Assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas of the Cavernous Sinuses on 3D Dynamic MR Angiography

References

1. ↵
   Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, et al. Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg 1985;62:248–56

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, et al. Dural fistulas involving the cavernous sinus: results of treatment in 30 patients. Radiology 1987;163:437–42

   PubMed
3. Chen YW, Jeng JS, Liu HM, et al. Carotid and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in different types of carotid-cavernous fistula. Stroke 2000;31:701–06

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Kurata A, Takano M, Tokiwa K, et al. Spontaneous carotid cavernous fistula presenting only with cranial nerve palsies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:1097–101

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Stiebel-Kalish H, Setton A, Nimii Y, et al. Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous malformations: patterns of venous drainage are related to clinical signs and symptoms. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1685–91

   CrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   Wu HC, Ro LS, Chen CJ, et al. Isolated ocular motor nerve palsy in dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistula. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:1221–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Hirabuki N, Miura T, Mitomo M, et al. MR imaging of dural arteriovenous malformations with ocular signs. Neuroradiology 1988;30:390–94

   CrossRefPubMed
8. Chen JC, Tsuruda JS, Halbach VV. Suspected dural arteriovenous fistula: results with screening MR angiography in seven patients. Radiology 1992;183:265–71

   PubMed
9. ↵
   Komiyama M, Fu Y, Yagura H, et al. MR imaging of dural AV fistulas at the cavernous sinus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:397–401

   PubMed
10. ↵
    Hirai T, Korogi Y, Hamatake S, et al. Three-dimensional FISP imaging in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistula: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:253–59

    Abstract
11. ↵
    Ouanounou S, Tomsick TA, Heitsman C, et al. Cavernous sinus and inferior petrosal sinus flow signal on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1476–81

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Paksoy Y, Genc BO, Genc E. Retrograde flow in the left inferior petrosal sinus and blood steal of the cavernous sinus associated with central vein stenosis: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1364–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Sakamoto M, Taoka T, Iwasaki S, et al. Paradoxical parasellar high signals resembling shunt diseases on routine 3D time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain: mechanism for the signals and differential diagnosis from shunt diseases. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1289–93

    CrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:707–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451–53

    PubMed
16. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. Coley SC, Romanowski CA, Hodgson TJ, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    Mori H, Aoki S, Okubo T, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:27–33. Epub 2003 Jul 19

    PubMed
19. ↵
    Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography—initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244–51

    PubMed
20. ↵
    Gauvrit JY, Oppenheim C, Nataf F, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol 2006;16:583–91

    CrossRefPubMed
21. ↵
    Bonneville JF, Cattin F, Racle A, et al. Dynamic CT of the laterosellar extradural venous spaces. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:535–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    Milburn JM, Moran CJ, Cross DT 3rd, et al. Effect of intraarterial papaverine on cerebral circulation time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1081–85

    Abstract
23. ↵
    Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:283–89

    PubMed
24. ↵
    Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA. A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 1995;82:166–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998;17:1033–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003;229:3–08

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228:303–08

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Takahashi S, Tomura N, Watarai J, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the cavernous sinus with venous congestion of the brain stem: report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:886–88

    Abstract/FREE Full Text