Evaluation of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas with 4D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Gobin YP,
   3. Pierot L,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 1995; 194: 671–80

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Borden JA,
   2. Wu JK,
   3. Shucart WA

   . A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 1995; 82: 166–79

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Duffau H,
   2. Lopes M,
   3. Janosevic V,
   4. et al

   . Early rebleeding from intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: report of 20 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 78–84

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. van Dijk JM,
   2. terBrugge KG,
   3. Willinsky RA,
   4. et al

   . Clinical course of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with long-term persistent cortical venous reflux. Stroke 2002; 33: 1233–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. DeMarco K,
   2. Dillon WP,
   3. Halbach VV,
   4. et al

   . Dural arteriovenous fistula: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 175: 193–99

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Chen JC,
   2. Tsuruda JS,
   3. Halbach VV

   . Suspected dural arteriovenous fistula: results with screening MR angiography in seven patients. Radiology 1992; 183: 265–71

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Hirai T,
   2. Korogi Y,
   3. Hamatake S,
   4. et al

   . Three-dimensional FISP imaging in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistula: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 253–59

   Abstract
8. 8.↵
   1. Kwon BJ,
   2. Han MH,
   3. Kang HS,
   4. et al

   . MR imaging findings of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: relations with venous drainage patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2500–07

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Meckel S,
   2. Maier M,
   3. Ruiz DS,
   4. et al

   . MR angiography of dural arteriovenous fistulas: diagnosis and follow-up after treatment using a time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 877–84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Ouanounou S,
    2. Tomsick TA,
    3. Heitsman C,
    4. et al

    . Cavernous sinus and inferior petrosal sinus flow signal on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1476–81

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Paksoy Y,
    2. Genc BO,
    3. Genc E

    . Retrograde flow in the left inferior petrosal sinus and blood steal of the cavernous sinus associated with central vein stenosis: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1364–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Sakamoto M,
    2. Taoka T,
    3. Iwasaki S,
    4. et al

    . Paradoxical parasellar high signals resembling shunt diseases on routine 3D time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain: mechanism for the signals and differential diagnosis from shunt diseases. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 1289–93

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Noguchi K,
    2. Melhem ER,
    3. Kanazawa T,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 183–90

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Akiba H,
    2. Tamakawa M,
    3. Hyodoh H,
    4. et al

    . Assessment of dural arteriovenous fistulas of the cavernous sinuses on 3D dynamic MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1652–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Ziyeh S,
    2. Strecker R,
    3. Berlis A,
    4. et al

    . Dynamic 3D MR angiography of intra- and extracranial vascular malformations at 3T: a technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 630–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Hadizadeh DR,
    2. von Falkenhausen M,
    3. Gieseke J

    . Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology 2008; 246: 205–13 Epub 2007 Oct 19

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. van Vaals JJ,
    2. Brummer ME,
    3. Dixon WT,
    4. et al

    . “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 671–75

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Farb RI,
    2. McGregor C,
    3. Kim JK,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography—initial assessment. Radiology 2001; 220: 244–51

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Willinek WA,
    2. Gieseke J,
    3. Conrad R,
    4. et al

    . Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002; 225: 583–88

    PubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Taschner CA,
    2. Gieseke J,
    3. Le Thuc V,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T. Radiology 2008; 246: 871–79

    CrossRefPubMed