Anterior Choroidal Artery Patency and Clinical Follow-Up after Coverage with the Pipeline Embolization Device

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Nelson PK,
   3. Lylyk P,
   4. Szikora I, et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Szikora I,
   3. Berentei Z,
   4. Kulcsar Z, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Miranda C,
   4. Ceratto R, et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–43; quiz N6

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Fiorella D,
   3. Lylyk P,
   4. Szikora I, et al

   . Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:56–65

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Appanaboyina S,
   3. Mut F,
   4. Löhner , et al

   . Computational modelling of blood flow in side arterial branches after stenting of cerebral aneurysms. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 2008;22:669–76

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Raschi M,
   4. Mut F, et al

   . Analysis of flow changes in side branches jailed by flow diverters in rabbit models. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2014;30:988–99

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Seong J,
   3. Wakhloo AK,
   4. Lieber BB

   . In vitro evaluation of flow divertors in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:863–72

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Raz E,
   3. Tanweer O,
   4. Becske T, et al

   . Ophthalmic artery patency and clinical follow-up after placement of Pipeline embolization device. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, San Diego, California. May 18–23, 2013
10. 10.↵
    2. Puffer RC,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:892–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Lopes DK,
    3. Ringer AJ,
    4. Boulos AS, et al

    . Fate of branch arteries after intracranial stenting. Neurosurgery 2003;52:1275–78; discussion 1278–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Wakhloo AK,
    3. Tio FO,
    4. Lieber BB, et al

    . Self-expanding nitinol stents in canine vertebral arteries: hemodynamics and tissue response. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1043–51

    Abstract
13. 13.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Building multidevice Pipeline constructs of favorable metal coverage: a practical guide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1556–61

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Becske T,
    4. Riina HA, et al

    . Toward an endovascular internal carotid artery classification system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:230–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Takahashi S,
    3. Suga T,
    4. Kawata Y, et al

    . Anterior choroidal artery: angiographic analysis of variations and anomalies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:719–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Kang HS,
    3. Kwon BJ,
    4. Kwon OK, et al

    . Endovascular coil embolization of anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2009;111:963–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Alderazi YJ,
    3. Shastri D,
    4. Kass-Hout T, et al

    . Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms. Stroke Res Treat 2014;2014:415653

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Lee M,
    3. Saver JL,
    4. Hao Q, et al

    . Anterior choroidal artery ischaemic patterns predict outcome of carotid occlusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:586–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Sluzewski M

    . Perforator infarction after placement of a Pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:E43–44

    FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Bing F,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. Salazkin I, et al

    . Stents and flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms: device deformation in vivo may alter porosity and impact efficacy. Neuroradiology 2013;55:85–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science