Low-Tube-Voltage 80-kVp Neck CT: Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Sadick M,
   3. Schoenberg SO,
   4. Hoermann K, et al

   . Current oncologic concepts and emerging techniques for imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;11:Doc08

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Hermans R

   . Staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: value of imaging studies. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2386–400

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Castelijns JA,
   3. van den Brekel MW

   . Imaging of lymphadenopathy in the neck. Eur Radiol 2002;12:727–38

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Hoang JK,
   3. Branstetter BF 4th.,
   4. Eastwood JD, et al

   . Multiplanar CT and MRI of collections in the retropharyngeal space: is it an abscess? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W426–32

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Clavel S,
   3. Charron MP,
   4. Bélair M, et al

   . The role of computed tomography in the management of the neck after chemoradiotherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:567–73

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Brenner DJ,
   3. Hall EJ

   . Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Kalra MK,
   3. Maher MM,
   4. Toth TL, et al

   . Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 2004;233:649–57

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Bodelle B,
   3. Bauer RW,
   4. Holthaus L, et al

   . Dose and image quality of high-pitch dual source computed tomography for the evaluation of cervical lymph node status: comparison to regular 128-slice single source computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e281–85

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Schell B,
   3. Bauer RW,
   4. Lehnert T, et al

   . Low-dose computed tomography of the paranasal sinus and facial skull using a high-pitch dual-source system–first clinical results. Eur Radiol 2011;21:107–12

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Becker HC,
    3. Augart D,
    4. Karpitschka M, et al

    . Radiation exposure and image quality of normal computed tomography brain images acquired with automated and organ-based tube current modulation multiband filtering and iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol 2012;47:202–07

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Bodelle B,
    3. Klein E,
    4. Naguib NN, et al

    . Acute intracranial hemorrhage in CT: benefits of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:445–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Schulz B,
    3. Beeres M,
    4. Bodelle B, et al

    . Performance of iterative image reconstruction in CT of the paranasal sinuses: a phantom study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1072–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Nakayama Y,
    3. Awai K,
    4. Funama Y, et al

    . Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 2005;237:945–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Macari M,
    3. Spieler B,
    4. Kim D, et al

    . Dual-source dual-energy MDCT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial observations with data generated at 80 kVp and at simulated weighted-average 120 kVp. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W27–32

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Nakaura T,
    3. Awai K,
    4. Oda S, et al

    . Low-kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1332–38

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Gnannt R,
    3. Winklehner A,
    4. Goetti R, et al

    . Low kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1014–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Hoang JK,
    3. Yoshizumi TT,
    4. Nguyen G, et al

    . Variation in tube voltage for adult neck MDCT: effect on radiation dose and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:621–27

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Toepker M,
    3. Czerny C,
    4. Ringl H, et al

    . Can dual-energy CT improve the assessment of tumor margins in oral cancer? Oral Oncol 2014;50:221–27

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Sullivan BP,
    3. Parks KA,
    4. Dean NR, et al

    . Utility of CT surveillance for primary site recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2011;33:1547–50

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Meinel FG,
    3. Canstein C,
    4. Schoepf UJ, et al

    . Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3(rd) generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1643–50

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Zhang WL,
    3. Li M,
    4. Zhang B, et al

    . CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality. PLoS One 2013;8:e81486

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Xia W,
    3. Wu JT,
    4. Yin XR, et al

    . CT angiography of the neck: value of contrast medium dose reduction with low tube voltage and high tube current in a 64-detector row CT. Clin Radiol 2014;69:e183–89

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Kayan M,
    3. Köroğlu M,
    4. Yešildağ A, et al

    . Carotid CT-angiography: low versus standard volume contrast media and low kV protocol for 128-slice MDCT. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2144–47

    CrossRefPubMed