Evaluation of the Occlusion Status of Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms with MR Angiography at 3T: Is Contrast Enhancement Necessary?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al.

   , for the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Sluzewski M,
   2. van Rooij WJ,
   3. Rinkel GJ,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with detachable coils: long-term clinical and serial angiography results. Radiology 2003;227:720–24

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Weill A,
   3. Spelle L,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Piotin M,
   2. Spelle L,
   3. Mounayer C,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: treatment with bare platinum coils—aneurysm packing, complex coils, and angiographic recurrence. Radiology 2007;243:500–08

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Cloft HJ,
   2. Joseph GJ,
   3. Dion JE

   . Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Willinsky RA,
   2. Taylor SM,
   3. Terbrugge K,
   4. et al

   . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28. Epub 2003 Mar 13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Majoie CB,
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349–56

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Gibbs GF,
   2. Huston J,
   3. Bernstein MA,
   4. et al

   . Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:84–87

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Anzalone N,
    2. Scomazzoni F,
    3. Cirillo M,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1530–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Agid R,
    2. Willinsky RA,
    3. Lee SK,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR AM J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1570–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Gibbs GF,
    2. Huston J,
    3. Bernstein MA,
    4. et al

    . 3.0-Tesla MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:97–102

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Delcourt C,
    3. Bourquigny F,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:744–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Wikstrom J,
    2. Ronne-Enstrom E,
    3. Gal G,
    4. et al

    . Three dimensional time-of-flight (3DTOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils. Acta Radiol 2008;49:190–96

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Costalat V,
    2. Lebars E,
    3. Sarry L,
    4. et al

    . In vitro evaluation of 2D-digital subtraction angiography versus 3D-time-of-flight in assessment of intracranial cerebral aneurysm filling after endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:177–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Neugroschl C,
    3. Collignon L,
    4. et al

    . Is digital subtraction angiography still needed for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by embolisation with detachable coils? Neuroradiology 2008;50:841–48. Epub 2008 Sep 16

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Urbach H,
    2. Dorenbeck U,
    3. von Falkenhausen M,
    4. et al

    . Three dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of ruptured and coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology 2008;50:383–89

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Gauvrit JY,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Caron S,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006;37:1033–37. Epub 2006 Mar 9

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Farb RI,
    2. Nag S,
    3. Scott JN,
    4. et al

    . Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:507–15

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Kwee TC,
    2. Kwee RM

    . MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2007;49:703–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Deutschmann HA,
    2. Augustin M,
    3. Simbrunner J,
    4. et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;28:628–34
22. 22.↵
    1. Nael K,
    2. Villablanca JP,
    3. Saleh R,
    4. et al

    . Contrast enhanced MR angiography at 3T in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:2118–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Kuo PH,
    2. Kanal E,
    3. Abu-Alfa AK,
    4. et al

    . Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology 2007;242:647–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Altman DG

    . Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991
25. 25.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Kaufmann T,
    3. Kallmes DF

    . Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:497–500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text