PubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Cruickshanks KJ,
    3. Wiley TL,
    4. Tweed TS, et al

    . Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:879–86 doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009713 pmid:9801018

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Congdon N,
    3. O'Colmain B,
    4. Klaver CC, et al

    ; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 1960 2004;122:477–85 pmid:15078664

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Feder RS,
    3. Olsen TW,
    4. Prum BE Jr., et al

    . Comprehensive Adult Medical Eye Evaluation Preferred Practice Pattern(®) Guidelines. Ophthalmology 2016;123:P209–36 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.047 pmid:26581558

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Pelletier AL,
    3. Thomas J,
    4. Shaw FR

    . Vision loss in older persons. Am Fam Physician 2009;79:963–70 pmid:19514694

    PubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Hasso AN,
    3. Drayer BP,
    4. Anderson RE, et al

    . Orbits, vision, and visual loss. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000;215(suppl):579–87 pmid:11037468

    PubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Stachler RJ,
    3. Chandrasekhar SS,
    4. Archer SM, et al

    ; American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Clinical practice guideline: sudden hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146(3 suppl):S1–35 doi:10.1177/0194599812436449 pmid:22383545

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Schappert SM,
    3. Burt CW

    . Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 2001–02. Vital Health Stat 13 2006:1–66 pmid:16471269

    PubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Chow AW,
    3. Benninger MS,
    4. Brook I, et al

    ; Infectious Diseases Society of America. IDSA clinical practice guideline for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in children and adults. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:e72–112 doi:10.1093/cid/cis370 pmid:22438350

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    2. Rosenfeld RM,
    3. Piccirillo JF,
    4. Chandrasekhar SS, et al

    . Clinical practice guideline (update): adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;152:S1–39 doi:10.1177/0194599814561600 pmid:25832968

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Huntzinger A

    . Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of rhinosinusitis in adults. Am Fam Physician 2007;76:1718–24
42. 42.↵
    2. Cornelius RS,
    3. Martin J,
    4. Wippold FJ, et al

    ; American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria sinonasal disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10:241–46 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.01.001 pmid:23420025

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Schwartz SR,
    3. Cohen SM,
    4. Dailey SH, et al

    . Clinical practice guideline: hoarseness (dysphonia). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141:S1–31 doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.06.744 pmid:19729111

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    2. Schneier AJ,
    3. Shields BJ,
    4. Hostetler SG, et al

    . Incidence of pediatric traumatic brain injury and associated hospital resource utilization in the United States. Pediatrics 2006;118:483–92 doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2588 pmid:16882799

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    2. Kuppermann N,
    3. Holmes JF,
    4. Dayan PS, et al

    ; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009;374:1160–70 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0 pmid:19758692

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    2. Dunning J,
    3. Daly JP,
    4. Lomas JP, et al

    ; Children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events study group. Derivation of the children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:885–91 doi:10.1136/adc.2005.083980 pmid:17056862

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    2. Osmond MH,
    3. Klassen TP,
    4. Wells GA, et al

    ; Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) Head Injury Study Group. CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury. CMAJ 2010;182:341–48 doi:10.1503/cmaj.091421 pmid:20142371

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    2. Ryan ME,
    3. Palasis S,
    4. Saigal G, et al

    . ACR Appropriateness Criteria head trauma–child. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:939–47 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017 pmid:25164794

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Sharp HJ,
    3. Denman D,
    4. Puumala S, et al

    . Treatment of acute and chronic rhinosinusitis in the United States, 1999–2002. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:260–65 doi:10.1001/archotol.133.3.260 pmid:17372083

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    2. Wald ER,
    3. Applegate KE,
    4. Bordley C, et al

    ; American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of acute bacterial sinusitis in children aged 1 to 18 years. Pediatrics 2013;132:e262–80 doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1071 pmid:23796742

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. 51.↵
    2. McAlister WH,
    3. Parker BR,
    4. Kushner DC, et al

    . Sinusitis in the pediatric population. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000;215(suppl):811–18 pmid:11037504

    PubMed
52. 52.↵
    2. Waruiru C,
    3. Appleton R

    . Febrile seizures: an update. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:751–56 doi:10.1136/adc.2003.028449 pmid:15269077

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. 53.↵
    Subcommittee on Febrile Seizures, American Academy of Pediatrics. Neurodiagnostic evaluation of the child with a simple febrile seizure. Pediatrics 2011;127:389–94 doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3318 pmid:21285335

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    2. Strain JD,
    3. Kushner DC,
    4. Babcock DS, et al

    . Imaging of the pediatric patient with seizures. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000;215(suppl):787–800 pmid:11037501

    PubMed
55. 55.↵
    2. Hesdorffer DC,
    3. Chan S,
    4. Tian H, et al

    . Are MRI-detected brain abnormalities associated with febrile seizure type? Epilepsia 2008;49:765–71 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01459.x pmid:18070090

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. 56.↵
    2. DiMario FJ

    . Children presenting with complex febrile seizures do not routinely need computed tomography scanning in the emergency department. Pediatrics 2006;117:528–30 doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2012 pmid:16452375

    FREE Full Text
57. 57.↵
    2. Freidson E

    . Prepaid group practice and the new “demanding patient.” Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1973;51:473–88 doi:10.2307/3349630 pmid:4131740

