Extra-Aneurysmal Flow Modification Following Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation: Focus on Regional Branches, Perforators, and the Parent Vessel

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Deutschmann HA,
   3. Wehrschuetz M,
   4. Augustin M, et al

   . Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: results from a single center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:481–86

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Fischer S,
   3. Vajda Z,
   4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

   . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Lubicz B,
   3. Collignon L,
   4. Raphaeli G, et al

   . Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2011;76:114–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. McAuliffe W,
   3. Wenderoth JD

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:487–93

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Nelson PK,
   3. Lylyk P,
   4. Szikora I, et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Szikora I,
   3. Berentei Z,
   4. Kulcsar Z, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Tjoumakaris S,
   4. Starke RM, et al

   . Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2150–54

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Ding YH,
   4. Dai D, et al

   . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. D'Urso PI,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review. Stroke 2011;42:2363–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Kojima M,
    3. Irie K,
    4. Fukuda T, et al

    . The study of flow diversion effects on aneurysm using multiple Enterprise stents and two flow diverters. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:159–65

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Roszelle BN,
    3. Gonzalez LF,
    4. Babiker MH, et al

    . Flow diverter effect on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: an in vitro comparison of telescoping stents and the Pipeline. Neuroradiology 2013;55:751–58

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Shobayashi Y,
    3. Tateshima S,
    4. Kakizaki R, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations by a self-expandable intracranial stent and flow diversion stent: high intra-aneurysmal pressure remains regardless of flow velocity reduction. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(suppl 3):iii38–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Raschi M, et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Hampton T,
    3. Walsh D,
    4. Tolias C, et al

    . Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:167–71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Siddiqui AH,
    3. Kan P,
    4. Abla AA, et al

    . Complications after treatment with Pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 2012;71:E509–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Velat GJ,
    3. Fargen KM,
    4. Lawson MF, et al

    . Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage following Pipeline embolization device treatment for a giant recanalized ophthalmic aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:e24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Puffer RC,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:892–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Lee DH,
    3. Arat A,
    4. Morsi H, et al

    . Dual antiplatelet therapy monitoring for neurointerventional procedures using a point-of-care platelet function test: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1389–94

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Yu SC,
    3. Kwok CK,
    4. Cheng PW, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device–a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Dai D,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Kadirvel R, et al

    . Patency of branches after coverage with multiple telescoping flow-diverter devices: an in vivo study in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:171–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Lopes DK,
    3. Johnson AK

    . Evaluation of cerebral artery perforators and the Pipeline embolization device using optical coherence tomography. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:291–94

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Roszelle BN,
    3. Babiker MH,
    4. Hafner W, et al

    . In vitro and in silico study of intracranial stent treatments for cerebral aneurysms: effects on perforating vessel flows. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:354–60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Appanaboyina S,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Löhner R, et al

    . Computational modelling of blood flow in side arterial branches after stenting of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Comut Fluid Dyn 2008;22:669–76

    CrossRef
26. 26.↵
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Cesar L,
    4. Seong J, et al

    . Treatment of rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm models by flow diverters: development of quantifiable indexes of device performance using digital subtraction angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1117–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Djulejić V,
    3. Marinkovic S,
    4. Malikovic A, et al

    . Morphometric analysis, region of supply and microanatomy of the lenticulostriate arteries and their clinical significance. J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:1416–21

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Sluzewski M

    . Perforator infarction after placement of a Pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:E43–44

    FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Phillips TJ,
    3. Wenderoth JD,
    4. Phatouros CC, et al

    . Safety of the Pipeline embolization device in treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1225–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Cho AH,
    3. Suh DC,
    4. Kim GE, et al

    . MRI evidence of reperfusion injury associated with neurological deficits after carotid revascularization procedures. Eur J Neurol 2009;16:1066–69

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Lieb M,
    3. Shah U,
    4. Hines GL

    . Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid intervention: a review. Cardiol Rev 2012;20:84–89

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Kuroki K,
    3. Taguchi H,
    4. Yukawa O

    . Hyperperfusion syndrome after clipping of an unruptured aneurysm: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:248–50

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Maruya J,
    3. Nishimaki K,
    4. Minakawa T

    . Hyperperfusion syndrome after neck clipping of a ruptured aneurysm on a dolichoectatic middle cerebral artery. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;20:260–63

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Sugino T,
    3. Ohtaki M,
    4. Wanibuchi M, et al

    . Hyperperfusion syndrome after clipping an unruptured cerebral aneurysm: two case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010;50:306–09

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Aubert S,
    3. Sellal F,
    4. Rouyer O, et al

    . Reperfusion syndrome with cerebral vasogenic edema after carotid artery endarterectomy [in French]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2007;163:840–44

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Narita S,
    3. Aikawa H,
    4. Nagata S, et al

    . Intraprocedural prediction of hemorrhagic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:615–19

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Chiu AH,
    3. Wenderoth J

    . Cerebral hyperperfusion after flow diversion of large intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:e48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Karapanayiotides T,
    3. Meuli R,
    4. Devuyst G, et al

    . Postcarotid endarterectomy hyperperfusion or reperfusion syndrome. Stroke 2005;36:21–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    2. Murakami H,
    3. Inaba M,
    4. Nakamura A, et al

    . Ipsilateral hyperperfusion after neck clipping of a giant internal carotid artery aneurysm: case report. J Neurosurg 2002;97:1233–36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    2. Levitt MR,
    3. McGah PM,
    4. Aliseda A, et al

    . Cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: computational models with intravascular blood flow measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:143–48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. Chow M,
    4. O'Kelly C, et al

    . Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:603–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Houdart E,
    4. Bonafe A, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    2. Velat GJ,
    3. Fargen KM,
    4. Lawson MF, et al

    . Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage following Pipeline embolization device treatment for a giant recanalized ophthalmic aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:e24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text