Hemodynamic Differences in Intracranial Aneurysms before and after Rupture

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Brisman JL,
   3. Song JK,
   4. Newell DW

   . Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006;355:928–39

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Vlak MH,
   3. Algra A,
   4. Brandenburg R, et al

   . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Nieuwkamp DJ,
   3. Setz LE,
   4. Algra A, et al

   . Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:635–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Gabriel RA,
   3. Kim H,
   4. Sidney S, et al

   . Ten-year detection rate of brain arteriovenous malformations in a large, multiethnic, defined population. Stroke 2010;41:21–26

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. van Rooij WJ,
   3. Sprengers ME,
   4. de Gast AN, et al

   . 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:976–79

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Greving JP,
   3. Wermer MJ,
   4. Brown RD, et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Mut F,
   4. Weir J, et al

   . Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:145–51

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Xiang J,
   3. Natarajan SK,
   4. Tremmel M, et al

   . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Backes D,
   3. Vergouwen MDI,
   4. Velthuis BK, et al

   . Difference in aneurysm characteristics between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2014;45:1299–303

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Shojima M,
    3. Oshima M,
    4. Takagi K, et al

    . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Meng H,
    3. Tutino VM,
    4. Xiang J, et al

    . High WSS or Low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1254–62

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Xiang J,
    3. Tutino VM,
    4. Snyder KV, et al

    . CFD: computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination? The role of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1849–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Rahman M,
    3. Ogilvy CS,
    4. Zipfel GJ, et al

    . Unruptured cerebral aneurysms do not shrink when they rupture: multicenter collaborative aneurysm study group. Neurosurgery 2011;68:155–60; discussion 160–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. Marquering HA,
    4. van den Berg R, et al

    . Rupture-associated changes of cerebral aneurysm geometry: high-resolution 3D imaging before and after rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1358–62

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Manniesing R,
    3. Velthuis BK,
    4. van Leeuwen MS, et al

    . Level set based cerebral vasculature segmentation and diameter quantification in CT angiography. Med Image Anal 2006;10:200–14

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Cremers D,
    3. Rousson M,
    4. Deriche R

    . A review of statistical approaches to level set segmentation: integrating color, texture, motion and shape. Int J Comput Vis 2007;72:195–215

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    2. Luboz V,
    3. Wu X,
    4. Krissian K, et al

    . A segmentation and reconstruction technique for 3D vascular structures. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005;8(pt 1):43–50

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Antiga L,
    3. Piccinelli M,
    4. Botti L, et al

    . An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1097–112

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Omodaka S,
    3. Inoue T,
    4. Funamoto K, et al

    . Influence of surface model extraction parameter on computational fluid dynamics modeling of cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech 2012;45:2355–61

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Hoi Y,
    3. Woodward SH,
    4. Kim M, et al

    . Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations. J Biomech Eng 2006;128:844–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. Marquering HA,
    4. Antiga L, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: the impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:121–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Moench T,
    3. Neugebauer M,
    4. Preim B

    . Optimization of vascular surface models for computational fluid dynamics and rapid prototyping. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Digital Engineering, Magdeburg, Germany. November 21–22, 2011:16–23
23. 23.↵
    Blender Foundation. Blender. Free Open 3D Creat Softw. 1995. http://www.blender.org/. Accessed October 9, 2013.
24. 24.↵
    2. Yushkevich PA,
    3. Piven J,
    4. Hazlett HC, et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Taubin G

    . Curve and surface smoothing without shrinkage. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, Boston, Massachusetts. June 22–23, 1995
26. 26.↵
    2. Ortega J,
    3. Hartman J,
    4. Rodriguez J, et al

    . Post-treatment hemodynamics of a basilar aneurysm and bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1531–46

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Cabannes H,
    2. Temam R

    2. Caretto LS,
    3. Gosman AD,
    4. Patankar SV, et al

    . Two calculation procedures for steady, three-dimensional flows with recirculation. In: Cabannes H, Temam R, eds. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1973:60–68
28. 28.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Appanaboyina S, et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Weir J, et al

    . Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:264–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Ku DN,
    3. Giddens DP,
    4. Zarins CK, et al

    . Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985;5:293–302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Chien A,
    3. Sayre J

    . Morphologic and hemodynamic risk factors in ruptured aneurysms imaged before and after rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2130–35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Duan G,
    3. Lv N,
    4. Yin J, et al

    . Morphological and hemodynamic analysis of posterior communicating artery aneurysms prone to rupture: a matched case-control study. J Neurointerv Surg 2014 Nov 17. [Epub ahead of print]
33. 33.↵
    2. Liu J,
    3. Fan J,
    4. Xiang J, et al

    . Hemodynamic characteristics of large unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms prior to rupture: a case control study. J Neurointerv Surg 2015 Feb 4. [Epub ahead of print]
34. 34.↵
    2. Kono K,
    3. Tomura N,
    4. Yoshimura R, et al

    . Changes in wall shear stress magnitude after aneurysm rupture. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:1559–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Bor AS,
    3. Tiel Groenestege AT,
    4. terBrugge KG, et al

    . Clinical, radiological, and flow-related risk factors for growth of untreated, unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2015;46:42–48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Potters WV,
    3. van Ooij P,
    4. Marquering H, et al

    . Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:505–16

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Schneiders JJ,
    4. Potters WV, et al

    . Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1543–48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Dempere-Marco L,
    3. Oubel E,
    4. Castro M, et al

    . CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006;9:438–45

    PubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Valen-Sendstad K,
    3. Steinman DA

    . Mind the gap: impact of computational fluid dynamics solution strategy on prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics and rupture status indicators. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:536–43

    Abstract/FREE Full Text