Article Figures & Data
Tables
Recently completed and ongoing intracranial aneurysm RCTsa
Trial Comparison Simple or Composite “Recurrence” as Angiographic Outcome Recurrence Scale “Other” Angiographic Primary Outcome Retreatment as Primary Outcome Duration for Primary Outcome (mo) HELPS1 HydroCoilb versus bare platinum coil Composite Yes Major/minor Raymond NA No 18 MAPS5 Matrix Coilc versus bare platinum coil Composite No NA NA Yes 12 CCT2–4 Cerecyte Coil versus bare platinum coil Simple No NA Angiographic occlusion, improvement, or no change No 6 Efficacy Trial of Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Using 2 Different Endovascular Techniques Coils versus Silkd artery reconstruction device Simple No NA NA No 12 Hydrogel Coil Versus Bare Platinum Coil in Recanalization Imaging Data Study HydroCoil versus bare platinum coil Simple Yes NA NA No 12 Flow Diversion in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Flow diversion versus best standard treatment Composite No NA NA No 12 The Canadian Unruptured Endovascular Versus Surgery Trial Endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping Composite Yes NA NA No 12 HydroCoil Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Trial HydroCoil versus bare platinum coil Simple Yes NA Angiographic occlusion, improvement, or no change No 12–18 Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial HydroCoil versus bare platinum coil Simple Yes Raymond scale or Meyers Scale NA No 24 Patients Prone to Recurrence After Endovascular Treatment HydroCoil versus bare platinum coil Simple Yes NA NA No 18 -
Note:—NA indicates not applicable.
-
↵a Data were obtained from www.clinicaltrials.gov using search terms “aneurysm” and “intracranial aneurysm.”
-
↵b MicroVention Terumo, Aliso Viejo, California.
-
↵c Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts.
-
↵d Balt, Montmorency, France.
-
