Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig 1.
Distribution of mRS for GCS ≤ 6.
- Fig 2.
Distribution of mRS for GCS > 6.
Tables
mRS ≤ 1 (n = 12) mRS > 1 (n = 28) P Value No. % No. % GCS 0.28 ≤6 6 50.0 10 35.7 >6 6 50.0 18 64.3 Time to IA intervention 0.07 ≤6 Hours 7 58.3 7 25.0 >6 Hours 5 41.7 21 75.0 Recanalization 11 91.7 22 78.6 0.65 Procedure time (mean) (min) 95.9 ± 13.0 103.5 ± 7.2 0.59 TIMI score 0.32 0 1 8.3 1 3.6 1 0 0.0 4 14.3 2 1 8.3 6 21.4 3 10 83.3 16 57.1 mRS ≤ 2 (n = 14) mRS > 2 (n = 26) P Value No. % No. % GCS .79 ≤6 6 42.9 10 38.5 >6 8 57.1 16 61.5 Time to IA intervention .01 ≤6 Hours 9 64.3 5 19.2 >6 Hours 5 35.7 21 80.8 Recanalization 13 92.9 20 76.9 .39 Procedure time (mean) (min) 94.7 ± 11.3 104.7 ± 7.5 .47 TIMI score .44 0 1 7.1 1 3.8 1 0 0.0 4 15.4 2 2 14.3 5 19.2 3 11 78.6 15 57.7 Failure of Recanalization (n = 6) Recanalization (n = 33) P Value 90-Day mortality 4 (67%) 9 (27%) .15 90-Day mRS .65 ≤1 1 (17%) 11 (33%) >1 5 (83%) 22 (67%) 90-Day mRS .391 ≤2 1 (17%) 13 (39%) >2 5 (83%) 20 (61%)
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Glasgow Coma Scale on Presentation Predicts Outcome in Endovascular Treatment for Acute Posterior Large-Vessel Occlusion
- Development of a prediction model for 1-year poor prognosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke
- Forced Arterial Suction Thrombectomy with the Penumbra Reperfusion Catheter in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Retrospective Comparison Study in 2 Korean University Hospitals
- The eye response test alone is sufficient to predict stroke outcome--reintroduction of Japan Coma Scale: a cohort study
- Technical Feasibility and Application of Mechanical Thrombectomy with the Solitaire FR Revascularization Device in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
- Endovascular therapy for acute basilar artery occlusion: a review of the literature