Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography

C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller and J. Gralla
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2009, 30 (1) 155-159; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1293
C.B. Nauer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Kellner-Weldon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Von Allmen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Schaller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Gralla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Laubenberger T, Laubenberger J. Techniques of Medical Radiology (in German). Cologne, Germany: Deutscher Árzte-Verlag;1999 :330
  2. ↵
    Vock P, Wolf R. Dose optimization and reduction in CT of children. In: Tack D, Gevenois A, eds. Dose Reduction in Multi-Detector Computed Tomography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag;2007 :234
  3. ↵
    O' Daniel JC, Stevens DM, Cody DD. Reducing radiation exposure from survey CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:509–15
    PubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Platten D, Keat N, Lewis M, et al. Six to ten slice CT scanner comparison report version 14. NHS Website. Available at: http://www.pasa.nhs.uk/PASAWeb/NHSprocurement/CEP/outputs/Imaging.htm#CT. Accessed June 17, 2008
  5. ↵
    Tapiovaara M, Lakkisto M, Servomaa A. A PC-Based Monte Carlo Program for Calculating Patient Doses in Medical X-ray Examinations. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety; 1994:8–54. Report STUK-A139
  6. ↵
    Schultz FW, Geleijns J, Spoelstra FM, et al. Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations. Br J Radiol 2003;76:638–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Beaconsfield T, Nicholson R, Thornton A., et al. Would thyroid and breast shielding be beneficial in CT of the head? Eur Radiol 1998;8:664–67
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC, et al. Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 2008;247:499–506. Epub 2008 Mar 27
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Mulkens T, Salgado R, Bellinck P. Dose optimization and reduction in CT of the head and neck, including brain. In: Tack D, Gevenois A, eds. Dose Reduction in Multi-Detector Computed Tomography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag;2007 :136–51
  10. ↵
    Brosi P, Wolf RW. A systematic approach to dose optimization in pediatric digital x-ray imaging of the spine. Presented as an E-Poster at: Annual Meeting of the European Congress of Radiology; March 7–11, 2008; Vienna, Austria
  11. ↵
    Irving BJ, Maree GJ, Hering GE, et al. Radiation dose from a linear slit scanning x-ray machine with full body imaging capabilities. Radiation Protection Dosimetry Website. 2008. Available at: http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/ncn073. Accessed August 21, 2008
  12. ↵
    Maree JG, Irving BJ, Hering GE. Pediatric dose measurements in a full-body digital radiography unit. Pediatr Radiol 2008;37:990–97
  13. ↵
    Samei E, Lo YL, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems. Radiology 2005;235:940–49
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    Potgieter JH, de Villiers M, Scheelke M, et al. An explanation for the extremely low, but variable, radiation dosages measured in a linear slit scanning radiography system. In: Flynn MJ, ed. Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging—Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 5745, San Diego, Calif; February 13, 2005.2005 :1138–45
  15. ↵
    Scheelke M, Potgieter H, de Villiiers M. System characterization of the STATSCAN full body slit scanning radiography machine: theory and experiment. In: Flynn MJ, ed. Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging—Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 5745, San Diego, Calif; February 13, 2005.2005 :5745:1179–90
  16. ↵
    Sones RA, Lauro KL, Cattell CL. A detector for scanned projection radiography. Radiology 1990;175:553–59
    PubMed
  17. ↵
    Korbuly D, Moore R, Formanek A, et al. Scanography with rotation of the radiographic tube: a new method. Radiology 1980;135:495–99
    PubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 1
January 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller, J. Gralla
Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2009, 30 (1) 155-159; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1293

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography
C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller, J. Gralla
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2009, 30 (1) 155-159; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1293
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire