The Influence of Gender on Auditory and Language Cortical Activation Patterns: Preliminary Data

References

1. ↵
   Bandettini PA, Wong EC, Hinks RS, et al. Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magn Reson Med 1992;25:390–397

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:5675–5679

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   Villringer A, Dirnagl U. Coupling of brain activity and cerebral blood flow: basis of functional neuroimaging. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1995;7:240–276

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Belliveau JW, Kennedy DN, McKinstry RC, etal. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science 1991;254:716–719

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. Rao SM, Binder JR, Bandettini PA, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements. Neurology 1993;43:2311–2318

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. Yetkin FZ, Mueller WM, Hammeke TA, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging mapping of the sensorimotor cortex with tactile stimulation. Neurosurgery 1995;36:921–925

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. Howard RJ, Brammer M, Wright I, et al. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Curr Biol 1996;6:1015–1019

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Eden GF, Van Meter JW, Rumsey JM, et al. Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature 1996;4:66–69
9. ↵
   Hinke RM, Hu Z, Stillman AE, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of Broca’s area during internal speech, Neuroreport 1993;4:675–678

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. McCarthy G, Blamire AM, Rothman DL, et al. Echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging studies of frontal cortex activation during word generation in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:4952–4956

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. Benson RR, Kwong KK, Buchbinder BR, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of language dominance using functional MRI. In: Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (SMRM). Berkeley, CA: SMRM;1994 :684
12. Desmond JE, Sum JM, Wagner AD, et al. Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients. Brain 1995;118:1411–1419

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. Binder JR, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, et al. Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 1996;46:978–984

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. Yetkin FZ, Akansel G, Swanson SJ, et al. Correlation of functional MR imaging with Wada results in patients with partial complex epilepsy. Radiology 1996;201:132–133
15. Bahn MM, Lin W, Silbergeld DL, et al. Localization of language cortices by functional MR imaging compared with intracarotid amobarbital hemispheric sedation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:575–579

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. Hertz-Pannier L, Gaillard WD, Mott S, et al. Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI: a preliminary study. Neurology 1997;48:1003–1012

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. Benson RR, FitzGerald DB, LeSueur LL, et al. Language dominance determined by whole-brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions. Neurology 1999;52:798–809

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. Lehericy S, Cohen L, Bazin B, et al. Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test. Neurology 2000;54:1625–1633

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    Brockway JP. Two functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI tasks that may replace the gold standard, Wada testing, for language lateralization while giving additional localization information. Brain Cognition 2000;43:57–59

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Woermann FG, Jokeit H, Luerding R, et al. Language lateralisation by Wada-test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy. Neurology2003;61:699–701
21. ↵
    Ulmer JL, Biswal BB, Yetkin FZ, et al. Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:111–119

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Ulmer JL, Biswal BB, Mark LP, et al. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:480–486

    CrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Van Kylen J, et al. Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:410–416

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Kimura D. Sex differences in the brain. Sci Am 1992;267:118–125

    PubMed
25. ↵
    Jaeger JJ, Lockwood AH, van Valin RD Jr, et al. Sex differences in brain regions activated by grammatical and reading tasks. Neuroreport 1998;9:2803–2807

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 1995;373:607–609

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Pugh KR, Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, et al. Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain 1996;119:1221–1238

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    Salmelin R, Schnitzler A, Parkkonen L, et al. Native language, gender, and functional organization of the auditory cortex, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:10460–10465

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    Lukatela G, Carello C, Savic M, Turvey MT. Hemispheric asymmetries in phonological processing. Neuropsychologia 1986;24:341–350

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    Luh KE, Levy J Interhemispheric cooperation: left is left and right is right but sometimes the twain shall meet. J Expt Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995;21:1243–1258

    CrossRef
31. ↵
    Halpern DF. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum;1986
32. ↵
    Kansaku K, Yamaura A, Kitazawa S. Sex differences in lateralization revealed in the posterior language areas. Cereb Cortex 2000;10:866–872

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Phillips MD, Lowe MJ, Lurito JT, et al. Temporal lobe activation demonstrates sex-based differences during passive listening. Radiology 2001;220:202–207

    PubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    Frost JA, Binder JR, Springer-Verlag JA, et al. Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. Evidence from functional MRI. Brain 1999;122:199–208

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    Price CJ, Moore CJ, Friston KJ. Getting sex into perspective. Neuroimage 1996;3:S586

