Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Review ArticleReview Articles
Open Access

Spinal Fluid Biomechanics and Imaging: An Update for Neuroradiologists

V. Haughton and K.-A. Mardal
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2014, 35 (10) 1864-1869; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4023
V. Haughton
aFrom the Department of Radiology (V.H.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.-A. Mardal
bCenter for Biological Computing (K.-A.M.), Simula, Lysaker, Norway.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Plot of CSF velocity through the cardiac cycle (blue) and for comparison a sinusoid (red). CSF flow has greater velocity in the positive direction (systolic flow) than in the negative direction (diastolic flow). Systolic flow has shorter duration than diastolic flow. Flow volume in the 2 directions is equal.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A 3D representation of CSF velocities in an idealized model of the posterior fossa and spinal canal of a patient with Chiari I. It displays the subarachnoid space posteriorly. It shows the direction and magnitude of flow throughout the space at one moment in the cardiac cycle by the direction and length of arrows. Flow velocities and flow directions vary from one region to another. The flow is more rapid at the cervical spine below the tonsils than at the craniovertebral junction. Flow predominates in the long axis of the model but has evidence of vortices in some areas.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Four consecutive PCMR images of the 14 images obtained during one cardiac cycle in the upper cervical spine demonstrating flow in the subarachnoid space and in cervical arteries and veins. The first image shows flow anterior and posterior to the spinal cord has a positive sign (caudad direction). The second image shows flow anterolateral to the cord remains positive whereas flow in the midline anterior to the cord has a negative sign (cephalad). The third image shows more voxels with cephalad flow and fewer with caudad flow. The fourth image shows predominantly cephalad flow with little caudad flow detected. The 2 vessels anterolateral to the subarachnoid space have caudad flow in each of the 4 images.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Sagittal T2-weighted MR image and coronal slab obtained with 4D PCMR acquisition method. The streamlines in PCMR image shows some flow along the spinal axis and some flow in vortices. Reproduced with permission from: Bunck AC, Kröger JR, Jüttner A, et al. Magnetic resonance 4D flow characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid at the craniocervical junction and the cervical spinal canal. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1788–96.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Computer graphic from a flow simulation showing flow along the spinal axis by red-blue-green color coding and in-plane flow by arrows in which velocity is coded by the dimensions of the arrows. Longitudinal flow predominates anterolateral to the cord (top of image) and in-plane flow predominates in a posterior direction. Modified from Roldan et al.7

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    PCMR images in sagittal (upper row) and axial (lower row) views showing flow in one systolic and one diastolic phase of the cycle and for reference (top left) the sagittal T2-weighted image in the patient. These demonstrate more flow anterior to the cord than posterior. On careful inspection, the axial images show more flow anterolateral to the cord than posterior to it. Reproduced with permission from Hofkes SK, Iskandar BJ, Turski PA, et al. Differentiation between symptomatic Chiari I malformation and asymptomatic tonsilar ectopia by using cerebrospinal fluid flow imaging: initial estimate of imaging accuracy. Radiology 2007;245:532–40.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    Graphic illustrating simulated flow in a patient-specific model of the subarachnoid space to illustrate the inhomogeneity of CSF flow. Flow velocity, in red-blue-green color coding, shows the greatest velocities anterolateral to the spinal cord. Modified from Rutkowska et al.9

  • Fig 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8.

    PCMR images of diastolic flow (left column) and systolic flow (right column) in successively lower levels of the upper cervical spinal canal in a patient with Chiari I. CSF velocities increase from region 1 near the tonsils to region 4 near the C4 level. At C4, aliasing produces negative flow voxels (black) scattered among the voxels with positive flow (white voxels). Modified from Shah et al.8

  • Fig 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 9.

    Sagittal T2-weighted image in a patient with a Chiari I malformation and graphic showing simulated flow velocities in the same patient by sagittal and multiple axial sections. The flow simulations show inhomogeneous flow patterns, greatest flow anterolateral to the cord, and increasing velocities between C1 and C4. Reproduced from Rutkowska et al.9

  • Fig 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 10.

    Graphic showing pressure gradients along the cervical spinal canal at 4 phases of the cardiac cycle. Pressure is coded by the red-blue-green scale. At one phase, pressure decreases from C1 to C7; at one phase it increases from C1 to C7, and at 2 phases in the cycle, no gradient is present. The pressure oscillates between these pressure patterns during the cycle. Velocities peak approximately 90° out of phase with the pressure in healthy adults. Modified from Roldan et al.7

  • Fig 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 11.

    Plot of relative pressure against position from the midposterior fossa to the C3/4 level in 5 computational models: an idealized healthy model, an idealized patient with Chiari I, and 3 models showing the Chiari model with various amounts of craniovertebral decompression. At this phase of the cycle, pressure decreases from posterior fossa to C3/4. The gradients are steepest in the Chiari I model and least steep in the healthy model. The 3 degrees of craniovertebral decompression appear to lower pressures in the foramen magnum and to normalize pressures at the C3/4 level.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spinal Fluid Biomechanics and Imaging: An Update for Neuroradiologists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
V. Haughton, K.-A. Mardal
Spinal Fluid Biomechanics and Imaging: An Update for Neuroradiologists
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2014, 35 (10) 1864-1869; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Spinal Fluid Biomechanics and Imaging: An Update for Neuroradiologists
V. Haughton, K.-A. Mardal
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2014, 35 (10) 1864-1869; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4023
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Conclusions
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • CSF Flow and Spinal Cord Motion in Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Phase Contrast MRI Study
  • MRI T2-Hyperintense Signal Structures in the Cervical Spinal Cord: Anterior Median Fissure versus Central Canal in Chiari and Control--An Exploratory Pilot Analysis
  • Subject-Specific Studies of CSF Bulk Flow Patterns in the Spinal Canal: Implications for the Dispersion of Solute Particles in Intrathecal Drug Delivery
  • Hydraulic resistance of perivascular spaces in the brain
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • An Atlas of Neonatal Neurovascular Imaging Anatomy as Depicted with Microvascular Imaging: The Intracranial Arteries
  • An Atlas of Neonatal Neurovascular Imaging Anatomy as Depicted with Microvascular Imaging: The Intracranial Veins
  • Clinical Translation of Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Probes for Glioma Imaging
Show more Review Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire