Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

The Association between the Duration of Preoperative Pain and Pain Improvement in Vertebral Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis

A. Ehteshami Rad, M.T. Luetmer, M.H. Murad and D.F. Kallmes
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2012, 33 (2) 376-381; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2618
A. Ehteshami Rad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.T. Luetmer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.H. Murad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.F. Kallmes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alvarez L,
    2. Alcaraz M,
    3. Perez-Higueras A,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty: functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 2006; 31: 1113– 18
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Anselmetti GC,
    2. Corrao G,
    3. Monica PD,
    4. et al
    . Pain relief following percutaneous vertebroplasty: results of a series of 283 consecutive patients treated in a single institution. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30: 441– 47
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jha RM,
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Hirsch AE,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of successful palliation of compression fractures with vertebral augmentation: single-center experience of 525 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20: 760– 68
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Layton KF,
    2. Thielen KR,
    3. Koch CA,
    4. et al
    . Vertebroplasty, first 1000 levels of a single center: evaluation of the outcomes and complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 683– 89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Masala S,
    2. Mastrangeli R,
    3. Petrella MC,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty in 1,253 levels: results and long-term effectiveness in a single centre. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 165– 71
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mathis JM,
    2. Barr JD,
    3. Belkoff SM,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 373– 81
    FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. McGraw JK,
    2. Lippert JA,
    3. Minkus KD,
    4. et al
    . Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13: 883– 86
    PubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Peh WC,
    2. Gilula LA,
    3. Peck DD
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Radiology 2002; 223: 121– 26
    PubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Voormolen MH,
    2. Lohle PN,
    3. Lampmann LE,
    4. et al
    . Prospective clinical follow-up after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 1313– 20
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zoarski GH,
    2. Snow P,
    3. Olan WJ,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13: 139– 48
    PubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Barr JD,
    2. Barr MS,
    3. Lemley TJ,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 2000; 25: 923– 28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. McGraw JK,
    2. Cardella J,
    3. Barr JD,
    4. et al
    . Society of Interventional Radiology quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: S311– S315
    PubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nussbaum DA,
    2. Gailloud P,
    3. Murphy K
    . A review of complications associated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as reported to the Food and Drug Administration medical device related web site. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15: 1185– 92
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Peh WC,
    2. Gilula LA
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty: Indications, contraindications, and technique. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 69– 75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Alvarez L,
    2. Perez-Higueras A,
    3. Granizo JJ,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Spine 2005; 30: 87– 92
    PubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Erkan S,
    2. Ozalp TR,
    3. Yercan HS,
    4. et al
    . Does timing matter in performing kyphoplasty? Acute versus chronic compression fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 2009; 75: 396– 404
    PubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kaufmann TJ,
    2. Jensen ME,
    3. Schweickert PA,
    4. et al
    . Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1860– 63
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Atalay B,
    2. Caner H,
    3. Gokce C,
    4. et al
    . Kyphoplasty: 2 years of experience in a neurosurgery department. Surg Neurol 2005; 64 (suppl 2): S72– 76
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Chen LH,
    2. Niu CC,
    3. Yu SW,
    4. et al
    . Minimally invasive treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Chang Gung Med J 2004; 27: 261– 67
    PubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Diamond TH,
    2. Bryant C,
    3. Browne L,
    4. et al
    . Clinical outcomes after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a 2-year non-randomised trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 113– 17
    PubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Garfin SR,
    2. Buckley RA,
    3. Ledlie J
    . Balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures results in rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, function, and quality of life for elderly patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2213– 20
    CrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wiggins MC,
    2. Sehizadeh M,
    3. Pilgram TK,
    4. et al
    . Importance of intravertebral fracture clefts in vertebroplasty outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 634– 40
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. DerSimonian R,
    2. Laird N
    . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177– 88
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Higgins J,
    2. Thompson S,
    3. Deeks J,
    4. et al
    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557– 60
    FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Rhyne A 3rd.,
    2. Banit D,
    3. Laxer E,
    4. et al
    . Kyphoplasty: report of eighty-two thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 294– 99
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Vogl TJ,
    2. Proschek D,
    3. Schwarz W,
    4. et al
    . CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of vertebral compression fractures. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 797– 803
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hozo SP,
    2. Djulbegovic B,
    3. Hozo I
    . Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Comstock BA,
    3. Heagerty PJ,
    4. et al
    . A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 569– 79
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Kobayashi K,
    2. Shimoyama K,
    3. Nakamura K,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 360– 67
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lee SB,
    2. Cho KS,
    3. Huh PW,
    4. et al
    . Clinical and radiographic results of unilateral transpedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008; 101: 157– 60
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Liu JT,
    2. Liao WJ,
    3. Tan WC,
    4. et al
    . Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study. Osteoporos Int 2010; 21: 359– 64. Epub 2009 Jun 10
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Prather H,
    2. Van Dillen L,
    3. Metzler JP,
    4. et al
    . Prospective measurement of function and pain in patients with non-neoplastic compression fractures treated with vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 334– 41
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rapan S,
    2. Jovanovic S,
    3. Gulan G
    . Vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fracture. Coll Antropol 2009; 33: 911– 14
    PubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Rollinghoff M,
    2. Siewe J,
    3. Zarghooni K,
    4. et al
    . Effectiveness, security and height restoration on fresh compression fractures: a comparative prospective study of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52: 233– 37. Epub 2010 Jan 14fs
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Rousing R,
    2. Andersen MO,
    3. Jespersen SM,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared to conservative treatment in patients with painful acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: three-months follow-up in a clinical randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1349– 54
    CrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Schofer MD,
    2. Efe T,
    3. Timmesfeld N,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of fresh vertebral compression fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 1391– 99
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Wardlaw D,
    2. Cummings SR,
    3. Van Meirhaeghe J,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (free): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 1016– 24
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Ryu KS,
    2. Park CK
    . The prognostic factors influencing on the therapeutic effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009; 45: 16– 23. Epub 2009 Jan 31
    CrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 2
1 Feb 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Association between the Duration of Preoperative Pain and Pain Improvement in Vertebral Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Ehteshami Rad, M.T. Luetmer, M.H. Murad, D.F. Kallmes
The Association between the Duration of Preoperative Pain and Pain Improvement in Vertebral Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2012, 33 (2) 376-381; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2618

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The Association between the Duration of Preoperative Pain and Pain Improvement in Vertebral Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis
A. Ehteshami Rad, M.T. Luetmer, M.H. Murad, D.F. Kallmes
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2012, 33 (2) 376-381; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2618
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Is Severe Pain Immediately after Spinal Augmentation a Predictor of Long-Term Outcomes?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimization of Photon Counting CT Myelography
  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire