Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Wall Shear Stress in Intracranial Self-Expanding Stents Studied Using Ultra-High-Resolution 3D Reconstructions

G. Benndorf, M. Ionescu, M.V. y Alvarado, J. Hipp and R. Metcalfe
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2009, 30 (3) 479-486; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1396
G. Benndorf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Ionescu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.V. y Alvarado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Hipp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Metcalfe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Stent surface reconstructions show the architecture of the OCD NF stent (top, A) and of the CCD Enterprise stent (top, C). Four platinum markers for improved visualization under fluoroscopy are attached at the ends of the stents. “Down the barrel” views of stent and wall reconstructions show the fully deployed NF (A) and Enterprise (C) stents inside PTFE tubes. Slight strut vertex misalignment is present along the NF stent (double arrows, A). Due to larger size markers, some struts are prolapsed into the lumen (arrows, C). Velocity (centimeter/second) contour plots on cross-sectional planes at peak systole are superimposed on the corresponding 3D reconstructions for NF (B) and Enterprise (D) stents. The struts and walls are shown in 3D projections (gray). The plane in B illustrates the flow near 8 vertices where strut vertex prolapse (arrow) and strut vertex misalignment (double arrows) are present. Low-speed flow under the prolapse and misalignment can be seen. Due to closed cell design, no strut prolapse is present with the Enterprise stent (D) except at the markers.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Overall WSS (dyne/square centimeter) distributions at peak systole for NF (A) and Enterprise (B) along the tube show that the peak WSS is generated at the luminal face of the struts and markers. Increased WSS is seen at the center of the cells of the NF stent (A). The WSS pattern in the Enterprise case is relatively uniform along the tube (B). Contour plots of z-component (longitudinal flow direction) WSS are clipped to indicate locations of negative WSS for the NF (C) and Enterprise (D) stents. Negative WSS is present at some strut vertices (arrow, C) and the markers. For the Enterprise stent, negative WSS is present distal to the markers (arrows, D). Also, the struts connected to the markers prolapse into the lumen (double arrows, D).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    WSS (dyne/square centimeter) distributions at peak systole for a regularly apposed cell for NF (A) and for Enterprise (C) stents. Low WSS regions develop upstream and/or downstream to strut vertices (arrows, A and C) and markers (single arrows, B and D). The location where the markers are connected to the struts is also subjected to low-velocity flow (double arrows, B and D). The prolapsed strut vertices (double arrows, D) permit low-speed flow between the strut and the wall, creating a low WSS shadow under the raised strut.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Plot of WSS along a longitudinal line across a regularly apposed cell. The NF cell is longer than the Enterprise cell by about a factor of 2. High WSS is present on the luminal faces of the struts. WSS is low proximal and distal to the struts, whereas inside the cells, the WSS increases toward the middle. The average WSS for the NF stent is approximately 57 dyne/cm2, whereas for the Enterprise stent, it is approximately 46 dyne/cm2.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Plots of near-wall (10 μm) velocity vectors (centimeter/second) around imaging markers for the NF (A) and for the Enterprise (B) stent. Due to the size of the NF stent markers (∼180-μm height and 400-μm width), the flow is disturbed (A) in these regions. A similar perturbation occurs near the Enterprise markers (∼250-μm height and 350-μm width). The flared ends of the Enterprise stent keep the struts here away from the wall and permit near-wall flow under the strut (B), which does not occur with the NF (A).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Stent dimensions after deployment*

    SentInlet (inner diameter)Outlet (inner diameter)Cross-Sectional AreaLength
    Major AxisMinor AxisMajor AxisMinor Axis
    Neuroform4.0 mm3.5 mm3.8 mm3.8 mm11.11 mm23.0 cm
    Enterprise4.0 mm3.6 mm4.0 mm3.6 mm11.21 mm23.0 cm
    • * Note deviations from symmetry and longitudinal nonuniformity.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 3
March 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Wall Shear Stress in Intracranial Self-Expanding Stents Studied Using Ultra-High-Resolution 3D Reconstructions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
G. Benndorf, M. Ionescu, M.V. y Alvarado, J. Hipp, R. Metcalfe
Wall Shear Stress in Intracranial Self-Expanding Stents Studied Using Ultra-High-Resolution 3D Reconstructions
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2009, 30 (3) 479-486; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1396

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Wall Shear Stress in Intracranial Self-Expanding Stents Studied Using Ultra-High-Resolution 3D Reconstructions
G. Benndorf, M. Ionescu, M.V. y Alvarado, J. Hipp, R. Metcalfe
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2009, 30 (3) 479-486; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1396
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Added Value of Volume-of-Interest C-Arm CT Imaging during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
  • Contour Neurovascular System: Five Year Follow Up
  • Effect of SARS-CoV2 on Endovascular Thrombectomy
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire