The Scientific Method: A Need for Something Better?

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research—Conflicts of Interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, http://www.icmje.org/ethical_4conflicts.html. Accessed October 2, 2012
2. 2.↵
   1. Halwes T

   . The Myth of the Magical Scientific Method. http://dharma-haven.org/science/myth-of-scientific-method.htm. Accessed October 2, 2012
3. 3.↵
   1. Conn JH

   . The decline of psychoanalysis: the end of an era, or here we go again. JAMA 1974;228:711–12

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Fulford KW,
   2. Stanghellini G,
   3. Broome M

   . What can philosophy do for psychiatry? World Psychiatry 2004;3:130–35

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   EITM. Empirical implications of theoretical models. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/ses/polisci/reports/pdf/eitmreport.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2012
6. 6.↵
   1. Clarke KA,
   2. Primo DM

   . Overcoming the ‘physics envy.’ http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/opinion/sunday/the-social-sciences-physics-envy.html. Accessed October 2, 2012
7. 7.↵
   1. Windschitl M,
   2. Thompson J,
   3. Braaten M

   . Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education 2008;92:941–67

   CrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Musante S

   . A dynamic alternative to the scientific method: AIBS eye on education. http://www.aibs.org/eye-on-education/eye_on_education_2009_01.html. Accessed October 2, 2012
9. 9.↵
   Understanding science. How science really works. http://undsci.berkeley.edu. Accessed October 2, 2012