Evidence Levels for Neuroradiology Articles: Low Agreement among Raters

References

1. 1.↵
   Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268:2420–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Howick JH

   . The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2011:15
3. 3.↵
   2. Sackett DL,
   3. Rosenberg WM,
   4. Gray JA, et al

   . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71–72

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Sackett DL,
   3. Strauss SE,
   4. Richardson WS, et al

   . Evidence Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:1–12
5. 5.↵
   The Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group. Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 2001;220:566–75

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Malone DE

   . Evidence-based practice in radiology: an introduction to the series. Radiology 2007;242:12–14

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Budovec JJ,
   3. Kahn CE

   . Evidence-based radiology: a primer in reading scientific articles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:W1–4

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Malone DE

   . Evidence-based practice in radiology: what color is your parachute? Abdom Imaging 2008;33:3–5

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Kelly AM

   . Evidence-based radiology: step 1—ask. Semin Roentgenol 2009;44:140–46

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Kelly AM

    . Evidence-based practice: an introduction and overview. Semin Roentgenol 2009;44:131–39

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Dodd JD

    . Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4—appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 2007;242:342–54

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Malone DE,
    3. Staunton M

    . Evidence-based practice in radiology: step 5 (evaluate)—caveats and common questions. Radiology 2007;243:319–28

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Haynes RB

    . Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding best current evidence. Evid Based Ment Health 2001;4:37–39

    FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Staunton M

    . Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2—asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 2007;242:23–31

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    Levels of evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Web site. http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/. Accessed March 2014.
16. 16.↵
    2. Harris RP,
    3. Helfand M,
    4. Woolf SH, et al

    . Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001;20:21–35

    PubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Maher MM,
    3. McNamara AM,
    4. MacEneaney PM, et al

    . Abdominal aortic aneurysms: elective endovascular repair versus conventional surgery—evaluation with evidence-based medicine techniques. Radiology 2003;228:647–58

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Bossuyt PM,
    3. Reitsma JB,
    4. Bruns DE, et al

    . Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Radiology 2003;226:24–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Smidt N,
    3. Rutjes AW,
    4. van der Windt DA, et al

    . Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2005;235:347–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Loke YK,
    3. Derry S

    . Does anybody read “evidence-based” articles? BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:14

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Moher D,
    3. Cook DJ,
    4. Eastwood S, et al

    . Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896–900

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Weeks WB,
    3. Wallace AE

    . Readability of British and American medical prose at the start of the 21st century. BMJ 2002;325:1451–52

    FREE Full Text