    CrossRef
36. ↵
    Buckner RL, Raichle ME, Petersen SE. Dissociation of human prefrontal cortical areas across different speech production tasks and gender groups. J Neurophysiol 1995;74:2163–2173

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. ↵
    Harasty J, Double KL, Halliday GM, et al. Language-associated cortical regions are proportionally larger in the female brain. Arch Neurol 1997;54:171–176

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. Giedd JN, Vaituzis AC, Hamburger SD, et al. Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala and hippocampus in normal human development: ages 4–18 years. J Comp Neurol 1996;366:223–230

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. Witelson SF, Glezer II, Kigar DL. Women have greater density of neurons in posterior temporal cortex. J Neurosci 1995;15:3418–3428

    Abstract
40. ↵
    Witelson SF, Kigar DL. Sylvian fissure morphology and asymmetry in men and women: bilateral differences in relation to handedness in men. J Comp Neurol 1992;323:326–340

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. ↵
    Aboitiz F, Scheibel AB, Zaidel E. Morphometry of the Sylvian fissure and the corpus callosum, with emphasis on sex differences. Brain 1992;115:1521–1541

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. ↵
    van der Kallen BF, Morris GL, Yetkin FZ, et al. Hemispheric language dominance studied with functional MR: preliminary study in healthy volunteers and patients with epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:73–77

    Abstract
43. ↵
    Sato H, Sando I, Takahashi H. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea: computer 3-D measurement. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1991;111:1037–1040
44. ↵
    Ulmer JL, Mark LP, Biswal BB, Daniels DL. Functional MR imaging and auditory activation. In: Mukherji SK, Castelijns JA, eds. Modern head and neck imaging. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;1999 :49–78
45. ↵
    Corso JF. Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. Arch Otolaryngol 1963;77:385–405
46. ↵
    Morlet T, Perrin E, Durrant JD, et al. Development of cochlear active mechanisms in human differs between gender. Neurosci Lett 1996;220:49–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. ↵
    Newmark M, Merlob P, Bresloff I, et al. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions: inter-aural and gender differences in newborns. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1997;8:133–139

    PubMed
48. ↵
    Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburg inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. ↵
    McGlone J. Sex differences in the cerebral organization of verbal functions in patients with unilateral brain lesions. Brain 1977;100:775–793

    FREE Full Text
50. ↵
    Kulynych JJ, Vladar K, Jones DW, Weinberger DR. Gender differences in the normal lateralization of the supratemporal cortex: MRI surface-rendering morphometry of Heschl’s gyrus and the planum temporale. Cereb Cortex 1994;4:107–118

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. ↵
    Bilder RM, Howei W, Bogerts B, et al. Absence of regional hemispheric volume asymmetries in first episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:1437–1447

    PubMedWeb of Science
52. ↵
    Duara R, Kushch A, Gross-Glenn K, et al. Neuroanatomic differences between dyslexic and normal readers on magnetic resonance imaging scans. Arch Neurol 1991;48:410–416

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. ↵
    Hardy M. The length of the organ of Corti in man. Am J Anat 1938;62:291–311

    CrossRefWeb of Science
54. ↵
    DiSalle F, Formisano E, Seifritz E, et al. Functional fields in human auditory cortex revealed by time-resolved fMRI without interference of EPI noise. Neuroimage 2001;13:328–338

    PubMedWeb of Science
55. Hall DA, Summerfield AQ, Goncalves MS, et al. Time-course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise. Mag Reson Med 2000;43:601–606

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. ↵
    Talavage TM, Edmister WB. Measuring and reducing the impact of imaging noise on echo-planar functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of auditory cortex. In: Abstracts of the 21st Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, no 138 held in St. Petersburg Beach, FL, February 15–19, 1998.
57. ↵
    Woodruff PW, Benson RR, Bandettini PA, et al. Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent. Neuroreport 1996;7:1909–1913

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. ↵
    Woldorff MG, Gallen CC, Hampson SA, et al. Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:8722–8726

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. ↵
    Grady CL, van Meter JW, Maisog JM, et al. Attention-related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex. Neuroreport 1997;8:2511–2516

    PubMedWeb of Science
60. ↵
    Jancke L, Mirzazade S, Shah NJ. Attention modulates activity in the primary and the secondary auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 1999;266:125–128

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science