Comparative Effectiveness of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Therapies: Propensity Score Analysis of Clipping versus Coiling

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al

   . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Nichols DA,
   2. Brown RD Jr.,
   3. Meyer FB

   . Coils or clips in subarachnoid haemorrhage? Lancet 2002;360:1262–63

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Klompenhouwer EG,
   2. Dings JT,
   3. van Oostenbrugge RJ,
   4. et al

   . Single-center experience of surgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:570–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Qureshi AI,
   2. Vazquez G,
   3. Tariq N,
   4. et al

   . Impact of international subarachnoid aneurysm trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. J Neurosurg 2011;114:834–41

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. O'Kelly CJ,
   2. Kulkarni AV,
   3. Austin PC,
   4. et al

   . The impact of therapeutic modality on outcomes following repair of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: an administrative data analysis. J Neurosurg 2010;113:795–801

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Gnanalingham KK,
   2. Apostolopoulos V,
   3. Barazi S,
   4. et al

   . The impact of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) on the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in a neurosurgical unit in the UK. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006;108:117–23

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Dumont AS,
   2. Crowley RW,
   3. Monteith SJ,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment or neurosurgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: effect on angiographic vasospasm, delayed ischemic neurological deficit, cerebral infarction, and clinical outcome. Stroke 2010;41:2519–24

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Hoh BL,
   2. Chi YY,
   3. Lawson MF,
   4. et al

   . Length of stay and total hospital charges of clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured adult cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2002 to 2006. Stroke 2010;41:337–42

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Cowan JA Jr.,
    2. Ziewacz J,
    3. Dimick JB,
    4. et al

    . Use of endovascular coil embolization and surgical clip occlusion for cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2007;107:530–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    Premier Research Services. Premier Perspective Database. Charlotte, North Carolina: 2012
12. 12.↵
    1. Ho DE,
    2. Imai K,
    3. King G,
    4. et al

    . MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference. 2011. http://gking.harvard.edu/matchit. Accessed June 11, 2013.
13. 13.↵
    1. McDonald RJ,
    2. McDonald JS,
    3. Bida JP,
    4. et al

    . Intravenous contrast induced nephropathy: causal or coincident phenomenon? Radiology 2013;267:106–18

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Quan H,
    2. Sundararajan V,
    3. Halfon P,
    4. et al

    . Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Lin DY,
    2. Psaty BM,
    3. Kronmal RA

    . Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics 1998;54:948–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Taki W,
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Suzuki H

    . Determinants of poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage when both clipping and coiling are available: Prospective Registry of Subarachnoid Aneurysms Treatment (PRESAT) in Japan. World Neurosurg 2011;76:437–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Leake CB,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. et al

    . Increasing treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms at high-volume centers in the United States. J Neurosurg 2011;115:1179–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Coley S,
    2. Sneade M,
    3. Clarke A,
    4. et al

    . Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Zabramski JM,
    4. et al

    . The Barrow ruptured aneurysm trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Berthelsen CL

    . Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample. Top Health Inf Manage 2000;21:10–23

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Langham J,
    4. et al

    . Applicability of coiling for subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 2005;366:1924

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Birks J,
    4. et al

    . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al

    . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the cerebral aneurysm rerupture after treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text