Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Does Higher Gadolinium Concentration Play a Role in the Morphologic Assessment of Brain Tumors? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine (the MERIT Study)

Z. Seidl, J. Vymazal, M. Mechl, M. Goyal, M. Herman, C. Colosimo, M. Pasowicz, R. Yeung, B. Paraniak-Gieszczyk, B. Yemen, N. Anzalone, A. Citterio, G. Schneider, S. Bastianello and J. Ruscalleda
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2012, 33 (6) 1050-1058; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3033
Z. Seidl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Vymazal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Mechl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Goyal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Herman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Colosimo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Pasowicz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Yeung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Paraniak-Gieszczyk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Yemen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Anzalone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Citterio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Schneider
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Bastianello
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Ruscalleda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Colosimo C,
    2. Ruscalleda J,
    3. Korves M,
    4. et al
    . Detection of intracranial metastases: a multi-center, intra-patient comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI with routinely used contrast agents at equal dose. Invest Radiol 2001;36:72–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Knopp MV,
    2. Runge VM,
    3. Essig M,
    4. et al
    . Primary and secondary brain tumors at MR imaging: bicentric intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 2004;230:55–64
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Colosimo C,
    2. Knopp MV,
    3. Barreau X,
    4. et al
    . A comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA for contrast-enhanced MRI of intracranial tumours. Neuroradiology 2004;46:655–65
    PubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Essig M,
    2. Tartaro A,
    3. Tartaglione T,
    4. et al
    . Enhancing lesions of the brain: intra-individual crossover comparison of contrast enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine versus established gadolinium comparators. Acad Radiol 2006;13:744–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Maravilla KR,
    2. Maldjian JA,
    3. Schmalfuss IM,
    4. et al
    . Contrast enhancement of central nervous system lesions: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparative study of two MR contrast agents. Radiology 2006;240:389–400
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kuhn MJ,
    2. Picozzi P,
    3. Maldjian JA,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of intraaxial enhancing brain tumors on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for visualization and assessment, and implications for surgical intervention. J Neurosurg 2007;106:557–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rowley HA,
    2. Scialfa G,
    3. Gao PY,
    4. et al
    . Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of brain lesions: a large-scale intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadodiamide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1684–91
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Rumboldt Z,
    2. Rowley HA,
    3. Steinberg F,
    4. et al
    . Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine in MRI of brain tumors at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:760–67
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    MultiHance. Summary of product characteristics. http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/6132/SPC/multihance/#INDICATIONS. Accessed February 3, 2011
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pintaske J,
    2. Martirosian P,
    3. Graf H,
    4. et al
    . Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Gadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41:213–21. Erratum in Invest Radiol 2006;41:859
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rohrer M,
    2. Bauer H,
    3. Mintorovitch J,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 2005;40:715–24
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Cavagna FM,
    2. Maggioni F,
    3. Castelli PM,
    4. et al
    . Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins: a new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1997;32:780–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. von Tengg-Kobligk H,
    3. Wilkinson ID,
    4. et al
    . Influence of human serum albumin on longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates (R1 and R2) of magnetic resonance contrast agents. Invest Radiol 2006;41:222–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Gadavist (gadobutrol) injection. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; March 2011. http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?id=40544. Accessed February 3, 2012
  15. 15.↵
    1. Anzalone N,
    2. Gerevini S,
    3. Scotti R,
    4. et al
    . Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Acta Radiol 2009;50:933–40
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kim ES,
    2. Chang JH,
    3. Choi HS,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic yield of double-dose gadobutrol in the detection of brain metastasis: intraindividual comparison with double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1055–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Katakami N,
    2. Inaba Y,
    3. Sugata S,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance evaluation of brain metastases from systemic malignances with two doses of gadobutrol 1.0 m compared with gadoteridol: a multicenter, phase II/III study in patients with known or suspected brain metastases. Invest Radiol 2011; 46:411–18
  18. 18.↵
    1. Fleiss JL
    . Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1981
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kirchin MA,
    2. Runge VM
    . Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: safety update. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003;14:426–35
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Laurent S,
    2. Elst LV,
    3. Muller RN
    . Comparative study of the physicochemical properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2006;1:128–37
