Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study

A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn and J.P. Villablanca
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2009, 30 (2) 349-355; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1319
A. Tomasian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Salamon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.S. Krishnam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. Finn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. Villablanca
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    3D volume-rendered images from full-dose (15 mL) (A) and half-dose (7.5 mL) (B) contrast-enhanced MRV show diagnostic image quality of most of the cerebral venous structures.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Half-dose CE-MRV. Sagittal (A) and axial (B) thin MIP images (TR/TE, 3.4/1.3 ms; flip angle, 25°) in a 28-year-old man with history of headache show filling defects within the superior sagittal sinus (A, large arrow) and transverse and sigmoid sinuses (B, small arrows) consistent with thrombosis. Note the high diagnostic quality of the vein of Galen (A, arrowhead), the basal vein of Rosenthal (A, small arrow), and the internal cerebral veins (A, thin large arrow).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Half-dose CE-MRV. A and B, Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) full-thickness MIP images (TR/TE, 3.4/1.3 ms; flip angle, 25°) in a 27-year-old man show cerebral arteriovenous malformation nidus (A and B, arrow) and a large draining vein to the superior sagittal sinus (A and B, arrowhead). C–E, DSAs confirm the findings on CE-MRV. Feeder artery (middle cerebral artery) (C, arrow), arteriovenous malformation nidus (D, arrow), and draining vein to the superior sagittal sinus (E, arrow) are clearly visualized.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Visualization of venous segments on full-dose and half-dose high-spatial-resolution CE-MRV (n = 640)*

    LocationReader 1Reader 2
    Full-Dose (half-dose) CE-MRVFull-Dose (half-dose) CE-MRV
    Mean ± SDMedianRangeMean ± SDMedianRange
    Superior sagittal sinus4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Inferior sagittal sinus3.45 ± 0.60 (3.40 ± 0.68)3.5 (3.5)2–4 (2–4)3.55 ± 0.60 (3.45 ± 0.69)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Transverse sinus3.97 ± 0.16 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)3–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Sigmoid sinus3.97 ± 0.16 (3.97 ± 0.16)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Straight sinus3.95 ± 0.22 (3.90 ± 0.31)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)3.90 ± 0.31 (3.95 ± 0.22)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)
    Cavernous sinus3.72 ± 0.60 (3.70 ± 0.52)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)3.70 ± 0.65 (3.62 ± 0.59)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Superior petrosal sinus3.05 ± 0.75 (2.97 ± 0.66)3 (3)1–4 (1–4)2.95 ± 0.71 (2.90 ± 0.67)3 (3)1–4 (1–4)
    Torcula herophili4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Cortical vein3.97 ± 0.16 (3.97 ± 0.16)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)3.92 ± 0.27 (3.95 ± 0.22)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)
    Vein of Galen3.95 ± 0.22 (3.90 ± 0.31)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)3.90 ± 0.31 (3.85 ± 0.37)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)
    Internal cerebral vein3.65 ± 0.53 (3.55 ± 0.64)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)3.62 ± 0.54 (3.52 ± 0.64)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Middle cerebral vein3.25 ± 0.67 (2.37 ± 0.87)3 (2)2–4 (1–4)3.25 ± 0.71 (2.37 ± 0.84)3 (2.5)2–4 (1–4)
    Basal vein of Rosenthal3.40 ± 0.68 (3.20 ± 0.70)3.5 (3)2–4 (2–4)3.35 ± 0.75 (3.35 ± 0.67)3.5 (3)2–4 (2–4)
    Septal vein2.95 ± 0.60 (2.35 ± 0.81)3 (2)2–4 (1–4)2.95 ± 0.69 (2.35 ± 0.75)3 (2.5)2–4 (1–3)
    Superior cerebellar vein2.72 ± 0.60 (2.32 ± 0.76)3 (2.5)1–4 (1–3)2.82 ± 0.68 (2.37 ± 0.77)3 (3)1–4 (1–4)
    Posterior tonsillar vein2.87 ± 0.56 (2.37 ± 0.63)3 (2)2–4 (1–3)3.00 ± 0.60 (2.45 ± 0.68)3 (2.5)2–4 (1–4)
    Inferior vermian vein2.70 ± 0.73 (2.15 ± 0.74)3 (2)2–4 (1–3)2.85 ± 0.75 (2.25 ± 0.79)3 (2)2–4 (1–3)
    Superior ophthalmic vein3.62 ± 0.59 (3.55 ± 0.60)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)3.70 ± 0.52 (3.55 ± 0.55)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Thalamostriate vein2.67 ± 0.73 (2.25 ± 0.74)3 (2)1–4 (1–3)2.62 ± 0.74 (2.22 ± 0.73)3 (2)1–4 (1–3)
    Internal jugular vein4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    • Note:—CE-MRV indicates contrast-enhanced MR venography.

    • * The 4-point scale for evaluation of visualization of venous segments is as follows: grade 1, not visible; grade 2, partially visible, not sufficient for diagnosis; grade 3, generally homogeneous enhancement and continuity of venous structure, sufficient for diagnosis; and grade 4, excellent image quality with highly homogeneous and continuous enhancement with sharpness of vessel border allowing highly confident diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the vessel delineation scores assigned by the 2 readers (P > .05 for all segments). Analysis with the κ coefficient revealed excellent interobserver agreement for the full-dose (κ = 0.87) and half-dose (κ = 0.85) groups. Delineation scores were significantly lower for the small venous segments, including the middle cerebral, septal, superior cerebellar, inferior vermian, posterior tonsillar, and thalamostriate veins in the half-dose group compared with the single-dose group (P < .01 for all).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    SNR and CNR in full- and half-dose CE-MRV*

    Full-Dose CE-MRVHalf-Dose CE-MRV
    SNRCNRSNRCNR
    Superior sagittal sinus611.5 ± 82.3501.3 ± 77.6322.2 ± 45.1291.3 ± 41.6
    Inferior sagittal sinus276.8 ± 31.2236.5 ± 29.3158.7 ± 23.3132.7 ± 21.5
    Straight sinus508.8 ± 77.6461.1 ± 70.9234.5 ± 32.6203.8 ± 28.8
    Transverse sinus532.9 ± 81.2479.2 ± 75.4302.2 ± 45.6269.3 ± 40.9
    Sigmoid sinus555.4 ± 84.6497.6 ± 79.4309.4 ± 48.1261.8 ± 43.3
    Vein of Galen490.7 ± 62.3434.2 ± 58.2224.4 ± 29.7194.4 ± 26.9
    Internal cerebral vein390.1 ± 58.8342.1 ± 50.8201.3 ± 31.3168.6 ± 30.2
    Internal jugular vein572.6 ± 81.1516.6 ± 72.9334.8 ± 44.5305.8 ± 40.8
    • Note:—SNR indicates signal intensity-to-noise ratio; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio.

    • * All values are presented as mean ± SD. SNR and CNR values are significantly lower in the half-dose CE-MRV group compared with the single-dose CE-MRV group (P < .001 for all segments).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 2
February 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn, J.P. Villablanca
3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2009, 30 (2) 349-355; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1319

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study
A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn, J.P. Villablanca
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2009, 30 (2) 349-355; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1319
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire