Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticlePatient Safety
Open Access

Improved Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Achieved by Use of Dose-Reduced Gadolinium Blood-Pool Agents for Time-Resolved Intracranial MR Angiography

S. Dehkharghani, J. Kang and A.M. Saindane
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2014, 35 (3) 450-456; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3693
S. Dehkharghani
aFrom Neuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (S.D., A.M.S.), Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Kang
bDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (J.K.), Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.M. Saindane
aFrom Neuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (S.D., A.M.S.), Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Patient (71-year-old man) undergoing successive TR-MRA, spaced approximately 1 year apart, for evaluation of previously coiled left ophthalmic artery aneurysm. Images obtained after injection of SCA (A–D) and obtained with BPA (E–H). Background-subtracted (A and E) and unsubtracted (B and F) axial MIP volumes from SCA and BPA TR-MRA, respectively; C,G,D, and H are background-subtracted axial source MRA images from peak arterial phases derived from SCA (phase 7) and BPA (phase 9) examinations. Note the improved demonstration of mid and distal MCA branches in both hemispheres with administration of the blood-pool agent.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Patient (68-year-old woman) undergoing successive TR-MRA spaced approximately 1 year apart, for evaluation of angiographically documented indirect dural arteriovenous fistula (arrow). Images in A–C were obtained with injection of SCA; images in D–F were obtained with BPA. Early arterial (A, D), late arterial (B, E), and venous (C, F) axial MIP phases are presented as indicated. Qualitatively superior time-resolved angiography was scored for all temporal phases and arterial segments, with consideration to diagnostic confidence and vessel-background contrast. Note the generally delayed arrival/temporal phases with the slower administration rate of BPA.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Analysis of enhancement kinetics: BPA versus SCA

    CategoryBPASCAP Value
    Presence of uncontaminated arterial phase,a %68 ± 4768 ± 471
    Peak arterial phaseb (sub)6.96 ± 1.636.15 ± 1.84.023
    Peak arterial phaseb (unsub)6.96 ± 1.636.15 ± 1.84.023
    Peak venous phaseb (sub)8.52 ± 1.648.0 ± 1.68.123
    Peak venous phaseb (unsub)8.52 ± 1.648.0 ± 1.68.123
    Peak venous–peak arterial phaseb (sub)1.56 ± 1.071.88 ± 1.19.161
    Peak venous–peak arterial phaseb (unsub)1.56 ± 1.071.86 ± 1.18.186
    • Note:—All values are reported as mean ± standard deviation; sub, unsub reflect background subtracted and nonsubtracted volumes.

    • ↵a Percentage of cases with uncontaminated arteriographic phase (see text).

    • ↵b Expressed in terms of average, time-resolved phase number.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Qualitative analysis of image quality: BPA versus SCA

    BPAaSCAaP Value
    Arterial segment
        ICA (sub)2.74 ± 0.562.42 ± 0.76.019
        ICA (unsub)2.88 ± 0.332.56 ± 0.61.002
        M1 (sub)2.60 ± 0.672.50 ± 0.58.427
        M1 (unsub)2.80 ± 0.452.62 ± 0.49.059
        M2 (sub)2.38 ± 0.752.00 ± 0.78.015
        M2 (unsub)2.62 ± 0.572.24 ± 0.69.003
        M3 (sub)2.18 ± 0.771.56 ± 0.93<.001
        M3 (unsub)2.44 ± 0.581.76 ± 0.92<.001
    Venous segment
        Superficial (sub)2.94 ± 0.242.96 ± 0.20.650
        Superficial (unsub)2.98 ± 0.142.96 ± 0.2.562
    Artifactual degradation
        Deep (sub)2.80 ± 0.42.60 ± 0.53.037
        Deep (unsub)2.92 ± 0.272.74 ± 0.44.016
        Subtracted2.78 ± 0.552.74 ± 0.53.781
        Unsubtracted2.82 ± 0.442.74 ± 0.53.473
    Subtractionb
        Subtraction0.98 ± 0.140.92 ± 0.27.172
    • Note:—All values are reported as mean ± standard deviation; 0 indicates nondiagnostic; 1, diagnosis possible but limited; 2, good; 3, excellent; sub, unsub, subtracted and nonsubtracted.

    • ↵a Qualitative designation of diagnostic quality derived from 4-point scale (see text).

    • ↵b Indicates percentage of cases for which background subtraction was satisfactory.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 3
1 Mar 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improved Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Achieved by Use of Dose-Reduced Gadolinium Blood-Pool Agents for Time-Resolved Intracranial MR Angiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Dehkharghani, J. Kang, A.M. Saindane
Improved Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Achieved by Use of Dose-Reduced Gadolinium Blood-Pool Agents for Time-Resolved Intracranial MR Angiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2014, 35 (3) 450-456; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3693

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Improved Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Achieved by Use of Dose-Reduced Gadolinium Blood-Pool Agents for Time-Resolved Intracranial MR Angiography
S. Dehkharghani, J. Kang, A.M. Saindane
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2014, 35 (3) 450-456; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3693
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Safety of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Various Doses
  • Impact of Kidney Function on CNS Gadolinium Deposition in Patients Receiving Repeated Doses of Gadobutrol
  • Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Radiologic Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Setting
Show more Patient Safety

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire