Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Moelker A,
   3. Maas RA,
   4. Pattynama PM

   . Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding. Radiology 2004;232:107–13

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Quirk ME,
   3. Letendre AJ,
   4. Ciottone RA, et al

   . Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. Radiology 1989;170:463–66

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Brummett RE,
   3. Talbot JM,
   4. Charuhas P

   . Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. Radiology 1988;169:539–40

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Radomskij P,
   3. Schmidt MA,
   4. Heron CW, et al

   . Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function. Lancet 2002;359:1485

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. McJury M,
   3. Shellock FG

   . Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:37–45

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Reeves MJ,
   3. Brandreth M,
   4. Whitby EH, et al

   . Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging. Radiology 2010;257:802–09

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Hedeen RA,
   3. Edelstein WA

   . Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:7–10

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Mansfield P,
   3. Haywood B,
   4. Coxon R

   . Active acoustic control in gradient coils for MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:807–18

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Bowtell RW,
   3. Mansfield P

   . Quiet transverse gradient coils: Lorentz force balanced designs using geometrical similitude. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:494–97

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Mansfield P,
    3. Glover PM,
    4. Beaumont J

    . Sound generation in gradient coil structures for MRI. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:539–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Cho ZH,
    3. Chung ST,
    4. Chung JY, et al

    . A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:317–21

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Segbers M,
    3. Rizzo Sierra CV,
    4. Duifhuis H, et al

    . Shaping and timing gradient pulses to reduce MRI acoustic noise. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:546–53

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Hennel F,
    3. Girard F,
    4. Loenneker T

    . “Silent” MRI with soft gradient pulses. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:6–10

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Heismann B,
    3. Ott M,
    4. Grodzki D

    . Sequence-based acoustic noise reduction of clinical MRI scans. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:1104–09

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Pierre EY,
    3. Grodzki D,
    4. Aandal G, et al

    . Parallel imaging-based reduction of acoustic noise for clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2014;49:620–26

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Alibek S,
    3. Vogel M,
    4. Sun W, et al

    . Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20:360–63

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Ida M,
    3. Wakayama T,
    4. Nielsen ML, et al

    . Quiet T1-weighted imaging using PETRA: initial clinical evaluation in intracranial tumor patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:447–53

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Shellock FG,
    3. Morisoli SM,
    4. Ziarati M

    . Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six “worst-case” pulse sequences. Radiology 1994;191:91–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Moelker A,
    3. Wielopolski PA,
    4. Pattynama PM

    . Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels. MAGMA 2003;16:52–55

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Hurwitz R,
    3. Lane SR,
    4. Bell RA, et al

    . Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging. Radiology 1989;173:545–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Moelker A,
    3. Maas RA,
    4. Lethimonnier F, et al

    . Interventional MR imaging at 1.5 T: quantification of sound exposure. Radiology 2002;224:889–95

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Pipe JG,
    3. Gibbs WN,
    4. Li Z, et al

    . Revised motion estimation algorithm for PROPELLER MRI. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:430–37

    CrossRefPubMed