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. 58.↵
    2. Landon BE,
    3. Wilson IB,
    4. Cleary PD

    . A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care. JAMA 1998;279:1377–82 doi:10.1001/jama.279.17.1377 pmid:9582046

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
59. 59.↵
    2. Studdert DM,
    3. Mello MM,
    4. Sage WM, et al

    . Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 2005;293:2609–17 doi:10.1001/jama.293.21.2609 pmid:15928282

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. 60.↵
    2. Waxman DA,
    3. Ridgely MS,
    4. Heaton P

    . The effect of malpractice reform on emergency department care. N Engl J Med 2015;372:192 doi:10.1056/NEJMc1413881 pmid:25564910

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    2. Prabhakar AM,
    3. Harvey HB,
    4. Misono AS, et al

    . Imaging decision support does not drive out-of-network leakage of referred imaging. J Am Coll Radiol Feb 19. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.004 pmid:26908201

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    2. Taragin BH,
    3. Feng L,
    4. Ruzal-Shapiro C

    . Online radiology appropriateness survey: results and conclusions from an academic internal medicine residency. Acad Radiol 2003;10:781–85 doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80123-X pmid:12862287

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    2. Dym RJ,
    3. Burns J,
    4. Taragin BH

    . Appropriateness of imaging studies ordered by emergency medicine residents: results of an online survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W619–25 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10487 pmid:24059401

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    2. Bautista AB,
    3. Burgos A,
    4. Nickel BJ, et al

    ; American College of Radiology Appropriateness. Do clinicians use the American College of Radiology Appropriateness criteria in the management of their patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1581–85 doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1622 pmid:19457821

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
65. 65.↵
    2. Chiunda AB,
    3. Mohammed TL

    . Knowledge of ACR thoracic imaging Appropriateness Criteria® among trainees: one institution's experience. Acad Radiol 2012;19:635–39 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2012.01.003 pmid:22342651

    CrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    2. Powell DK,
    3. Silberzweig JE

    . The use of ACR Appropriateness Criteria: a survey of radiology residents and program directors. Clin Imaging 2015;39:334–38 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.10.011 pmid:25457568

    CrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    2. Ip IK,
    3. Schneider L,
    4. Seltzer S, et al

    . Impact of provider-led, technology-enabled radiology management program on imaging. Am J Med 2013;126:687–92 doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.034 pmid:23786668

    CrossRefPubMed
68. 68.↵
    2. Dunne RM,
    3. Ip IK,
    4. Abbett S, et al

    . Effect of evidence-based clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiographic imaging in hospitalized patients. Radiology 2015;276:167–74 doi:10.1148/radiol.15141208 pmid:25686367

    CrossRefPubMed
69. 69.↵
    Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014. Pub L No. 113–93, §218, 128 Stat 1040
70. 70.↵
    2. Timbie JW,
    3. Hussey PS,
    4. Burgette LF, et al

    . Medicare Imaging Demonstration Final Evaluation. 2014. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR706.html. Accessed August 10, 2015.
71. 71.↵
    2. Gunn AJ,
    3. Alabre CI,
    4. Bennett SE, et al

    . Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:853–57 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10450 pmid:24059375

    CrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    2. Teske K

    . Three ways radiology groups can be more proactive about utilization management. The Advisory Board Company. September 24, 2014. https://www.advisory.com/research/imaging-performance-partnership/the-reading-room/2014/09/three-ways-radiology-groups-can-be-more-proactive-about-utilization-management. Accessed August 10, 2015.
73. 73.↵
    Choosing Wisely. An initiative of the ABIM Foundation. Choosing Wisely Prompts Kaiser Permanente Branch to Action. February 6, 2014. http://www.choosingwisely.org/resources/updates-from-the-field/choosing-wisely-prompts-kaiser-permanente-branch-to-action/. Accessed March 7, 2016.
74. 74.↵
    2. Curry HA,
    3. Palladino ML,
    4. Jagsi R

    . Utilization of hypofractionated regimens for treatment of breast cancer in an insured population before and after initiation of ASTRO's “Choosing Wisely” campaign. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90:S62 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.212

    CrossRef
75. 75.↵
    2. Mainiero MB

    . Incorporating ACR Practice Guidelines, technical standards, and appropriateness criteria into resident education. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:277–79 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2004.01.009 pmid:17411580

    CrossRefPubMed
76. 76.↵
    2. Lin FY,
    3. Dunning AM,
    4. Narula J, et al

    . Impact of an automated multimodality point-of-order decision support tool on rates of appropriate testing and clinical decision making for individuals with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:308–16 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.059 pmid:23707319

    FREE Full Text
77. 77.↵
    2. Sistrom CL,
    3. Dang PA,
    4. Weilburg JB, et al

    . Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology 2009;251:147–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.2511081174 pmid:19221058

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
78. 78.↵
    2. Blackmore CC,
    3. Medina LS

    . Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. J Am Coll Radiol 2006;3:505–09 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.003 pmid:17412113

    CrossRefPubMed
79. 79.
    2. Smits M,
    3. Dippel DWJ,
    4. de Haan GG, et al

    . External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294:1519–25 doi:10.1001/jama.294.12.1519 pmid:16189365

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
80. 80.
    2. Quinn JV,
    3. Stiell IG,
    4. McDermott DA, et al

    . Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:224–32 doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00823-0 pmid:14747812

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science