HydroCoils Are Associated with Lower Angiographic Recurrence Rates Than Are Bare Platinum Coils in Treatment of “Difficult-to-Treat” Aneurysms: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the HELPS Trial

References

1. 1.↵
   2. White PM,
   3. Lewis SC,
   4. Gholkar A, et al

   ; HELPS trial collaborators. Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60408-X pmid:21571149

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Fujiwara NH

   . New expandable hydrogel-platinum coil hybrid device for aneurysm embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1580–88 pmid:12372752

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Watanabe K,
   3. Sugiu K,
   4. Tokunaga K, et al

   . Packing efficacy of HydroCoil embolic system: in vitro study using ruptured aneurysm model. Neurosurg Rev 2007;30:127–30; discussion 130 doi:10.1007/s10143-007-0066-8 pmid:17323099

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Ding YH,
   3. Dai D,
   4. Lewis DA, et al

   . Angiographic and histologic analysis of experimental aneurysms embolized with platinum coils, Matrix, and HydroCoil. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1757–63 pmid:16091526

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Killer M,
   3. Kallmes D,
   4. Jones R, et al

   . Long-term angiographic and histological results of a new hydrogel-containing filling coil in experimental rabbit aneurysms. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010;53:97–105 doi:10.1055/s-0030-1252059 pmid:20809449

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Gonzalez N,
   3. Sedrak M,
   4. Martin N, et al

   . Impact of anatomic features in the endovascular embolization of 181 anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Stroke 2008;39:2776–82 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505222 pmid:18617670

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. White PM,
   3. Lewis SC,
   4. Nahser H, et al

   ; HELPS Trial Collaboration. HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:217–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0936 pmid:18184832

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Guilbert F,
   4. Weill A, et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Songsaeng D,
   3. Geibprasert S,
   4. ter Brugge KG, et al

   . Impact of individual intracranial arterial aneurysm morphology on initial obliteration and recurrence rates of endovascular treatments: a multivariate analysis. J Neurosurg 2011;114:994–1002 doi:10.3171/2010.8.JNS10241 pmid:20932093

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Chung EJ,
    3. Shin YS,
    4. Lee CH, et al

    . Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes among stent-assisted, double-catheter, and balloon-assisted coil embolization of wide neck aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:1289–95 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2104-y pmid:24806533

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Cognard C,
    4. Anxionnat R, et al

    ; CLARITY Investigators. Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting midterm quality anatomic results: analysis in a prospective, multicenter series of patients (CLARITY). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1475–80 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3003 pmid:22517279

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. Kallmes DF

    . Difficult aneurysms for endovascular treatment: overwide or undertall? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1513–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1633 pmid:19461057

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Luo B,
    3. Yang X,
    4. Wang S, et al

    . High shear stress and flow velocity in partially occluded aneurysms prone to recanalization. Stroke 2011;42:745–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593517 pmid:21233477

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Irie K,
    3. Anzai H,
    4. Kojima M, et al

    . Computational fluid dynamic analysis following recurrence of cerebral aneurysm after coil embolization. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:109–15 doi:10.4103/1793-5482.103706 pmid:23293665

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Morita A,
    3. Kirino T,
    4. Hashi K, et al

    ; UCAS Japan Investigators. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2474–82 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113260 pmid:22738097

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Mehan WA Jr.,
    3. Romero JM,
    4. Hirsch JA, et al

    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms conservatively followed with serial CT angiography: could morphology and growth predict rupture? J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:761–66 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010944 pmid:24275611

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Morales HG,
    3. Kim M,
    4. Vivas EE, et al

    . How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1935–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2635 pmid:21885712

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Kallmes DF

    . Aneurysm packing with HydroCoil embolic system versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:60–62 pmid:14729529

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Gaba RC,
    3. Ansari SA,
    4. Roy SS, et al

    . Embolization of intracranial aneurysms with hydrogel-coated coils versus inert platinum coils: effects on packing density, coil length and quantity, procedure performance, cost, length of hospital stay, and durability of therapy. Stroke 2006;37:1443–50 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000221314.55144.0b pmid:16675742

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Killer M,
    3. Arthur AS,
    4. Barr JD, et al

    . Histomorphology of thrombus organization, neointima formation, and foreign body response in retrieved human aneurysms treated with HydroCoil devices. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;94:486–92 doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31660 pmid:20574973

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Killer M,
    3. Hauser T,
    4. Wenger A, et al

    . Comparison of experimental aneurysms embolized with second-generation embolic devices and platinum coils. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:497–505; discussion 505 doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0237-1 pmid:19290469

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Rezek I,
    3. Mousan G,
    4. Wang Z, et al

    . Coil type does not affect angiographic follow-up outcomes of cerebral aneurysm coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1769–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3598 pmid:23660290

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Wei D,
    3. Wei C,
    4. Huang S, et al

    . Comparison between effects of HydroCoil embolic system and ordinary coil on large- and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms. Pak J Med Sci 2013;29:1334–37 pmid:24550948

    PubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Seo JH,
    4. Lee SJ, et al

    . Mid-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with HydroSoft coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:1687–94 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2157-y pmid:24975277

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Molyneux AJ,
    3. Clarke A,
    4. Sneade M, et al

    . Cerecyte coil trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either Cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke 2012;43:2544–50 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.657254 pmid:22836352

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Suh SH,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. Huston J 3rd., et al

    . Interobserver variability of aneurysm morphology: discrimination of the daughter sac. J Neurointerv Surg 2014 Nov. 10 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011471 pmid:25385747

    Abstract/FREE Full Text