In Vitro Study of Near-Wall Flow in a Cerebral Aneurysm Model with and without Coils

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Dovey Z,
   2. Misra M,
   3. Thornton J,
   4. et al

   . Detachable coiling for intracranial aneurysms. Arch Neurol 2001;58:559–64

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Wiebers DO,
   2. Whisnant JP,
   3. Huston J 3rd.,
   4. et al.

   , for the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients within ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Gallas S,
   2. Pasco A,
   3. Cottier JP,
   4. et al

   . A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1723–31

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Lanzino G,
   2. Kanaan Y,
   3. Perrini P,
   4. et al

   . Emerging concepts in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: stents, coated coils, and liquid embolic agents. Neurosurgery 2005;57:449–59

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Canton G,
   2. Levy DI,
   3. Lasheras JC

   . Changes in the intraaneurysmal pressure due to HydroCoil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:904–07

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Piotin M,
   2. Mandai S,
   3. Murphy KJ,
   4. et al

   . Dense packing of cerebral aneurysms: an in vitro study with detachable platinum coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:757–60

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Boecher-Schwarz HG,
    2. Ringel K,
    3. Kopacz L,
    4. et al

    . Ex vivo study of the physical effect of coils on pressure and flow dynamics in experimental aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1532–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Goubergrits L,
    2. Petz C,
    3. Stalling D,
    4. et al

    . Experimental and numerical dye washout flow visualization. J Vis 2004;7:233–40

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Linfante I,
    2. DeLeo MJ 3rd.,
    3. Gounis MJ,
    4. et al

    . Cerecyte versus platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: packing attenuation and clinical and angiographic midterm results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1496–501. Epub 2009 Aug 20

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Imbesi SG,
    2. Kerber CW

    . Analysis of slipstream flow in a wide-necked basilar artery aneurysm: evaluation of potential treatment regimens. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:721–24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Groden C,
    2. Laudan J,
    3. Gatchell S,
    4. et al

    . Three-dimensional pulsatile flow simulation before and after endovascular coil embolization of a terminal cerebral aneurysm. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21:1464–71

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Byun HS,
    2. Rhee K

    . CFD modeling of blood flow following coil embolization of aneurysms. Med Eng Phys 2004;26:755–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Mitsos AP,
    2. Kakalis NMP,
    3. Ventikos YP,
    4. et al

    . Haemodynamic simulation of aneurysm coiling in an anatomically accurate computational fluid dynamics model: technical note. Neuroradiology 2008;50:341–47

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Sorteberg A,
    2. Sorteberg W,
    3. Aagaard BDL,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamic versus hydrodynamic effects of Guglielmi detachable coils on intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow at varying pulse rate and systemic pressure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1049–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Burgess JE,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Hassan T,
    2. Timofeev EV,
    3. Saito T,
    4. et al

    . A proposed parent vessel geometry-based categorization of saccular intracranial aneurysms: computational flow dynamics analysis of the risk factors for lesion rupture. J Neurosurg 2005;103:662–80

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Meng H,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Hoi Y,
    4. et al

    . Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke 2007;38:1924–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Debaene P,
    2. Kertzscher U,
    3. Goubergrits L,
    4. et al

    . Visualization of a wall shear flow: development of a new particle image interrogation method. J Vis 2005;8:305–13

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. Kertzscher U,
    2. Berthe A,
    3. Goubergrits L,
    4. et al

    . Particle image velocimetry of a flow at a vaulted wall. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2008;222:465–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Adrian RJ

    . Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu Rev of Fluid Mechanics 1991;23:261–68

    CrossRef
24. 24.↵
    1. Berthe A,
    2. Kondermann D,
    3. Christensen C,
    4. et al

    . Three-dimensional, three-component Wall-PIV: experiments in fluids. Experiments in Fluids 2009 (In press)
25. 25.↵
    1. Franke K,
    2. Müller K-R,
    3. Nickolay B,
    4. et al.

    1. Jehle M,
    2. Kertscher U,
    3. Jähne B

    . Direct estimation of the wall shear rate using parametric motion models in 3D. In: Franke K, Müller K-R, Nickolay B, et al., eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Pattern Recognition. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2006:434–443
26. 26.↵
    1. Goubergrits L,
    2. Weber S,
    3. Petz C,
    4. et al

    . Wall-PIV as a near wall flow validation tool for CFD: application in a pathologic vessel enlargement (aneurysm). J Vis 2009;12:241–50

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    1. Scheel P,
    2. Ruge Ch,
    3. Petruch UR,
    4. et al

    . Color duplex measurement of cerebral blood flow volume in healthy adults. Stroke 2000;31:147–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. Indo T,
    3. Yoshida E,
    4. et al

    . Contrast-enhanced 2D cine phase MR angiography for measurement of basilar artery blood flow in posterior circulation ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1346–51

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Putman CM,
    4. et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94. Epub 2008 May 7

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Steinman DA,
    2. Milner JS,
    3. Norley CJ,
    4. et al

    . Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:559–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Perry AE,
    2. Chong MS

    . A description of eddying motions and flow patterns using critical-point concepts. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1987;19:125–55

    CrossRefWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Stalling D,
    2. Hege H.-C

    . Fast and resolution independent line integral convolution. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, California, August 6–11, 1995:249–56
33. 33.↵
    1. Wakhloo AK,
    2. Gounis MJ,
    3. Sandhu JS,
    4. et al

    . Complex-shaped platinum coils for brain aneurysms: higher packing density, improved biomechanical stability, and midterm angiographic outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1395–400

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Mounayer C,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: treatment with bare platinum coils—aneurysm packing, complex coils, and angiographic recurrence. Radiology 2007;243:500–08

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Goddard JK,
    2. Moran CJ,
    3. Cross DT,
    4. et al

    . Absent relationship between the coil-embolization ratio in small aneurysms treated with a single detachable coil and outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1916–20

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Rudin S,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Kyprianou I,
    4. et al

    . Measurement of flow modification in phantom aneurysm model: comparison of coils and a longitudinally and axially asymmetric stent—initial findings. Radiology 2004;231:272–76

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. White JB,
    2. Ken CG,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. et al

    . Coils in a nutshell: a review of coil physical properties. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1242–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text