Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Phase White Matter Signal Abnormalities in Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Other Neurologic Disorders

J. Hagemeier, M. Heininen-Brown, T. Gabelic, T. Guttuso, N. Silvestri, D. Lichter, L.E. Fugoso, N. Bergsland, E. Carl, J.J.G. Geurts, B. Weinstock-Guttman and R. Zivadinov
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2014, 35 (10) 1916-1923; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3969
J. Hagemeier
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (J.H., M.H.-B., T. Gabelic, N.B., E.C., R.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Heininen-Brown
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (J.H., M.H.-B., T. Gabelic, N.B., E.C., R.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Gabelic
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (J.H., M.H.-B., T. Gabelic, N.B., E.C., R.Z.)
cDepartment of Neurology (T. Gabelic), Referral Centre for Demyelinating Disease of the Central Nervous System, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Guttuso Jr
bBaird MS Center (T. Guttuso, N.S., D.L., L.E.F., B.W.-G., R.Z.), Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Silvestri
bBaird MS Center (T. Guttuso, N.S., D.L., L.E.F., B.W.-G., R.Z.), Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Lichter
bBaird MS Center (T. Guttuso, N.S., D.L., L.E.F., B.W.-G., R.Z.), Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.E. Fugoso
bBaird MS Center (T. Guttuso, N.S., D.L., L.E.F., B.W.-G., R.Z.), Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Bergsland
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (J.H., M.H.-B., T. Gabelic, N.B., E.C., R.Z.)
dIstituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (N.B.), Don Gnocchi Foundation, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Carl
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (J.H., M.H.-B., T. Gabelic, N.B., E.C., R.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.J.G. Geurts
eDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences (J.J.G.G.), Section of Clinical Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Weinstock-Guttman
bBaird MS Center (T. Guttuso, N.S., D.L., L.E.F., B.W.-G., R.Z.), Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Zivadinov
aFrom the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (J.H., M.H.-B., T. Gabelic, N.B., E.C., R.Z.)
bBaird MS Center (T. Guttuso, N.S., D.L., L.E.F., B.W.-G., R.Z.), Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Phase (top) and FLAIR imaging (bottom) WM signal abnormalities in patients with clinically isolated syndrome, other neurologic diseases, and healthy controls. Red arrows indicate a hypointense ring on nodular-phase WM-SAs on SWI. Note the presence of phase WM-SA in the right periventricular region in the patient with CIS, which is not present on FLAIR.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    ROC curves for the number of phase white matter signal abnormalities in differentiating patients with clinically isolated syndrome versus healthy controls (A) and patients with CIS versus those with other neurologic diseases (B).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Demographic characteristics of patients with clinically isolated syndrome and other neurologic disorders and healthy controlsa

    CIS (n = 48)HC (n = 47)PONDb (n = 30)Pc
    Male/female11:3712:35.7667:23.827
    Age (yr) (mean)40.7 ± 11.640.1 ± 10.7.81440.9 ± 15.6.780
    Age at diagnosis (yr) (mean)38.3 ± 11.6––34.6 ± 17.1–
    Disease duration (yr) (mean)2.8 ± 3.9––12.3 ± 11.2–
    Expanded Disability Status Scale (median ± IQR)1.5 ± 1––––
    Disease modifying therapy (No.) (%)
        No therapy21, 43.8
        Interferon β 1a19, 39.6––––
        Glatiramer acetate7, 14.5
        Other1, 2.1
    Type of OND (No.) (%)b
        Degenerative10 (33.3)
        Autoimmune–––10 (33.3)–
        Vascular10 (33.3)
    WM-SAV5.1 ± 8.80.1 ± 0.3<.0013.4 ± 8.6.042
    Normalized brain volume1532.6 ± 61.91556.4 ± 77.9.1031549.3 ± 101.733
    Normalized GM volume785.8 ± 45.7783.6 ± 45.1.814786.9 ± 82.5.816
    Normalized WM volume746.9 ± 28.9772.8 ± 49.8.003762.4 ± 37.6.332
    Normalized lateral ventricle volume36.6 ± 15.230.5 ± 10.3.03236.2 ± 21.9.151
    • Note:—CIS indicates clinically isolated syndrome; HC, healthy controls; IQR, interquartile range; OND, other neurological disorders; –, not applicable; WA-SAV, white matter signal abnormality volume.

    • ↵a Values are presented as means. Volumetric measurements are presented in milliliters. Groups were compared using the χ2 test and Student t test.

    • ↵b Degenerative disease group (n = 10) included patients with Parkinson disease (n = 6), epilepsy (n = 2), cerebellum syndrome (n = 1), and dementia (n = 1); autoimmune disease group (n = 10) included patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 4), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 3), neurosarcoidosis (n = 1), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 1), and chronic fatigue syndrome (n = 1); neurovascular disease group (n = 10) included patients with migraine (n = 7), transitory ischemic attack (n = 1), headache (n = 1), and CNS vasculitis (n = 1).

    • ↵c P value of OND vs HC.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Location of white matter signal abnormalities visible on SWI-filtered phase, T2WI, and their overlaps between patients with clinically isolated syndrome, other neurologic disorders, and healthy controlsa

    CIS (n = 48)HC (n = 47)OND (n = 30)PP
    (No.) (%)Mean (SD) Median(No.) (%)Mean (SD) Median(No.) (%)Mean (SD) MedianCIS vs HCCIS vs OND
    Phase WM-SA
        Total186 (100)3.88 (5.18) 219 (100)0.4 (0.85) 025 (100).83 (2.15) 0.001.0001
        Periventricular132 (71)2.75 (3.26) 216 (84.2)0.34 (0.7) 014 (56).47 (1.22) 0.001.0001
        Juxtacortical15 (8)0.31 (0.55) 00 (0)0 (0) 04 (16).13 (.43) 0.001.137
        Infratentorial0 (0)0 (0) 00 (0)0 (0) 00 (0)0 (0) 011
        Deep WM39 (21)0.81 (1.99) 03 (15.8)0.06 (0.24) 07 (28).23 (.68) 0.012.232
    T2 WM-SA
        Total770 (100)16.04 (14.27) 10.546 (100).98 (2.3) 0243 (100)8.1 (11.99) 4.5.001.0001
        Periventricular403 (52)8.4 (5.68) 7.54 (9).09 (.28) 0138 (57)4.60 (4.92) 3.001.0001
        Juxtacortical53 (7)1.10 (1.65) 15 (11).11 (.43) 015 (6).50 (1.28) 0.001.016
        Infratentorial14 (2)0.29 (0.68) 000 (0) 01 (0).03 (.18) 0.005.083
        Deep WM300 (39)6.25 (8.66) 2.537 (80).79 (2.1) 089 (37)2.97 (6.63) 0.001.010
    Overlap
        Total92 (100)1.92 (2.97) 10 (0) 00 (0) 012 (100).40 (1.4) 0.001.0001
        Periventricular70 (76)1.46 (2.21) 10 (0) 00 (0) 05 (42).17 (.53) 0.001.0001
        Juxtacortical4 (4)0.08 (0.28) 00 (0) 00 (0) 03 (25).10 (.40) 0.082.918
        Infratentorial0 (0)0 (0) 00 (0) 00 (0) 00 (0)0 (0) 011
        Deep WM18 (20)0.38 (1.06) 00 (0) 00 (0) 04 (33).13 (.51) 0.005.245
    • ↵a WM signal abnormality numbers were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values have been corrected for false discovery rate at the P < .05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Sensitivity and specificity for the presence of SWI-filtered phase, T2, and their overlapping white matter signal abnormalities among patients with clinically isolated syndrome, other neurologic disorders, and age- and sex-matched healthy controlsa

    CIS vs HCCIS vs OND
    SensitivitySpecificityAccuracySensitivitySpecificityAccuracy
    Phase WM-SA
        Total70.876.673.7b70.876.773.1b
        Periventricular66.776.671.6b66.78071.8b
        Juxtacortical27.110063.2b27.19051.3
        Infratentorial0100–0100–
        Deep WM27.193.860c27.186.750
    T2 WM-SA
        Total93.968.881.4b95.813.364.1
        Periventricular93.891.592.6b93.813.362.8
        Juxtacortical52.193.672.6b52.183.364.1c
        Infratentorial18.810058.9c18.896.748.7
        Deep WM81.374.577.9b81.353.370.5
    Overlapping
        Total55.110077.3b56.39069.2b
        Periventricular54.210076.8b54.29067.9b
        Juxtacortical8.310053.7b8.393.341
        Infratentorial0100–0100–
        Deep WM18.810059c18.893.347.4
    • Note:— indicates not applicable.

    • ↵a Sensitivity and specificity were computed using cross-tabulations.

    • ↵b P < .001.

    • ↵c P < .01. P values have been corrected for false discovery rate at the P < .05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Sensitivity and specificity for the presence of multiple SWI-filtered phase signal abnormalities and fulfillment of the McDonald 200530 and 20107 criteria for dissemination in space between patients with clinically isolated syndrome and other neurologic disordersa

    CIS vs. OND
    SensitivitySpecificityAccuracy
    ≥2 Phase WM-SAs56.383.366.7b
    ≥3 Phase WM-SAs43.89061.5c
    ≥4 Phase WM-SAs43.893.362.8b
    McDonald 2005 criteria for DIS52.18062.8c
    McDonald 2010 criteria for DIS62.576.767.9c
    ≥2 Phase + McDonald 2005 criteria for DIS33.39055.1
    ≥2 Phase + McDonald 2010 criteria for DIS39.69058.9c
    • Note:— P < .05. P values have been corrected for false discovery rate at the P < .05 level.

    • ↵a Sensitivity and specificity were computed using cross-tabulations.

    • ↵b P < .001.

    • ↵c P < .01.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phase White Matter Signal Abnormalities in Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Other Neurologic Disorders
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J. Hagemeier, M. Heininen-Brown, T. Gabelic, T. Guttuso, N. Silvestri, D. Lichter, L.E. Fugoso, N. Bergsland, E. Carl, J.J.G. Geurts, B. Weinstock-Guttman, R. Zivadinov
Phase White Matter Signal Abnormalities in Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Other Neurologic Disorders
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2014, 35 (10) 1916-1923; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3969

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Phase White Matter Signal Abnormalities in Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Other Neurologic Disorders
J. Hagemeier, M. Heininen-Brown, T. Gabelic, T. Guttuso, N. Silvestri, D. Lichter, L.E. Fugoso, N. Bergsland, E. Carl, J.J.G. Geurts, B. Weinstock-Guttman, R. Zivadinov
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2014, 35 (10) 1916-1923; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3969
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MRI phase changes in multiple sclerosis vs neuromyelitis optica lesions at 7T
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire