Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Lladó X,
   3. Oliver A,
   4. Cabezas M, et al

   . Segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI: a review of automated approaches. Information Sciences 2012;186:164–85

   CrossRef
2. 2.↵
   2. Lladó X,
   3. Ganiler O,
   4. Oliver A, et al

   . Automated detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in serial brain MRI. Neuroradiology 2012;54:787–807

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Zivadinov R,
   3. Bergsland N,
   4. Dolezai O, et al

   . Evolution of cortical and thalamus atrophy and disability progression in early relapsing-remitting MS during 5 years. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1931–39

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Battaglini M,
   3. Jenkinson M,
   4. De Stefano N

   . Evaluating and reducing the impact of white matter lesions on brain volume measurements. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:2062–71

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Chard DT,
   3. Jackson JS,
   4. Miller DH, et al

   . Reducing the impact of white matter lesions on automated measures of brain gray and white matter volumes. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:223–28

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Gelineau-Morel R,
   3. Tomassini V,
   4. Jenkinson M, et al

   . The effect of hypointense white matter lesions on automated gray matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:2802–14

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Ashburner J,
   3. Friston K

   . Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005;26:839–51

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Zhang Y,
   3. Brady M,
   4. Smith S

   . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Horsfield MA,
   3. Rovaris M,
   4. Rocca MA, et al

   . Whole-brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis measured by two segmentation processes from various MRI sequences. J Neurol Sci 2003;216:169–77

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Rudick RA,
    3. Lee JC,
    4. Nakamura K, et al

    . Gray matter atrophy correlates with MS disability progression measured with MSFC but not EDSS. J Neurol Sci 2009;282:106–11

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Rueckert D,
    3. Sonoda LI,
    4. Hayes C, et al

    . Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999;18:712–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Sled JG,
    3. Zijdenbos AP,
    4. Evans CP

    . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;17:87–97
14. 14.↵
    2. Kohonen T

    . The self-organizing map. Proceedings of the IEEE 1990;78:1464–80

    CrossRefWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Tian D,
    3. Fan L

    . A brain MR images segmentation method based on SOM neural network. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering ICBBE, Wuhan, People's Republic of China. July 6–8, 2007:686–89
16. 16.↵
    2. Pham DL

    . Spatial models for fuzzy clustering. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2001;84:285–97

    CrossRefWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Pham DL

    . Robust fuzzy segmentation of magnetic resonance images. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Bethesda, Maryland. July 26–27, 2001:127–31
18. 18.↵
    2. Bezdek JC,
    3. Keller J,
    4. Krishnapuram R, et al

    . Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999:1650.F89