Research ArticleNeurointervention
Transverse Sinus Stenting for Pseudotumor Cerebri: A Cost Comparison with CSF Shunting
R.M. Ahmed, F. Zmudzki, G.D. Parker, B.K. Owler and G.M. Halmagyi
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2014, 35 (5) 952-958; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3806
R.M. Ahmed
aFrom the Departments of Neurology (R.A., G.M.H.)
F. Zmudzki
cÉpoque Consulting (F.Z.), Sydney, Australia
G.D. Parker
bRadiology (G.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Australia
B.K. Owler
dTY Nelson Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (B.O.), Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
eDiscipline of Pediatrics and Child Health, and Surgery (B.O.), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
G.M. Halmagyi
aFrom the Departments of Neurology (R.A., G.M.H.)

REFERENCES
- 1.↵
- Ahmed RM,
- Wilkinson M,
- Parker GD,
- et al
- 2.↵
- Kumpe DA,
- Bennett JL,
- Seinfeld J,
- et al
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- Simon TD,
- Riva-Cambrin J,
- Srivastava R,
- et al
- 6.↵
Department of Health and Aging. Manual of Resource Items and Their Associated Costs, for Use in Major Submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee Involving Economic Analyses. Version 4.0. Australian Government, Department of Health and Aging, Canberra, Australia, December 2009
- 7.↵
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2012. Health Expenditure Australia 2010–11: Health and Welfare Expenditure Series No. 47. Cat. No. HWE 56. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- Patwardhan RV,
- Nanda A
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- Del Bigio MR
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- Sinclair AJ,
- Kuruvath S,
- Sen D,
- et al
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- Wang VY,
- Barbaro NM,
- Lawton MT,
- et al
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- Burgett RA,
- Purvin VA,
- Kawasaki A
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- Sciubba DM,
- Lin LM,
- Woodworth GF,
- et al
In this issue
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 5
1 May 2014
Advertisement
R.M. Ahmed, F. Zmudzki, G.D. Parker, B.K. Owler, G.M. Halmagyi
Transverse Sinus Stenting for Pseudotumor Cerebri: A Cost Comparison with CSF Shunting
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2014, 35 (5) 952-958; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3806
0 Responses
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Transverse venous sinus stenting versus cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a multi-institutional and multinational database study
- Venous sinus stenting versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting: comparing clinical outcomes for idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- Utility of CT venography in monitoring stent patency in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: retrospective single-center study
- Another version of the truth
- Predictors for venous sinus stent retreatment in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- Dural sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: factors associated with hemodynamic failure and management with extended stenting
- Venous sinus stenting in patients without idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- Republished: Delayed relapse in pseudotumor cerebri due to new stenosis after transverse sinus stenting
- Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
- Delayed relapse in pseudotumor cerebri due to new stenosis after transverse sinus stenting
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement