Motion-Compensation Techniques in Neonatal and Fetal MR Imaging

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Rutherford MA

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:180–86

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Rutherford M,
   2. Malamateniou C,
   3. Zeka J,
   4. et al

   . MR imaging of the neonatal brain at 3 Tesla. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2004;8:281–89

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Levine D,
   2. Hatabu H,
   3. Gaa J,
   4. et al

   . Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:905–08

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Levine D,
   2. Barnes PD,
   3. Sher S,
   4. et al

   . Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998;206:549–54

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Griffiths PD,
   2. Paley MN,
   3. Whitby EH

   . MR imaging of the fetal brain and spine: a maturing technology. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2003;32:483–89

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Prayer D

   . Fetal MR. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:171

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Huppi PS,
   2. Inder TE

   . Magnetic resonance techniques in the evaluation of the perinatal brain: recent advances and future directions. Semin Neonatol 2001;6:195–210

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Higgins RD,
   2. Raju T,
   3. Edwards AD,
   4. et al

   . Hypothermia and other treatment options for neonatal encephalopathy: an executive summary of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD workshop. J Pediatr 2011;159:851–58, e851

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Edwards AD,
   2. Azzopardi D,
   3. Rutherford MA

   . Evaluation of MR imaging to predict neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants (e-prime). National Institute for Health Research Annual Report 2009 (http://www.nihr.ac.uk/files/pdfs/400891_NIHR_AnnualReport2010−acc3.pdf). Accessed September 14, 2011
10. 10.↵
    1. Levine D

    . Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in fetal evaluation. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:25–38

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Frates MC,
    2. Kumar AJ,
    3. Benson CB,
    4. et al

    . Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis. Radiology 2004;232:398–404

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Whitby EH,
    2. Paley MN,
    3. Sprigg A,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG 2004;111:784–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Hill DL,
    2. Batchelor PG,
    3. Holden M,
    4. et al

    . Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:R1–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Bonel H,
    2. Frei KA,
    3. Raio L,
    4. et al

    . Prospective navigator-echo-based real-time triggering of fetal head movement for the reduction of artifacts. Eur Radiol 2008;18:822–29

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Hayat TT,
    2. Nihat A,
    3. Martinez-Biarge M,
    4. et al

    . Optimization and initial experience of a multisection balanced steady-state free precession cine sequence for the assessment of fetal behavior in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:331–38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Limperopoulos C,
    2. Clouchoux C

    . Advancing fetal brain MRI: targets for the future. Semin Perinatol 2009;33:289–98

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Rutherford M,
    2. Jiang S,
    3. Allsop J,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging methods for assessing fetal brain development. Dev Neurobiol 2008;68:700–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Hayat T

    . Morphological and Functional Analysis of the Fetal Central Nervous System using Magnetic Resonance Imaging [thesis]. London, UK: Imaging Sciences Department, Imperial College; 2010
19. 19.↵
    1. Dantendorfer K,
    2. Amering M,
    3. Bankier A,
    4. et al

    . A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:301–06

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. de Vries JI,
    2. Fong BF

    . Changes in fetal motility as a result of congenital disorders: an overview. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29:590–99

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Glenn OA,
    2. Barkovich J

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis: part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1807–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Vertinsky AT,
    2. Rubesova E,
    3. Krasnokutsky MV,
    4. et al

    . Performance of PROPELLER relative to standard FSE T2-weighted imaging in pediatric brain MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:1038–47

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Chow LC

    . Motion correction for pediatric and MSK MRI. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on Current Concepts of Motion Correction for MRI & MRS, Kitzbuhel, Tyrol, Austria. February 24–28, 2010
24. 24.↵
    1. Arena L,
    2. Morehouse HT,
    3. Safir J

    . MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them. Radiographics 1995;15:1373–94

    PubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Pipe J

    . The impact of motion on data consistency and image quality in MRI. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on Current Concepts of Motion Correction for MRI & MRS. Kitzbuhel, Tyrol, Austria. February 24–28, 2010
26. 26.↵
    1. Atkinson D

    . Motion compensation strategies. In: Proceeding of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Montreal, Canada. May 6–13, 2011
27. 27.↵
    1. Maclaren JR

    . Motion Detection and Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging [thesis]. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury; 2008
28. 28.↵
    1. Schultz CL,
    2. Alfidi RJ,
    3. Nelson AD,
    4. et al

    . The effect of motion on two-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance images. Radiology 1984;152:117–21

    PubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Li T,
    2. Mirowitz SA

    . Fast T2-weighted MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:745–53

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Bailes DR,
    2. Gilderdale DJ,
    3. Bydder GM,
    4. et al

    . Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacta in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:835–38

    PubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Patrick JL

    . Reducing motion artifacts in two-dimensional Fourier transform imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1986;4:359–76

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Jhooti P,
    2. Wiesmann F,
    3. Taylor AM,
    4. et al

    . Hybrid ordered phase encoding (HOPE): an improved approach for respiratory artifact reduction. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:968–80

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Lanzer P,
    2. Barta C,
    3. Botvinick EH,
    4. et al

    . ECG-synchronized cardiac MR imaging: method and evaluation. Radiology 1985;155:681–86

    PubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Bernstein M,
    2. King K,
    3. Zhou X

    . Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004
35. 35.↵
    1. Chernish SM,
    2. Maglinte DD

    . Glucagon: common untoward reactions–review and recommendations. Radiology 1990; 177:145–46

    PubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Edwards AD,
    2. Arthurs OJ

    . Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:1353–64

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Whitwam JG,
    2. McCloy RF

    1. Cowan FM

    . Sedation for magnetic sedation for magnetic resonance scanning of infants and young children. In: Whitwam JG, McCloy RF, eds. Principles and Practice of Sedation, 2nd ed. London, UK: Blackwell Healthcare; 1998:206–13
38. 38.↵
    1. Bluemke DA,
    2. Breiter SN

    . Sedation procedures in MR imaging: safety, effectiveness, and nursing effect on examinations. Radiology 2000;216:645–52

    PubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Bisset GS,
    2. Ball WS

    . Preparation, sedation, and monitoring of the pediatric patient in the magnetic resonance suite. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1991;12:376–78

    PubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Rutherford MA

    . MRI of the Neonatal Brain. London: WB Saunders; 2002:17–21
41. 41.↵
    1. Merchant N,
    2. Groves A,
    3. Larkman DJ,
    4. et al

    . A patient care system for early 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:779–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Hennig J,
    2. Nauerth A,
    3. Friedburg H

    . RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:823–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Mansfield P

    . Multi-planar image-formation using NMR spin echoes. J Phys C Solid State Phys 1977;10:L55–58

    CrossRef
44. 44.↵
    1. Jiang S,
    2. Xue H,
    3. Glover A,
    4. et al

    . MRI of moving subjects using multislice snapshot images with volume reconstruction (SVR): application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:967–80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Chen Q,
    2. Levine D

    . Fast fetal magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:67–79

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Frahm J,
    2. Haase A,
    3. Matthaei D

    . Rapid NMR imaging of dynamic processes using the FLASH technique. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:321–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Nitz WR

    . Fast and ultrafast non-echo-planar MR imaging techniques. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2866–82

    PubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    1. Malamateniou C,
    2. McGuinness AK,
    3. Allsop JM,
    4. et al

    . Snapshot inversion recovery: an optimized single-shot T1-weighted inversion-recovery sequence for improved fetal brain anatomic delineation. Radiology 2011;258:229–35

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Graumann R,
    2. Fischer H,
    3. Oppelt A

    . A new pulse sequence for determining T1 and T2 simultaneously. Med Phys 1986;13:644–47

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Duerk JL,
    2. Lewin JS,
    3. Wendt M,
    4. et al

    . Remember true FISP? A high SNR, near 1-second imaging method for T2-like contrast in interventional MRI at. 2 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:203–08

    PubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Sodickson DK,
    2. Manning WJ

    . Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591–603

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    1. Pruessmann KP,
    2. Weiger M,
    3. Scheidegger MB,
    4. et al

    . SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Margosian P,
    2. Schmitt F,
    3. Purdy D

    . Faster MR imaging: imaging with half the data. Health Care Instrum 1986:37;93–102
54. 54.↵
    1. McRobbie D,
    2. Moore E,
    3. Graves M,
    4. et al

    . MRI from Picture to Proton. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006
55. 55.↵
    1. Hennig J

    . K-space sampling strategies. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1020–31

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Pipe JG

    . Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:963–69

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Larkman DJ,
    2. Atkinson D,
    3. Hajnal JV

    . Artifact reduction using parallel imaging methods. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:267–75

    CrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    1. Delfaut EM,
    2. Beltran J,
    3. Johnson G,
    4. et al

    . Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 1999;19:373–82

    PubMedWeb of Science
59. 59.↵
    1. Stadler A,
    2. Schima W,
    3. Ba-Ssalamah A,
    4. et al

    . Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1242–55

    CrossRefPubMed
60. 60.↵
    1. Speck O

    . Prospective motion correction. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on Current Concepts of Motion Correction for MRI & MRS. Kitzbuhel, Tyrol, Austria. February 24–28, 2010
61. 61.↵
    1. Ehman RL,
    2. Felmlee JP

    . Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. Radiology 1989;173:255–63

    PubMedWeb of Science
62. 62.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Riederer SJ,
    3. Ehman RL

    . Respiratory motion of the heart: kinematics and the implications for the spatial resolution in coronary imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:713–19

    PubMedWeb of Science
63. 63.↵
    1. Fu ZW,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Grimm RC,
    4. et al

    . Orbital navigator echoes for motion measurements in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:746–53

    PubMed
64. 64.↵
    1. Welch EB,
    2. Manduca A,
    3. Grimm RC,
    4. et al

    . Spherical navigator echoes for full 3D rigid body motion measurement in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:32–41

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    1. van der Kouwe AJ,
    2. Benner T,
    3. Dale AM

    . Real-time rigid body motion correction and shimming using cloverleaf navigators. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:1019–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
66. 66.↵
    1. Klessen C,
    2. Asbach P,
    3. Kroencke TJ,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:576–82

    CrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    1. Barnwell JD,
    2. Smith JK,
    3. Castillo M

    . Utility of navigator-prospective acquisition correction technique (PACE) for reducing motion in brain MR imaging studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:790–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
68. 68.↵
    1. Glover GH,
    2. Pauly JM

    . Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:275–89

    PubMed
69. 69.↵
    1. Forbes KP,
    2. Pipe JG,
    3. Karis JP,
    4. et al

    . Brain imaging in the unsedated pediatric patient: comparison of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:794–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
70. 70.↵
    1. Zaitsev M,
    2. Dold C,
    3. Sakas G,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. Neuroimage 2006;31:1038–50

    CrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    1. White N,
    2. Roddey C,
    3. Shankaranarayanan A,
    4. et al

    . PROMO: real-time prospective motion correction in MRI using image-based tracking. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:91–105

    CrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    1. Brown TT,
    2. Kuperman JM,
    3. Erhart M,
    4. et al

    . Prospective motion correction of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data in children. Neuroimage 2010;53:139–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
73. 73.↵
    1. Kuperman JM,
    2. Brown TT,
    3. Ahmadi ME,
    4. et al

    . Prospective motion correction improves diagnostic utility of pediatric MRI scans. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:1578–82.

    CrossRefPubMed
74. 74.↵
    1. Hedley M,
    2. Yan H

    . Motion artifact suppression: a review of post-processing techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:627–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
75. 75.↵
    1. Rousseau F,
    2. Glenn OA,
    3. Iordanova B,
    4. et al

    . Registration-based approach for reconstruction of high-resolution in utero fetal MR brain images. Acad Radiol 2006;13:1072–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
76. 76.↵
    1. Gholipour A,
    2. Estroff JA,
    3. Warfield SK

    . Robust super-resolution volume reconstruction from slice acquisitions: application to fetal brain MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1739–58

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
77. 77.↵
    1. Lustig M,
    2. Donoho D,
    3. Pauly JM

    . Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
78. 78.↵
    1. Vasanawala SS,
    2. Alley MT,
    3. Hargreaves BA,
    4. et al

    . Improved pediatric MR imaging with compressed sensing. Radiology 2010;256:607–16

    CrossRefPubMed
79. 79.↵
    1. Malamateniou C,
    2. Counsell SJ,
    3. Allsop JM,
    4. et al

    . The effect of preterm birth on neonatal cerebral vasculature studied with magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla. Neuroimage 2006;32:1050–59

    CrossRefPubMed