Evaluation of a Metal Artifacts Reduction Algorithm Applied to Postinterventional Flat Panel Detector CT Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Gupta R,
   3. Cheung AC,
   4. Bartling SH, et al

   . Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics 2008;28:2009–22

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Prell D,
   3. Kyriakou Y,
   4. Struffert T, et al

   . Metal artifact reduction for clipping and coiling in interventional C-arm CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:634–39

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Kalender WA,
   3. Hebel R,
   4. Ebersberger J

   . Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987;164:576–77

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Prell D,
   3. Kyriakou Y,
   4. Beister M, et al

   . A novel forward projection-based metal artifact reduction method for flat-detector computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:6575–91

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Meyer E,
   3. Raupach R,
   4. Lell M, et al

   . Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 2010;37:5482–93

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Landis JR,
   3. Koch GG

   . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Horowitz MB,
   3. Crammond D,
   4. Balzer J, et al

   . Aneurysm rupture during endovascular coiling: effects on cerebral transit time and neurophysiologic monitoring and the benefits of early ventriculostomy: case report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003;46:300–05

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Levy E,
   3. Koebbe CJ,
   4. Horowitz MB, et al

   . Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during endovascular coiling: management and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2001;49:807–11, discussion 811–13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Cloft HJ,
   3. Kallmes DF

   . Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1706–09

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Heran NS,
    3. Song JK,
    4. Namba K, et al

    . The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:330–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Ionescu M,
    3. Metcalfe RW,
    4. Cody D, et al

    . Spatial resolution limits of multislice computed tomography (MS-CT), C-arm-CT, and flat panel-CT (FP-CT) compared to MicroCT for visualization of a small metallic stent. Acad Radiol 2011;18:866–75

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Saake M,
    3. Goelitz P,
    4. Struffert T, et al

    . Comparison of conventional CTA and volume perfusion CTA in evaluation of cerebral arterial vasculature in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2068–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. van der Bom IM,
    3. Hou SY,
    4. Puri AS, et al

    . Reduction of coil mass artifacts in high-resolution flat detector conebeam CT of cerebral stent-assisted coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2163–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Psychogios MN,
    3. Scholz B,
    4. Rohkohl C, et al

    . Impact of a new metal artefact reduction algorithm in the noninvasive follow-up of intracranial clips, coils, and stents with flat-panel angiographic CTA: initial results. Neuroradiology 2013;55:813–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Buhk JH,
    3. Groth M,
    4. Sehner S, et al

    . Application of a novel metal artifact correction algorithm in flat-panel CT after coil embolization of brain aneurysms: intraindividual comparison. Rofo 2013;185:824–29

    CrossRefPubMed