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Yuh WT,
    2. Fisher DJ,
    3. Engelken JD,
    4. et al
    . MR evaluation of CNS tumors: dose comparison study with gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol. Radiology 1991;180:485–91
    PubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Schneider G,
    2. Kirchin MA,
    3. Pirovano G,
    4. et al
    . Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial metastases: effect of dose on lesion detection and delineation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:525–39
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wollanka H,
    2. Weidenmaier W,
    3. Giersig C
    . NSF after Gadovist exposure: a case report and hypothesis of NSF development. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:3882–84. Epub 2009 Sep 19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Elmholdt TR,
    2. Jørgensen B,
    3. Ramsing M,
    4. et al
    . Two cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after exposure to the macrocyclic compound gadobutrol. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;3:285–87
  25. 25.↵
    1. Anzalone N
    . Comparative studies of different gadolinium agents in brain tumors: differences between gadolinium chelates and their possible influence on imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:981–82
    FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Achenbach M,
    2. Figiel JH,
    3. Burbelko M,
    4. et al
    . Prospective comparison of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 0.5 molar gadobenate dimeglumine and 1.0 molar gadobutrol in contrast-enhanced run-off magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:1166–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Grazioli L,
    2. Morana G,
    3. Kirchin MA,
    4. et al
    . Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology 2005;236:166–77
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Morana G,
    2. Grazioli L,
    3. Kirchin MA,
    4. et al
    . Solid hypervascular liver lesions: accurate identification of true benign lesions on enhanced dynamic and hepatobiliary phase magnetic resonance imaging after gadobenate dimeglumine administration. Invest Radiol 2011;46:225–39
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. de Haën C,
    2. Cabrini M,
    3. Akhnana L,
    4. et al
    . Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5M solution for injection (MultiHance): pharmaceutical formulation and physicochemical properties of a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23(suppl 1):S161–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Banci L,
    2. Bertini I,
    3. Luchinat C
    . Nuclear and Electron Relaxation. Weinheim, Germany: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft; 1991:138
  31. 31.↵
    1. Bültmann E,
    2. Erb G,
    3. Kirchin MA,
    4. et al
    . Intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic vessels at 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008;43:695–702
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Vogler H,
    2. Platzek J,
    3. Schuhmann-Giampieri G,
    4. et al
    . Pre-clinical evaluation of gadobutrol: a new, neutral, extracellular contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 1995;21:1–10
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Tombach B,
    2. Heindel W
    . Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1550–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Gerretsen SC,
    2. le Maire TF,
    3. Miller S,
    4. et al
    . Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries. Radiology 2010;255:988–1000
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Schneider G,
    2. Pasowicz M,
    3. Vymazal J,
    4. et al
    . Gadobenate dimeglumine and gadofosveset trisodium for MR angiography of the renal arteries: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:476–85
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Martincich L,
    2. Faivre-Pierret M,
    3. Zechmann CM,
    4. et al
    . Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast MR imaging (DETECT trial). Radiology 2011;258:396–408
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Heiland S,
    2. Erb G,
    3. Ziegler S,
    4. et al
    . Where contrast agent concentration really matters: a comparison of CT and MRI. Invest Radiol 2010;45:529–37
    CrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 6
1 Jun 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does Higher Gadolinium Concentration Play a Role in the Morphologic Assessment of Brain Tumors? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine (the MERIT Study)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Z. Seidl, J. Vymazal, M. Mechl, M. Goyal, M. Herman, C. Colosimo, M. Pasowicz, R. Yeung, B. Paraniak-Gieszczyk, B. Yemen, N. Anzalone, A. Citterio, G. Schneider, S. Bastianello, J. Ruscalleda
Does Higher Gadolinium Concentration Play a Role in the Morphologic Assessment of Brain Tumors? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine (the MERIT Study)
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2012, 33 (6) 1050-1058; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Does Higher Gadolinium Concentration Play a Role in the Morphologic Assessment of Brain Tumors? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine (the MERIT Study)
Z. Seidl, J. Vymazal, M. Mechl, M. Goyal, M. Herman, C. Colosimo, M. Pasowicz, R. Yeung, B. Paraniak-Gieszczyk, B. Yemen, N. Anzalone, A. Citterio, G. Schneider, S. Bastianello, J. Ruscalleda
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2012, 33 (6) 1050-1058; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3033
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comparative Evaluation of Lower Gadolinium Doses for MR Imaging of Meningiomas: How Low Can We Go?
  • Reply:
  • The Benefits of High Relaxivity for Brain Tumor Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine with Gadoterate Meglumine (The BENEFIT Study)
  • Are There Differences between Macrocyclic Gadolinium Contrast Agents for Brain Tumor Imaging? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol with Gadoteridol (the TRUTH Study)
  • Gadolinium Contrast Agents for CNS Imaging: Current Concepts and Clinical Evidence
  • Multicenter, Intraindividual Comparison of Single-Dose Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Double-Dose Gadopentetate Dimeglumine for MR Angiography of the Supra-Aortic Arteries (the Supra-Aortic VALUE Study)
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire