Dose Exposure of Patients Undergoing Comprehensive Stroke Imaging by Multidetector-Row CT: Comparison of 320-Detector Row and 64-Detector Row CT Scanners

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bohner G,
   2. Förschler A,
   3. Hamm B,
   4. et al

   . Quantitative perfusion imaging by multi-slice CT in stroke patients [in German]. Rofo 2003;1785:806–13
2. 2.↵
   1. Hoeffner E,
   2. Case I,
   3. Jain R,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral perfusion CT: technique and clinical applications. Radiology 2004;231:632–44. Epub 2004 Apr 29

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Roberts HC,
   2. Roberts TP,
   3. Smith WS,
   4. et al

   . Multisection dynamic CT perfusion for acute cerebral ischemia: the “toggling-table” technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1077–80

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Boone JM

   . The trouble with CTDI 100. Med Phys 2007;34:1364–71

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Kyriakou Y,
   2. Deak P,
   3. Langner O,
   4. et al

   . Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:3551–66. Epub 2008 Jun 13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Geleijns J,
   2. Salvadó Artells M,
   3. de Bruin PW,
   4. et al

   . Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:3141–59. Epub 2009 May 6

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Mori S,
   2. Endo M,
   3. Nishizawa K,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners. Br J Radiol 2006;79:56–61

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Mori S,
   2. Endo M,
   3. Nishizawa K,
   4. et al

   . Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry. Med Phys 2005;32:1061–69

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Mori S,
   2. Nishizawa K,
   3. Ohno M,
   4. et al

   . Conversion factor for CT dosimetry to assess patient dose using a 256-slice CT scanner. Br J Radiol 2006;79:888–92. Epub 2006 May 25

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1–332

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Dixon RL,
    2. Ekstrand KE

    . A film dosimetry system for use in computed tomography. Radiology 1978;127:255–58

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Shope TB,
    2. Morgan TJ,
    3. Showalter CK,
    4. et al

    . Radiation dosimetry survey of computed tomography systems from ten manufacturers. Br J Radiol 1982;55:60–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Zink FE,
    2. McCollough CH

    . The measurement of radiation dose profiles for electron beam computed tomography using film dosimetry. Med Phys 1994;21:1287–91

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. McCollough CH,
    2. Zink FE,
    3. Morn RL

    . Radiation dosimetry for electron beam CT. Radiology 1994;192:637–43

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Cademartiri F,
    2. van der Lugt A,
    3. Luccichenti G,
    4. et al

    . Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:598–607

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Siebert E,
    2. Bohner G,
    3. Dewey M,
    4. et al

    . 320-slice CT neuroimaging: initial clinical experience and image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 2009;82:561–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Klingebiel R,
    2. Siebert E,
    3. Diekmann S,
    4. et al

    . 4-D imaging in cerebrovascular disorders by using 320-slice CT: feasibility and preliminary clinical experience. Acad Radiol 2009;16:123–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Bahner ML,
    2. Bengel A,
    3. Brix G,
    4. et al

    . Improved vascular opacification in cerebral computed tomography angiography with 80 kVp. Invest Radiol 2005;40:229–34

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Cohnen M,
    2. Wittsack HJ,
    3. Assadi S,
    4. et al

    . Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1741–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Colombo P,
    2. Pedroli G,
    3. Nicoloso M,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth shield during CT examinations. Radiol Med 2004;108:560–68

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Hein E,
    2. Rogalla P,
    3. Klingebiel R,
    4. et al

    . Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses with eye lens protection: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1693–96. Epub 2002 Feb 2

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Keil B,
    2. Wulff J,
    3. Schmitt R,
    4. et al

    . Protection of eye lens in computed tomography: dose evaluation on an anthropomorphic phantom using thermo-luminescent dosimeters and Monte-Carlo simulations [in German]. Rofo 2008;180:1047–53. Epub 2008 Nov 28

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Hopper KD,
    2. Neuman JD,
    3. King SH,
    4. et al

    . Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1194–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text