Article CommentaryEditorials
Response to “Randomized Vertebroplasty Trials: Bad News or Sham News?”
D. Kallmes, R. Buchbinder, J. Jarvik, P. Heagerty, B. Comstock, J. Turner and R. Osborne
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2009, 30 (10) 1809-1810; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1887
D. Kallmes
R. Buchbinder
J. Jarvik
P. Heagerty
B. Comstock
J. Turner

References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- Voormolen MH,
- Mali WP,
- Lohle PN,
- et al
- 4.↵
- Wardlaw D,
- Cummings SR,
- Van Meirhaeghe J,
- et al
- 5.↵
- Kaufmann TJ,
- Trout AT,
- Kallmes DF
In this issue
Advertisement
D. Kallmes, R. Buchbinder, J. Jarvik, P. Heagerty, B. Comstock, J. Turner, R. Osborne
Response to “Randomized Vertebroplasty Trials: Bad News or Sham News?”
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2009, 30 (10) 1809-1810; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1887
0 Responses
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Percutaneous vertebroplasty for subacute and chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures can safely be undertaken in the first year after the onset of symptoms
- Can Coverage Be Rescinded When Negative Trial Results Threaten A Popular Procedure? The Ongoing Saga Of Vertebroplasty
- Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement