International Retrospective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Multicenter Aneurysm Treatment Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Arrese I,
   3. Sarabia R,
   4. Pintado R, et al

   . Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2013;73:193–99; discussion 199–200

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Briganti F,
   3. Napoli M,
   4. Tortora F, et al

   . Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications: a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1145–52

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Murad MH,
   4. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Yu SC,
   3. Kwok CK,
   4. Cheng PW, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device: a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Chan TT,
   3. Chan KY,
   4. Pang PK, et al

   . Pipeline embolisation device for wide-necked internal carotid artery aneurysms in a hospital in Hong Kong: preliminary experience. Hong Kong Med J 2011;17:398–404

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Cirillo L,
   3. Dall'Olio M,
   4. Princiotta C, et al

   . The use of flow-diverting stents in the treatment of giant cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results. Neuroradiol J 2010;23:220–24

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Siddiqui AH,
   3. Kan P,
   4. Abla AA, et al

   . Complications after treatment with Pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 2012;71:E509–13; discussion E513

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Cruz JP,
   3. Chow M,
   4. O'Kelly C, et al

   . Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:603–08

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Pierot L

   . Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: where are we? J Neuroradiol 2011;38:40–46

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Rayner-Hartley E,
    4. Makoyeva A, et al

    . Aneurysm rupture after endovascular flow diversion: the possible role of persistent flows through the transition zone associated with device deformation. Interv Neuroradiol 2013;19:180–85

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Kuzmik GA,
    3. Williamson T,
    4. Ediriwickrema A, et al

    . Flow diverters and a tale of two aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:e23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Turowski B,
    3. Macht S,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Collignon L,
    4. Raphaeli G, et al

    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Piano M,
    3. Valvassori L,
    4. Quilici L, et al

    . Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2013;118:408–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Delgado Almandoz JE,
    3. Crandall BM,
    4. Scholz JM, et al

    . Pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction units value predicts perioperative thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(suppl 3):iii3–10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Delgado Almandoz JE,
    3. Crandall BM,
    4. Scholz JM, et al

    . Last-recorded P2Y12 reaction units value is strongly associated with thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications occurring up to 6 months after treatment in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:128–35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Hanel RA,
    3. Taussky P,
    4. Dixon T, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of ticagrelor for neuroendovascular procedures: a single center initial experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:320–22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. el-Chalouhi N,
    3. Jabbour PM,
    4. Tjoumakaris SI, et al

    . Treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: cost comparison of flow diversion and traditional embolization strategies. World Neurosurg 2014;82:696–701

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. McMahon JF,
    4. Moukarzel LA, et al

    . Flow diversion versus traditional aneurysm embolization strategies: analysis of fluoroscopy and procedure times. J Neurointervent Surg 2014;6:291–95

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Dumont AS, et al

    . Treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2013;72:883–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Tjoumakaris S, et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013;73:113–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Chitale R,
    3. Gonzalez LF,
    4. Randazzo C, et al

    . Single center experience with Pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications. Neurosurgery 2012;71:679–91

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Starke RM, et al

    . Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2150–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. O'Kelly CJ,
    3. Spears J,
    4. Chow M, et al

    . Canadian experience with the Pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:381–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. O'Kelly C,
    4. Kelly M, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:271–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Kan P,
    3. Siddiqui AH,
    4. Veznedaroglu E, et al

    . Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: A US multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2012;71:1080–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Siddiqui AH,
    3. Abla AA,
    4. Kan P, et al

    . Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms—clinical article. J Neurosurg 2012;116:1258–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. de Barros Faria M,
    3. Castro RN,
    4. Lundquist J, et al

    . The role of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2192–95

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Leonardi M,
    3. Cirillo L,
    4. Toni F, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting Silk stents (BALT): a single centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:306–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Velioglu M,
    3. Kizilkilic O,
    4. Selcuk H, et al

    . Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1355–65

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Hu YC,
    3. Deshmukh VR,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . Histopathological assessment of fatal ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhages after the treatment of supraclinoid aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurosurg 2014;120:365–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Beltechi R,
    4. Yarnold JA, et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:pii: e12492

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. McAuliffe W,
    3. Wycoco V,
    4. Rice H, et al

    . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Wong GK,
    3. Kwan MC,
    4. Ng RY, et al

    . Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status and ongoing clinical trials. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:737–40

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Tähtinen OI,
    3. Manninen HI,
    4. Vanninen RL, et al

    . The Silk flow-diverting stent in the endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: technical aspects and midterm results in 24 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2012;70:617–23; discussion 623–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. McLaughlin N,
    3. McArthur DL,
    4. Martin NA

    . Use of stent-assisted coil embolization for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms: a systematic review. Surg Neurol Int 2013;4:43

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Bodily KD,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1232–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Becske T,
    4. Sahlein D, et al

    . Stent-supported aneurysm coiling: a literature survey of treatment and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:159–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. Woo H, et al

    . Neuroform stent assisted aneurysm treatment: evolving treatment strategies, complications and results of long term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:16–22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    2. Piotin M,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Spelle L, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Yang S, et al

    . Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 2014;45:54–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text