A Comparison of Angiographic CT and Multisection CT in Lumbar Myelographic Imaging

References

1. ↵
   Bartynski WS, Lin L. Lumbar root compression in the lateral recess: MR imaging, conventional myelography, and CT myelography comparison with surgical confirmation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:348–60

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   Bischoff RJ, Rodriguez RP, Gupta K, et al. A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:289–95

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. Saint-Louis LA. Lumbar spinal stenosis assessment with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;122–36
4. Thornton MJ, Lee MJ, Pender S, et al. Evaluation of the role of magnetic resonance myelography in lumbar spine imaging. Eur Radiol 1999;9:924–29

   CrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Aoki C, et al. Application of multi-detector row helical scanning to postmyelographic CT. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1438–43

   PubMed
6. ↵
   Kufeld M, Claus B, Campi A, et al. Three-dimensional rotational myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1290–93

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Zellerhoff M, Scholz B, Ruehrnschopf EP, et al. Low contrast 3D reconstruction from C-arm data. Proc SPIE 2005;5745:646–55

   CrossRef
8. ↵
   Benndorf G, Strother CM, Claus B, et al. Angiographic CT in cerebrovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1813–18

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. Benndorf G, Claus B, Strother CM, et al. Increased cell opening and prolapse of struts of a Neuroform stent in curved vasculature: value of angiographic com-puted tomography: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2006;58:ONS-E380; discussion ONS-E380
10. ↵
    Heran NS, Song JK, Namba K, et al. The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:330–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    Kalender WA. The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging [in German]. Radiologe 2003;43:379–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Loose R, Wucherer M, Brunner T. [Visualization of 3D low contrast objects by CT cone-beam reconstruction of a rotational angiography with a dynamic solid body detector [in German]. RoFo 2005;S1:PO 160
13. ↵
    Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Buhk JH, Elolf E, Knauth M. Angiographic computed tomography is comparable to multislice computed tomography in lumbar myelographic imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:739–41

    CrossRefPubMed
16. ↵
    Mauer UM, Kunz U. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging to monitor selective decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis [in German]. Orthopade 2006;35:1258–60

    CrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    Jakobsson U, Westergren A. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data. Scand J Caring Sci 2005;19:427–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Macho J, et al. 3D angiography. Clinical interest. First applications in interventional neuroradiology. J Neuroradiol 1998;25:251–62

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF, et al. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 2005;235:354–58

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Akhtar M, Vakharia KT, Mishell J, et al. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:43–49

    CrossRefPubMed