Assessment of an Introductory Cervicocerebral Catheter Angiography Learning Program: A Pilot Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. DiCocco JM,
   2. Emmett KP,
   3. Fabian TC,
   4. et al

   . Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 32-channel multidetector computed tomography: more slices still don't cut it. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 444–50

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Agid R,
   2. Andersson T,
   3. Almqvist H,
   4. et al

   . Negative CT angiography findings in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: when is digital subtraction angiography still needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 696–705

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Kelliny M,
   2. Maeder P,
   3. Binaghi S,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral aneurysm exclusion by CT angiography based on subarachnoid hemorrhage pattern: a retrospective study. BMC Neurol 2011; 11: 8

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Wasserman BA,
   2. Stone JH,
   3. Hellmann DB,
   4. et al

   . Reliability of normal findings on MR imaging for excluding the diagnosis of vasculitis of the central nervous system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 455–59

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Kuker W

   . Cerebral vasculitis: imaging signs revisited. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 471–79

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Miller GE

   . The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990; 65: S63–67

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Bech B,
   2. Lonn L,
   3. Schroeder TV,
   4. et al

   . Capturing the essence of developing endovascular expertise for the construction of a global assessment instrument. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 292–302

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography: cooperative study between the ASNR, ASITN, and the SCVIR—American Society of Neuroradiology. American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 146–50

   FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Connors JJ 3rd.,
   2. Sacks D,
   3. Furlan AJ,
   4. et al

   . Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention: a joint statement from the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Radiology 2005; 234: 26–34. Epub 2004 Nov 4

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. General considerations for endovascular surgical neuroradiologic procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: S1–3

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Brehmer M,
    2. Swartz R

    . Training on bench models improves dexterity in ureteroscopy. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 458–63; discussion 63

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Wang B,
    3. Ma X,
    4. et al

    . Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for beginners without open counterpart experience: initial results under staged training. Urology 2009; 73: 1061– 65

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Murray DJ

    . Current trends in simulation training in anesthesia: a review. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 528–33. Epub 2011 Feb 1

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Yamagami T,
    2. Osuga K,
    3. Yoshimatsu R,
    4. et al

    . Development of a portable training tool for simulating visceral angiographic procedures for beginners. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32: 412–16

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Qureshi AI,
    2. Abou-Chebl A,
    3. Jovin TG

    . Qualification requirements for performing neurointerventional procedures: a Report of the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Neuroimaging 2008; 18: 433–47

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Bartlett ES,
    2. Maley JE,
    3. Fajardo LL

    . Radiology residency eCurriculum developed in-house: evaluation of benefits and weaknesses. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 657–63

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Ganguli S,
    2. Camacho M,
    3. Yam CS,
    4. et al

    . Preparing first-year radiology residents and assessing their readiness for on-call responsibilities: results over 5 years. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 539–44

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Kothary N,
    2. Ghatan CE,
    3. Hwang GL,
    4. et al

    . Renewing focus on resident education: increased responsibility and ownership in interventional radiology rotations improves the educational experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 1697–702

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. McLoud TC

    . Trends in radiologic training: national and international implications. Radiology 2010; 256: 343–7

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Friedenberg RM

    . An endangered art: teaching. Radiology 2000; 214: 317–19

    PubMed